Heinous

Status
Not open for further replies.
TXgolfer said:
So let them face the consequences rather than kill the consequences. That person they kill might cure cancer. I wouldn't be posting this now if Steve Jobs had been aborted.
Click to expand...

What? :eek3: :confused:
 
kokonut said:
Unfortunately, many make the bad decisions to have sex without thinking of consequences or refuse to be accountable for their own actions. And in their own selfishness, decides to end a life.
Click to expand...

kokonut said:
The biggest human rights travesty is against unborn babies who have no voice on their right to live.

One solution is for the govt to offer $2,000 (for example) to anyone who volunteer to be surgically sterilized. Everything is paid for.
Click to expand...

it sounds very familiar to me that can relates with other issue. same concept. so just never mind.
 
TXgolfer said:
So let them face the consequences rather than kill the consequences. That person they kill might cure cancer. I wouldn't be posting this now if Steve Jobs had been aborted.
Click to expand...

there would be other "Steve Jobs" anyway like Tim Cook... and I guess millions of Jews would be posting this now if Adolf Hitler had been aborted.... :dunno:
 
Jiro said:
there would be other "Steve Jobs" anyway like Tim Cook... and I guess millions of Jews would be posting this now if Adolf Hitler had been aborted.... :dunno:
Click to expand...

Maybe....maybe not. How about we let the babies live so we can find out. :)
 
TXgolfer said:
Maybe....maybe not. How about we let the babies live so we can find out. :)
Click to expand...

or how about we let the parents decide for themselves? I thought you're all about not interfering with parental rights.
 
why does it bother you all if someone decides to have abortion?
 
Because we see it as murder. To us the baby is a human from conception.
When you were pregnant, when did you acknowledge you had a baby? A son or a daughter? When did you become protective of your child? Did you change your eating habits? Did you stop any bad habits that could harm the baby?
 
i can see that why. It will take forever to agrue about that. I still look at the women's body and its their rights to make choices. If they were force to being pregnant and the baby will suffer the consequences that the womens body they wouldnt take care of such as drinking and do drugs. The result that baby will be suffering alive. I dont want that.
 
Frisky Feline said:
i can see that why. It will take forever to agrue about that. I still look at the women's body and its their rights to make choices. If they were force to being pregnant and the baby will suffer the consequences that the womens body they wouldnt take care of such as drinking and do drugs. The result that baby will be suffering alive. I dont want that.
Click to expand...

Do you support China killing baby girls because only boys can live by law?
 
Frisky Feline said:
alive baby girls that aren't inside womens body. No
Click to expand...

Would you support the removal of all Federal funding from Planned Parenthood due to Planned Parenthood helping women to receive abortions based on selection of gender?
 
rolling7 said:
Would you support the removal of all Federal funding from Planned Parenthood due to Planned Parenthood helping women to receive abortions based on selection of gender?
Click to expand...

No, I rebuked the claim about Planned Parenthood supports abortion due to gender reason and PP denied the claim.
 
airportcop said:
Do you support China killing baby girls because only boys can live by law?
Click to expand...

You mean some Chinese couples, right?

There are no laws in China that allow for killing of females nor does the government endorse any kind of infanticide thru law. It would be erroneous to say that they do. You might get into a serious argument with some asians if they overheard you saying that.
 
Jiro said:
or how about we let the parents decide for themselves? I thought you're all about not interfering with parental rights.
Click to expand...

I am.....but I don't think killing should be a parental right
 
Foxrac said:
No, I rebuked the claim about Planned Parenthood supports abortion due to gender reason and PP denied the claim.
Click to expand...

It is impossible for you and PP to deny because it is on live video with audio.
Certainly you have heard the expression: "Where there is one cockroach, there are many, many more hidden."
 
Frisky Feline said:
i can see that why. It will take forever to agrue about that. I still look at the women's body and its their rights to make choices. If they were force to being pregnant and the baby will suffer the consequences that the womens body they wouldnt take care of such as drinking and do drugs. The result that baby will be suffering alive. I dont want that.
Click to expand...

Then they should be sterilized. Have govt set up a volunteer sterilization program where they are paid to get sterilized. It'd be cheaper for the govt to do this over the long run of things. Less suffering of babies getting aborted for selfish reasons.
 
Foxrac said:
No, I rebuked the claim about Planned Parenthood supports abortion due to gender reason and PP denied the claim.
Click to expand...

Umm....hard to deny the video...lol

And "rebuked" ? Excellent word you have come across there. :hmm:
 
rolling7 said:
It is impossible for you and PP to deny because it is on live video with audio.
Certainly you have heard the expression: "Where there is one cockroach, there are many, many more hidden."
Click to expand...

PP and other abortion clinics are all to happy to see more of their clinics in black and Hispanic neighborhoods than white. It's a money making industry based on legalized murder. Why more clinics in black and Hispanic neighborhoods? Rather interesting.

We began by creating a database of the ZIP codes for every Planned Parenthood facility in the United States. This list was generated from Planned
Parenthood’s website. We then used United States Census Bureau figures to establish the percentage of black and Hispanic people residing within each of
these ZIP codes as well as within each state.

The resulting data allowed us to calculate how often these ZIP codes contain a higher proportion of blacks and/or Hispanics than the state in which they are located. Of equal importance is that this data also gave us the size of those disparities. The results of those calculations are given in a chart found laterin this report.
.
.
.
It is also important to note the number of times there are multiple facilities in disproportionately minority ZIP codes. For example, in New Jersey, ZIP code
07631 has a black population 286.7% of the state’s overall percentage and a Hispanic population 163.9% of the state. That ZIP code alone has four
population control facilities. Similarly, Minnesota ZIP code 55404 has a black population that is 797.1% of the overall state percentage and a Hispanic
population 537.9% of the state. In that ZIP code there are three population control centers.

Again, this pattern is repeated in state after state. We identified 116 ZIP codes with more than one population control facility. Of those, 84 were
disproportionately black and/or Hispanic. What this means is that, when the American family planning industry places multiple facilities in a ZIP code, that
ZIP code is more than two-and-a-half times as likely to be disproportionately minority as not.

What we now know – and have documented – is that there is not one state in the union without population control centers located in ZIP codes with higher percentages of blacks and/or Hispanics than the state’s overall percentage. In fact, Hawaii is the only state that does not have facilities located in ZIP codes exceeding 125% of their overall percentage.

Not only is this racial targeting widespread, it’s scale is often enormous. We found 42 states with family planning facilities in ZIP codes where the black and/or Hispanic populations exceeds 200% of the state’s overall percentage. More telling is that these percentages routinely go far beyond even this level.
Numerous states have facilities in ZIP codes that range from 250% to well over 1,000% and it is not uncommon for them to have facilities located in many such ZIP codes.
Click to expand...
http://www.lifenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/LifeDynamicsRacialReport.pdf

Sounds like if you support abortion as a choice you also unwittingly support eugenics in this case. No thanks. If abortion doesn't bother you then sex selection for abortion shouldn't bother you either. Same goes for abortion because of deafness or any other medical condition or disabilities discovered or have a high percentage of it happening would choose to have an abortion. Of course, the baby in the womb has no right to live. And instead, for selfish reasons, abort him or her because having a baby would be an "inconvenience."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top