I Demand Apology!

My plan is to make sure that NAD dont repeat CAD's near fatal mistakes.

diehardbiker65's recent incendiaries on this issue reinforces the perspectives of his beliefs that leadership should be an exact science when it's actually an art.

Richard
 
Nesmuth said:
HOVRS may not seem to win their case in the courthouse, but theyre winning outside the courtroom big time . If you want to rant like that that's fine by me.

Richard
Click to expand...

*Points finger at Richard and laughs*

Yeah, that site's really slamming home the point that nobody gives a crap about that site. I just checked it. There haven't been any new reviews since my last visit 2 weeks ago. No one's using the site.

Richard, you sound like you're never gonna be happy until the whole deaf and hearing world kow-tow to you and name you Dictator-for-Life. You think that everyone out there seems to have it in for you and they're all plotting for your demise. That's not healthy, man.
 
Nesmuth,
You seems to have TONS and TONS of resentments inside you. I think it is time for you to do your own personal inventory, going back to the first resentment you had in the past. The answer is really in there to solve your TONS of TONS resentment.

Demanding an Aplogize only covers up your own shits and they won't go away.
 
diehardbiker65 said:
Nesmuth,
You seems to have TONS and TONS of resentments inside you. I think it is time for you to do your own personal inventory, going back to the first resentment you had in the past. The answer is really in there to solve your TONS of TONS resentment.

Demanding an Aplogize only covers up your own shits and they won't go away.
Click to expand...

That's very interesting diehardbiker65.

I'm a very happy person!

It's the community that's not happy and I'm just bullhorning their resentments and they do have tons and tons of resentments. You just sem not happy with my definition of their resentments.

Richard
 
Dennis said:
Yeah, that site's really slamming home the point that nobody gives a crap about that site.
Click to expand...

Oh really? Did you know the CPUC has been looking at it?

Richard
 
Nesmuth said:
Oh really? Did you know the CPUC has been looking at it?

Richard
Click to expand...

And the California Public Utility Commission has said.. ? Nothing?

They probably had one staff member check it out once, and mentioned it in a committee meeting once. Now that they've seen that no one uses it, and no one cares about it, and the FCC sure doesn't care about it, they won't legitimize the information on it.

Of course, you never said HOW you know the commission "has been looking at it" so how do you know they're looking at it?
 
I think the letter is fake.

NAD will never let CAD use their name in a bad letter like that.

Jo
 
Nesmuth said:
My plan is to make sure that NAD dont repeat CAD's near fatal mistakes.
Click to expand...

Right, and a good goal it should be. But what is your modus operandi?
 
HawaiiJo said:
I think the letter is fake.

NAD will never let CAD use their name in a bad letter like that.

Jo
Click to expand...

Jo come to my office I'll be happy to show you the letter they sent.

Richard
 
Back
Top