Pro-choice safe for decades to come

Status
Not open for further replies.
That link, if it's true... why did Obama want to make sure there is no abortion survivor if FOCA has passed? :/
 
Maria said:
That's one of the reasons why I am against Obama for his idea on pro-choice. I am for pro-life.
Click to expand...

Yet you have offered full support for a woman that routinely shoots animals. Hardly pro-life. More like anti-abortion. Two very different concepts. Yet one that the anti-abortionists continue to claim to add validity to their view.:roll:
 
dreama said:
Which is what is happening at the moment. So many poor women are being presurized into having an abortion by their partners and families. So many poor fetuses and Premmie babies will get murdered in the name of 'choice'.
Click to expand...

First of all, dreama, since you continually use this argument incorrectly, it is "pressured" not "presurized". To presurize a woman, we would have to put her in a sealed compartment.

Secondly, prematurely delivered babies are a completely different topic from elective abortion. The fact that you cannot seem to separate the two shows that you really have little understanding of the issue.

Thirdly, if a woman allows a man to pressure her into a decision as important as whether or not to become a parent, I doubt seriously that she would be capable of putting a child first and being a good parent. What's next....a man pressures her into not feeding the child once it has been born, or pressures her into stabbing it because it won't quit crying? If these women are not strong enough to make this decision for themselves, they are certainly not strong enpugh to withstand all the stress of being a single parent.
 
jillio said:
First of all, dreama, since you continually use this argument incorrectly, it is "pressured" not "presurized". To presurize a woman, we would have to put her in a sealed compartment.

Secondly, prematurely delivered babies are a completely different topic from elective abortion. The fact that you cannot seem to separate the two shows that you really have little understanding of the issue.

Thirdly, if a woman allows a man to pressure her into a decision as important as whether or not to become a parent, I doubt seriously that she would be capable of putting a child first and being a good parent. What's next....a man pressures her into not feeding the child once it has been born, or pressures her into stabbing it because it won't quit crying? If these women are not strong enough to make this decision for themselves, they are certainly not strong enpugh to withstand all the stress of being a single parent.
Click to expand...

:gpost:
 
jillio said:
Yet you have offered full support for a woman that routinely shoots animals. Hardly pro-life. More like anti-abortion. Two very different concepts. Yet one that the anti-abortionists continue to claim to add validity to their view.:roll:
Click to expand...

Oh, yeah ? Since she is a hunter for food. Hunters don't eat human babies for meats unless if you are cannibal. Grocery stores don't sell dead human babies for meats. That's a different concept from animals.
 
Maria said:
Oh, yeah ? Since she is a hunter for food. Hunters don't eat human babies for meats unless if you are cannibal. Grocery stores don't sell dead human babies for meats. That's a different concept from animals.
Click to expand...

But they're innocent! They did NOTHING wrong to you!
 
Mod's Note:

It's time to cool this thread down. It's getting hot in here.

So, with that, the thread is closed for the time being.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top