Herman Cain Shrugs Off His Anita Hill Joke

Status
Not open for further replies.
saywhatkid said:
I was gonna say, it never stopped our resident Conservatives from turning over every stone, for every Democrat, looking for incriminating evidence that they are all actually convicted felons. I thought that was what politics had become; a series of unearthing behavioral issues, followed by the other side defending them from whatever was uncovered. Nothing about how good my guy is, just how bad the other guy is.

The reason Liberals are doing this awful thing; look at the byline of FoxNews. Something about "fair and balanced" reporting.
Click to expand...

Might want to look at CNN, MSNBC, and CBS, while you're at it, too.
 
jillio said:
First off, I did not question Reba on her Biblical interpretations. Secondly, I have never disclosed my particular spiritual belief system on AD. Thirdly, if I were an agnostic, it is the nature of the the agnostic to question. That is why they are agnostic.
Click to expand...

Well, you have not given your beliefs, and I am not going to pick for you. It is a personal thing. I was Agnostic for years, and I questioned a lot. *shrugs*
 
TheWriteAlex said:
Humility? :shock: Huh? Actually, this is one of the clinical definitions of insane behavior.

I know exactly where his path is leading. . . .

How exactly does God let a Christian know his will? Does one hear his voice? Does he materialize and give directions? Does he drop a leaf from the sky and create a metaphor? Does the magic 8-ball come into focus?

This is a legitimate question. I'm really curious how this "God's will" stuff works.

SILENCE! Do not inject logic into this conversation!!!!

H Y P O C R I T E
Click to expand...

So, am I to assume you have a vested interest in Obama?
 
kokonut said:
So, am I to assume you have a vested interest in Obama?
Click to expand...

Since you don't have a vested interest in Democratic candidates, you really have no reason to be posting about them.

(Doncha hate it when your own words come back to bite you?):laugh2:

BTW: thread is about Cain.
 
kokonut said:
Might want to look at CNN, MSNBC, and CBS, while you're at it, too.
Click to expand...

I was referring to the byline, not the content. Pretty obvious all of the listed networks have a target audience. I just find it pharisaical for you to tell everyone to shut up unless they plan to vote Republican. Feel free to take your own advice regarding Democrats. :ty:
 
kokonut said:
So, am I to assume you have a vested interest in Obama?
Click to expand...

I have a vested interest in most of the republican candidates NOT getting the nomination. Obama? I'm not pleased with him. If Mitt Romney or Ron Paul get the nomination, I will probably abstain from voting. Any other, and I will certainly be voting, just to keep them out.
 
TheWriteAlex said:
I have a vested interest in most of the republican candidates NOT getting the nomination. Obama? I'm not pleased with him. If Mitt Romney or Ron Paul get the nomination, I will probably abstain from voting. Any other, and I will certainly be voting, just to keep them out.
Click to expand...

Well, there are 16 candidates.

Any other and you will be voting? Meaning you'd vote for Obama? BTW, did you vote for Obama in 2008?
 
jillio said:
CAIN: "I will trust the judgment of our military leaders to determine what is torture and what is not torture. That is the critical consideration."

CAIN: "I would return to that policy (waterboarding). I don't see it as torture. I see it as an enhanced interrogation technique."

THE FACTS: Cain's conclusion that waterboarding is a legitimate means of interrogation contradicts the judgment of military leaders _ and his own statement that he would be guided by them. The Army Field Manual prohibits waterboarding. It was the CIA, with the approval of the White House and Justice Department that conducted waterboarding, not the armed forces. As president, Cain could certainly decide that interrogators need not be constrained by the Army Field Manual rules. But if he did so, he would not be letting military leaders determine the tactics.

RealClearPolitics - Politics - Nov 13, 2011 - EDITOR'S NOTE _ An occasional look at how well politicians' statements adhere to the facts.
Click to expand...


Because that is what military experts say ......:giggle:

You are so silly.
 
kokonut said:
So, am I to assume you have a vested interest in Obama?
Click to expand...

probably just as much as your vested interest in Gore... whom you voted for back then.
 
kokonut said:
Well, there are 16 candidates.

Any other and you will be voting? Meaning you'd vote for Obama? BTW, did you vote for Obama in 2008?
Click to expand...

Did you? Oh, no, wait...you were voting the McCain/Palin ticket. Weren't they defeated in a landslide?
 
kokonut said:
Well, there are 16 candidates.

Any other and you will be voting? Meaning you'd vote for Obama? BTW, did you vote for Obama in 2008?
Click to expand...

I think TWA is a Liberal, so that would make the odds of him voting for Obama in 2008....maybe 90%.

In my case, I was trained by my parents to never reveal my votes. Since I vote for both parties, it could have been Obama, it could have been McCain. A lot of times, I vote like TWA; not to elect someone as much as to block someone.
 
saywhatkid said:
I think TWA is a Liberal, so that would make the odds of him voting for Obama in 2008....maybe 90%.

In my case, I was trained by my parents to never reveal my votes. Since I vote for both parties, it could have been Obama, it could have been McCain. A lot of times, I vote like TWA; not to elect someone as much as to block someone.
Click to expand...

So have I but that doesn't stop me.
 
jillio said:
A nationwide Gallup poll released Nov. 9 found that with 45 percent of Republicans believe Romney will be the party’s presidential nominee, with 13 percent naming Cain and 9 percent predicting Texas Governor Rick Perry.
Click to expand...

Guess TWA will be voting. Will Mitt be "catching" a vote from you? :giggle:
 
saywhatkid said:
In my case, I was trained by my parents to never reveal my votes. Since I vote for both parties, it could have been Obama, it could have been McCain. A lot of times, I vote like TWA; not to elect someone as much as to block someone.
Click to expand...

Your parents were wise people. My parents are the same way, and I learned that it was best to not reveal who you voted for.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top