Canon TV? WTF?

interesting... it is because SED may be future but they said they cant compare that with LCD and Plasma. its goal is to bring some of the good qualities of CRT displays (response time, brightness, black levels) to a fixed pixel, very thin, low power display. it may not require the liquids like LCD and Plasma which cant match with CRT level image quality.

SED tvs may be on market in the future. some articles say SED tvs will cost more than LCD tvs.

http://thetechsage.com/archive/2004/09/29/236.aspx

good info about SED
http://searchwin2000.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid1_gci797765,00.html


btw i am loyal to canon. i love digital cameras especially EOS Digital Rebel SLR and my own SD550. ;)
 
Remember we talk about LCD, Plasma, DLP
LCD = up to 60,000 hours will borken
Plasma = up to 30,000 hours will broken
DLP = limit 8,000 hours broken then replace chip

CRT never broken, it is lifetime
Also fast smooth 1ms or less than LCD, Plasma, DLP

SED same size as Flat pancal (LCD and Plasma)
SED same CRT screen good games or super games, or 3D-CAD they are good smooth than LCD and Plasma

SED and CRT are very fast than LCD and Plasma
 
Yadda!,
I've been there and heard about the cosmsor reports about CRT.. issues which will not come broken.. and always permantly lifetime!
Espically LCD will come short term years and barely hard to replace the kind of parts or never.. Pretty quite costly...

Wait and see until will come another cosumsor reports incoming.. to see update!
 
Meep. I think OLED is the future, although how likely it is to be implemented in large-scale displays is hard to know. It's definately going to replace LCDs on handheld devices such as pagers and digital cameras, tho.
 
rhr said:
Remember we talk about LCD, Plasma, DLP
LCD = up to 60,000 hours will borken
Plasma = up to 30,000 hours will broken
DLP = limit 8,000 hours broken then replace chip

CRT never broken, it is lifetime
Also fast smooth 1ms or less than LCD, Plasma, DLP

SED same size as Flat pancal (LCD and Plasma)
SED same CRT screen good games or super games, or 3D-CAD they are good smooth than LCD and Plasma

SED and CRT are very fast than LCD and Plasma

Yes but SED is very slow refresh rate

canonSED2.jpg


You notice dark bar arcoss the screen?

I am not sure about watts for SED. Maybe it is very high than LCD Plasma
 
Teresh said:
Meep. I think OLED is the future, although how likely it is to be implemented in large-scale displays is hard to know. It's definately going to replace LCDs on handheld devices such as pagers and digital cameras, tho.

Hehe. That's would be nice.

Red Planet have same like that but ofc it fake but it's happen!
EM1216_GR_56.gif
 
Neo said:
Yes but SED is very slow refresh rate

canonSED2.jpg


You notice dark bar arcoss the screen?

I am not sure about watts for SED. Maybe it is very high than LCD Plasma


no, they are not not higher as LCD. SEDs are very environment friendly displays. i think SEDs are far better than LCDs. i am glad you brought up this thread. i research some little bits. i find it very interesting ! :)

http://www.soundscapeav.com/sed/SEDtech.htm
 
rhr said:
Remember we talk about LCD, Plasma, DLP
LCD = up to 60,000 hours will borken
Plasma = up to 30,000 hours will broken
DLP = limit 8,000 hours broken then replace chip

CRT never broken, it is lifetime
Also fast smooth 1ms or less than LCD, Plasma, DLP

SED same size as Flat pancal (LCD and Plasma)
SED same CRT screen good games or super games, or 3D-CAD they are good smooth than LCD and Plasma

SED and CRT are very fast than LCD and Plasma

Thank you for reminding us for the information.

I think that a LCD monitor is better because it has no radiation or maybe a very little radiation. CRT has a lot of radiation that makes your eyes tire especially eyes stress from looking at the monitor. I never heard of SED, and I guess I'm behind the news. I believe that a CRT monitor produces a lot of electricity than a LCD monitor.

Let's imagine that we have a big plasma or LCD TV monitor that is broken. Do we really have to throw it away that we paid so much money for it?

I was told that in 2009, all TV broadcasts will only connect to all flat monitors, and they will stop broadcast our CRT TV. We have to prepare to buy a new one in a few more years, and I hope that the prices will go down. But, who knows.
 
Teresh said:
Meep. I think OLED is the future, although how likely it is to be implemented in large-scale displays is hard to know. It's definately going to replace LCDs on handheld devices such as pagers and digital cameras, tho.

I remember I read OLED is not full color, I think about limit 80,000 color, I want 32 million color
 
webexplorer said:
Thank you for reminding us for the information.

I think that a LCD monitor is better because it has no radiation or maybe a very little radiation. CRT has a lot of radiation that makes your eyes tire especially eyes stress from looking at the monitor. I never heard of SED, and I guess I'm behind the news. I believe that a CRT monitor produces a lot of electricity than a LCD monitor.

Let's imagine that we have a big plasma or LCD TV monitor that is broken. Do we really have to throw it away that we paid so much money for it?

I was told that in 2009, all TV broadcasts will only connect to all flat monitors, and they will stop broadcast our CRT TV. We have to prepare to buy a new one in a few more years, and I hope that the prices will go down. But, who knows.

you are right, but LCD's screen is hot! screen will give your face to tan or dark or face is wet

LCD can damage eyes I remember I read pager and cell's lcd about last fall, you go search "LCD Damage Eyes"
 
rhr said:
you are right, but LCD's screen is hot! screen will give your face to tan or dark or face is wet

LCD can damage eyes I remember I read pager and cell's lcd about last fall, you go search "LCD Damage Eyes"

I just checked the google about LCD Damage Eyes. Actually, it has to do with the special video screen sunglasses with built-in LCD which is too close to your eyes, and it is not good idea. (Actually, I did not know that.) Here is the photo that I found on the internet - for example :
 
Last edited by a moderator:
webexplorer said:
I just checked the google about LCD Damage Eyes. Actually, it has to do with the special video screen sunglasses with built-in LCD which is too close to your eyes, and it is not good idea. (Actually, I did not know that.) Here is the photo that I found on the internet - for example :

no! not VR Headset, I saw CNN's Tech Cell can damage eyes. I lost website
 
This is misleading! CRT DO break down! It got half life of these LCD monitor!!! I had third CRT monitors!!! The last two was broken in about 7 years of leaving it on 24/7

Whats more, once CRT breaks, it is way too expensive to fix it and cheaper to replace it with other CRT. On other hand LCD monitor do break, but they all need is replace the light bulb which is inexpensive. That is BIG advantage over CRT.

Your correct about the video quality between CRT and other flat screen. BUT Flat screen quality is getting better every year, as I have noticed!

Trust me, in about 10 years from now, CRT monitor and these glass tubed TV will be a thing of past (History) and we won't be seeing them anymore.

rhr said:
Remember we talk about LCD, Plasma, DLP
LCD = up to 60,000 hours will borken
Plasma = up to 30,000 hours will broken
DLP = limit 8,000 hours broken then replace chip

CRT never broken, it is lifetime
Also fast smooth 1ms or less than LCD, Plasma, DLP

SED same size as Flat pancal (LCD and Plasma)
SED same CRT screen good games or super games, or 3D-CAD they are good smooth than LCD and Plasma

SED and CRT are very fast than LCD and Plasma
 
diehardbiker65 said:
This is misleading! CRT DO break down! It got half life of these LCD monitor!!! I had third CRT monitors!!! The last two was broken in about 7 years of leaving it on 24/7

Maybe you got cheap brand. My parents have Nec 25" and it work great for 20 years already. So finally They bought new LCD HDTV 30"

Whats more, once CRT breaks, it is way too expensive to fix it and cheaper to replace it with other CRT. On other hand LCD monitor do break, but they all need is replace the light bulb which is inexpensive. That is BIG advantage over CRT.

Correct. CRT is very danger for high volts. It can shock you during it's UNPLUG.
 
Neo said:
Maybe you got cheap brand. My parents have Nec 25" and it work great for 20 years already. So finally They bought new LCD HDTV 30"



Correct. CRT is very danger for high volts. It can shock you during it's UNPLUG.

I wonder how your parents got the money to buy that huge LCD monitor. They are lucky to have one at their house. Darn it.
 
rhr said:
I remember I read OLED is not full color, I think about limit 80,000 color, I want 32 million color

You read wrong. OLED can support as many colors as most other display systems. The number of colors on computers is capped for memory reasons rather than anything else. a 1024x768 resolution on your monitor at 24 bit color would require 2 MB of RAM just to put pictures on the screen. Most operating systems do double buffering, so that triples the amount of memory needed. 32 million colors would be 25 bits, which is a nonsense number, as for logistical reasons you should only increment in multiples of 8 as there are 8 bits in a byte.

The next step up would be 32 bit color. That would provide us over 4 billion colors. At the same resolution, it would need 9.5 MB. At 1280x1024, it's 15 MB.

There really isn't much value to 32 bit color because humans can't even distinguish the difference between FFFF09 and FFFF10 in 24 bit color anyway. Why waste so much more memory when people cannot even perceive the difference you are trying to convey?
 
rhr said:
CRT never broken, it is lifetime
Also fast smooth 1ms or less than LCD, Plasma, DLP

Sure, it's lifetime, but it always fade away. Most of time, it fade away after use more than 5 years.
 
Back
Top