Search results

It doesn't make sense to me at all. Source(s), please.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-35591988 That will make it clear that FBI needs access to ONE device as the White House said.

Whoa...FBI is not asking Apple to unlock our iphones, just that one iphone belonging to the terrorist in order to collect valuable info that might help catching other terrorists who are still living in America.

Think hard... why would FBI want to know what's in your iphone? FBI doesn't care about you because you are not a terrorist. However if you are, in order to protect us, the FBI has the right to know what your plans are. I believe that soon the lawmakers will make a new law that will require Apple...

LOL I am new to this changed forum. BTW, I was able to edit it.

You don't understand... IT BELONGED TO THE TERRORIST SO IT'S VERY IMPORTANT. If it belongs to you, therefore it's not important for Apple to open it for FBI. You are not a terrorist, are you? If Apple won't do it, ISIS wins. Shame on Apple!

Court warrants allow the law enforcement to seize computers which they may be able to hack so it doesn't make sense that a court protects Apple. It belonged to the TERRORIST. It's possible that there are important info in it that we need to know about ISIS. If Apple won't cooperate, then it...

Yeah, who knows maybe one day his daughter will write a book to tell the truth about him after his death.

Lol, he might but he'd never find them because he was the real killer.You know that, don't you?

Yeah, FX currently shows new TV series called The People VS OJ Simpson: American Crime Story. I am going to watch the fifth episode today. A&E showed the special called O.J. Speaks: The Hidden Tapes. It was very good. It showed how he lost the civil case. Goldman's lawyer did the great job.

I don't understand why FBI can't hack an iphone while they can hack a PC.

OK, for example, if I was a KKK member owning a bakery, when I see black people coming in, I kick them out because I have a 1st Amendment right. "I don't like black people so I have rights not to serve them." ? It is not working. Anti-discrimination laws beat a 1st Amendment right. Once you run...

What? No, it's not because of product availability. They don't approve gay marriages. That's why they refused to make a cake for the lesbians. They can't do that since they are required to treat the public equally as per Oregon law, no matter what. In other words, they violated the law. End of...

It mentioned "labor" three times so I assumed labor law. If it's not a labor law, then it's an anti-discrimination law. Thanks for the correction, ma'am.

It doesn't mention the name of the course. It mentioned that all students must take it. :confused:

Wow, were you taught all of this in high school? My deaf school didn't teach anything like that at all.

Well, the labor law says differently. All businesses must treat customers equally whether they are Gay, Deaf, Muslim, Jew, Black or disabled persons with a guiding dog. Those businesses have a right not to serve a customer for a good reason like a customer with a bad attitude.

That's so stupid. Hopefully the female judge will dismiss it and tell the husband to divorce her if he's not happy. That's what a spouse is supposed to do if she/he is not happily married...get a divorce.

I don't understand why, in the first place, Walmart had its stores in small towns where there are small populations. Did they expect to make profits there? Small town = small population = few customers

University of Texas removed the statue of Jefferson Davis from campus. What does PC have to do with it? They finally looked at it as inappropriate so they removed it. No big deal.