- Joined
- Feb 27, 2003
- Messages
- 4,225
- Reaction score
- 143
Seven deaf patients are suing Laurel Regional Hospital, claiming that it failed to provide them effective means of communication in critical medical situations.
The Washington Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs and the law firm of Sutherland, Asbill and Brennan LLP filed the civil rights lawsuit Tuesday in U.S. District Court.
The plaintiffs say they were denied qualified sign language interpreter services, despite their requests for such, according to a statement issued by Sutherland, Asbill and Brennan. The plaintiffs allege that they were instead provided with inadequate video interpreting, cryptic notes or, most often, no communication at all, the statement said.
Laurel Regional spokeswoman Tracey Veihmeyer said she was not able to comment on the lawsuit.
The suit alleges that the plaintiffs were unable to provide informed consent to treatment, were denied the opportunity to participate in their treatment and were denied the full benefit of the health-care services provided by Laurel Regional, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and other laws, according to the statement.
Elaine Gardner, director of the Washington Lawyers' Committee Disability Rights Project, said deaf patients should receive the same level of effective communication provided for hearing patients. "The ADA is clear: deaf patients have the right to understand, and be understood by, their medical providers," she said in a written statement.
According to the lawsuit, one of the seven plaintiffs, Elizabeth Gillespie of Laurel, went to Laurel Regional's emergency room on Nov. 1, 2003 to receive treatment for severe abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, among other symptoms.
Gillespie was required to wait hours, denied numerous requests for an in-person interpreter, and was prepared for medical tests in a manner that was humiliating, including having a male attendant snap her bra as a means of communicating with her that it needed to be removed, the suit alleges.
Plaintiffs in the suit also include Laurel residents David Irvine (Gillespie's husband), Cary Barbin, Kathryn Hale and Xiomara Porras. The sixth plaintiff is Brian Leffler, formerly of Laurel and now of Virginia. The seventh plaintiff is Erin Whitney, formerly of College Park and now of California.
Under the ADA, discrimination includes the failure to provide auxiliary aids and services. The term "auxiliary aids and services" under the ADA includes "qualified interpreters" who make "aurally delivered materials available to individuals with hearing impairments," according to Sutherland, Asbill and Brennan.
The lawsuit says Laurel Regional used video-remote interpreting for communication, wherein a translator assists through video-conferencing technology.
"This is not an indictment of video interpreting," Lewis Wiener, a litigation partner with Sutherland, said in a written statement.
"Rather, the question is whether, based on the facts, Laurel Hospital's use of video remote interpreting and its refusal to provide these individuals with in-person interpreters meets the requirements of the ADA," Wiener said in the statement. "In this case it clearly did not. Laurel Hospital's failure to provide effective communication has directly injured and continues to injure the plaintiffs."
Wiener has offered his legal services to the plaintiffs without charge.
The suit seeks an order requiring the hospital to provide deaf individuals with effective means of communication, including qualified sign-language interpreters and close-captioned televisions. The suit also seeks compensatory and punitive damages and attorneys fees and costs.
By Steve Eifler
The Washington Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs and the law firm of Sutherland, Asbill and Brennan LLP filed the civil rights lawsuit Tuesday in U.S. District Court.
The plaintiffs say they were denied qualified sign language interpreter services, despite their requests for such, according to a statement issued by Sutherland, Asbill and Brennan. The plaintiffs allege that they were instead provided with inadequate video interpreting, cryptic notes or, most often, no communication at all, the statement said.
Laurel Regional spokeswoman Tracey Veihmeyer said she was not able to comment on the lawsuit.
The suit alleges that the plaintiffs were unable to provide informed consent to treatment, were denied the opportunity to participate in their treatment and were denied the full benefit of the health-care services provided by Laurel Regional, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and other laws, according to the statement.
Elaine Gardner, director of the Washington Lawyers' Committee Disability Rights Project, said deaf patients should receive the same level of effective communication provided for hearing patients. "The ADA is clear: deaf patients have the right to understand, and be understood by, their medical providers," she said in a written statement.
According to the lawsuit, one of the seven plaintiffs, Elizabeth Gillespie of Laurel, went to Laurel Regional's emergency room on Nov. 1, 2003 to receive treatment for severe abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, among other symptoms.
Gillespie was required to wait hours, denied numerous requests for an in-person interpreter, and was prepared for medical tests in a manner that was humiliating, including having a male attendant snap her bra as a means of communicating with her that it needed to be removed, the suit alleges.
Plaintiffs in the suit also include Laurel residents David Irvine (Gillespie's husband), Cary Barbin, Kathryn Hale and Xiomara Porras. The sixth plaintiff is Brian Leffler, formerly of Laurel and now of Virginia. The seventh plaintiff is Erin Whitney, formerly of College Park and now of California.
Under the ADA, discrimination includes the failure to provide auxiliary aids and services. The term "auxiliary aids and services" under the ADA includes "qualified interpreters" who make "aurally delivered materials available to individuals with hearing impairments," according to Sutherland, Asbill and Brennan.
The lawsuit says Laurel Regional used video-remote interpreting for communication, wherein a translator assists through video-conferencing technology.
"This is not an indictment of video interpreting," Lewis Wiener, a litigation partner with Sutherland, said in a written statement.
"Rather, the question is whether, based on the facts, Laurel Hospital's use of video remote interpreting and its refusal to provide these individuals with in-person interpreters meets the requirements of the ADA," Wiener said in the statement. "In this case it clearly did not. Laurel Hospital's failure to provide effective communication has directly injured and continues to injure the plaintiffs."
Wiener has offered his legal services to the plaintiffs without charge.
The suit seeks an order requiring the hospital to provide deaf individuals with effective means of communication, including qualified sign-language interpreters and close-captioned televisions. The suit also seeks compensatory and punitive damages and attorneys fees and costs.
By Steve Eifler
) and signal that I needed a minute. Then,I would go looking for pen and paper. 
Hahahahaha!
