Miss-Delectable
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2004
- Messages
- 17,160
- Reaction score
- 7
JS Online: NewsWatch
The deaf, their parents and advocates disagree on whether children are best off learning sign language or using hearing implants and aids to thrive in a hearing world, a split that was on public display today as 1,500 convention-goers and about 600 protesters converged on the Midwest Airlines Center.
Inside, the Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing was holding its 48th biennial convention sponsored by groups including Gallaudet University and the National Institutes of Health.
Outside an 11-month-old organization called the Deaf Bilingual Coalition had gathered protesters from across the country and erected a banner that read: "A.G. Bell Tear Down This Wall."
Coalition members said they had been shut out of the convention, unable to offer parents strong advocacy for the teaching of American Sign Language to deaf babies and their parents.
"Speech is not a language," said David Eberwein, a coalition member from California. "It's just a skill. You can't develop your thinking or full understanding of the world through that alone."
Eberwein said deaf children from families that use sign language read at a higher level than those from families that do not use sign language. He and other coalition members said that a walkway from their hotel to the convention had been closed and that they had not been allowed to put on workshops for parents.
Inside the convention, Bell members offered a very different view, claiming that studies show children who use sign language exclusively have much lower literacy than children who have received hearing aids and speech education.
Catherine Murphy, director of communications, said the walkway was closed not at their request, but by the convention center. Murphy stressed that the convention had provided sign language interpreters and had exhibition booths devoted to American Sign Language.
"A.G. Bell's position is that we're not against sign language," she said. "We're for choices."
Bruce Goldstein, a Bell member and lawyer specializing in special education law, summarized the group's position this way: "We support choice for parents. We promote speaking and listening."
Convention-goer Robert Barden, a 52-year-old Massachusetts man with a deaf son, said that he'd seen many people at the event using sign language, but "there's an unspoken idea that cochlear implants are a great invention."
Barden said his son received a cochlear implant at the age of 5.
"We were both hearing parents and had both taken sign language classes, but we weren't fluent" he said. The implant, he said, "seemed like the best choice for us."
Outside, Tami Hossler stood with the protesters and offered her own testimony as the mother of a deaf daughter and a parent who uses sign language.
"The biggest fear of hearing parents is they don't think they can learn sign language," she said. "What we need to realize is that it's not about us, but about the children. They can be independent, self-confident and feel a connection with a group."
The deaf, their parents and advocates disagree on whether children are best off learning sign language or using hearing implants and aids to thrive in a hearing world, a split that was on public display today as 1,500 convention-goers and about 600 protesters converged on the Midwest Airlines Center.
Inside, the Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing was holding its 48th biennial convention sponsored by groups including Gallaudet University and the National Institutes of Health.
Outside an 11-month-old organization called the Deaf Bilingual Coalition had gathered protesters from across the country and erected a banner that read: "A.G. Bell Tear Down This Wall."
Coalition members said they had been shut out of the convention, unable to offer parents strong advocacy for the teaching of American Sign Language to deaf babies and their parents.
"Speech is not a language," said David Eberwein, a coalition member from California. "It's just a skill. You can't develop your thinking or full understanding of the world through that alone."
Eberwein said deaf children from families that use sign language read at a higher level than those from families that do not use sign language. He and other coalition members said that a walkway from their hotel to the convention had been closed and that they had not been allowed to put on workshops for parents.
Inside the convention, Bell members offered a very different view, claiming that studies show children who use sign language exclusively have much lower literacy than children who have received hearing aids and speech education.
Catherine Murphy, director of communications, said the walkway was closed not at their request, but by the convention center. Murphy stressed that the convention had provided sign language interpreters and had exhibition booths devoted to American Sign Language.
"A.G. Bell's position is that we're not against sign language," she said. "We're for choices."
Bruce Goldstein, a Bell member and lawyer specializing in special education law, summarized the group's position this way: "We support choice for parents. We promote speaking and listening."
Convention-goer Robert Barden, a 52-year-old Massachusetts man with a deaf son, said that he'd seen many people at the event using sign language, but "there's an unspoken idea that cochlear implants are a great invention."
Barden said his son received a cochlear implant at the age of 5.
"We were both hearing parents and had both taken sign language classes, but we weren't fluent" he said. The implant, he said, "seemed like the best choice for us."
Outside, Tami Hossler stood with the protesters and offered her own testimony as the mother of a deaf daughter and a parent who uses sign language.
"The biggest fear of hearing parents is they don't think they can learn sign language," she said. "What we need to realize is that it's not about us, but about the children. They can be independent, self-confident and feel a connection with a group."