ACLU defends Animal Crush Videos, Says It's "Free Speech"

yizuman said:
How am I whining about animal cruelty?

See my previous answer.

Again, how is police brutality the same as animal cruelty?

Yiz
Click to expand...

Same related about how are you whining about it.

Get a deal and not let worry about animal cruelty, it is already illegal and they can be in big trouble.
 
yizuman said:
It shouldn't interfere with hunting at all. You're basing this on assumption and paranoia.

Yiz
Click to expand...

Again, like I said, I don't care at all, unless it isn't interfere with hunting and horror filming of animal abuses.

It applies to any of laws that lawmakers want to deal with animal cruelty.
 
Foxrac said:
Again, like I said, I don't care at all, unless it isn't interfere with hunting and horror filming of animal abuses.

It applies to any of laws that lawmakers want to deal with animal cruelty.
Click to expand...

No need to worry then. Nothing mentioned in this provision of the bill actually mentions hunting at all.

Unless you've read the bill and saw something that I missed.

Yiz
 
yizuman said:
No need to worry then. Nothing mentioned in this provision of the bill actually mentions hunting at all.

Unless you've read the bill and saw something that I missed.

Yiz
Click to expand...

Oh ok, sorry for being butt on you.

I believe that PETA is possibly lobbyist to our congresspeople and they could try to tell about what they want with write the bill, even they may push congresspeople to add anti-hunting to bill for example.

That why I want all lobbyists to be out of our congress.
 
Foxrac said:
Oh ok, sorry for being butt on you.

I believe that PETA is possibly lobbyist to our congresspeople and they could try to tell about what they want with write the bill, even they may push congresspeople to add anti-hunting to bill for example.

That why I want all lobbyists to be out of our congress.
Click to expand...

I agree with the lobbyists staying out of Congress.

Until there's actual evidence that PETA is indirectly involved with the bill, I'll just safely assume they're not, until I read otherwise, then yeah, I will start being suspicious.

Nah, not much of a butt, debates is a good thing, how else can we learn from one another? :)

Yiz
 
If you want the right of free speech applied to yourself and those you happen to agree with, then you must also grant the same to those that you find despicable. It would seem that the vast majority of people don't truly want free speech. They want it applied to them, but cannot seem to give the same to others. That is censorship, not free speech.
 
Back
Top