Report: Secret Service Strained to Protect Obama

Status
Not open for further replies.

rockin'robin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
24,430
Reaction score
551
An internal congressional report questioning the ability of the Secret Service to continue fulfilling its duties was leaked to the Boston Globe. The report says the Secret Service is strained by a drastic increase in threats to President Obama, coupled with deep budget cuts. Some are speculating that the agency may need to relinquish all or part of its roles in protecting the country's financial machinery in order to focus resources on the protection of the president and other high-profile leaders.

The report, issued in August by the Congressional Research Service, claimed that if "an evaluation of the service's two missions" were to be done at this time, there's a good possibility that "it might be determined that it is ineffective...to conduct its protection mission and investigate financial crimes." Additionally, an anonymously quoted government official said that many inside the halls of Congress and within the Secret Service itself are questioning whether or not the agency's effectiveness wouldn't be enhanced by transferring some of its responsibilities regarding the investigation of financial crimes over to the Treasury Department.

Talking Points Memo noted that Ronald Kessler, the author of a recently released book on the Secret Service's protection of U.S. presidents, recently said that threats against President Obama are up 400 percent from the number of threats levied against former President George W. Bush, while the size of the agency's staff has only increased by 5.3 percent.

The Southern Poverty Law Center says that the U.S. has seen a 35 percent rise in hate groups in recent years, and few doubt that the discontent stirred up over the election of an African-American president is fueling the rise in threats. But, could the influx of modern technology also be to blame?

As the cost of computer technology has fallen (and accessibility to high-speed Internet service has spread), more and more people are spending more and more time online. Accordingly, these people are doing what people often do on the Internet: sending emails, communicating in chat rooms and on social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace, watching YouTube videos, etc. According to results of a recent study by the Simon Wiesenthal Center, these activities seem to be enhancing the scope of extremist groups' reach:

With over 200 million users, online bigots have to date outpaced efforts to remove them. Some sites have thousands of friends, thus enabling the message of hate to spread virally...This user-generated material increases the viral spread of extremism online and aids in increasing the social acceptability of hate in mainstream discourse. By creating an environment where users are equal participants in the Web, all editorial functions are removed and expressions of hate can easily flow unchallenged.

In other words, extremists once confined to small sects can now congregate on the Internet anonymously and distribute propaganda to millions of people in mere seconds. People with extreme views can also now communicate direct threats to individuals quicker and more easily than they have previously, thanks to the immediacy of email and chat rooms.

In other words, extremists once confined to small sects can now congregate on the Internet anonymously and distribute propaganda to millions of people in mere seconds. People with extreme views can also now communicate direct threats to individuals quicker and more easily than they have previously, thanks to the immediacy of email and chat rooms.

The Secret Service, presently housed under the bureaucratic umbrella of the Department of Homeland Security, was initially established in 1865 to help combat the rise in counterfeiting that took place in that era. The protection of national leaders didn't become a full-time responsibility until William McKinley was assassinated in 1901. Congress passed a law in 1917 making any threat against the president a federal crime, and the responsibility of investigating such threats often falls upon the Secret Service. Along with protecting presidents, the agency's role in policing financial shenanigans was expanded when the 20th century's technological revolution led to a rise in electronic financial transactions.

It should be noted in all of this, however, that the Secret Service has issued a response in which the agency denied any decreased capacity to carry out its missions, saying that the Boston Globe's report was "not accurate and lacks a good deal of information."

Report: Secret Service strained to protect Obama - Yahoo! News
 
Well, there were two actual attempts on Ford, and one actual attempt on Reagan. I think we need to send the Secret Service on vacation, until there is an actual attempt on Obama. That way, we keep things fair and square. :laugh2:
 
6th paragraph...."With over 200 million online users, online bigots have to date outpaced efforts to remove them".
 
so how is this related to this topic? :dunno:

Did Obamas mistreat Secret Service?
It was just an opportunity to post a link to another whining website filled with sore losers. Bwahahahahaha......Obama for the next 3+ years!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
It was just an opportunity to post a link to another whining website filled with sore losers. Bwahahahahaha......Obama for the next 3+ years!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Bwahahahahaha
 
It was interesting to see how Bush I and II, and Reagan treated their SS with respect while others saw them as an annoyance. Interesting to hear their side of the story and how presidents and, even their spouses, behave behind "closed doors." Fascinating insight
 
It was interesting to see how Bush I and II, and Reagan treated their SS with respect while others saw them as an annoyance. Interesting to hear their side of the story and how presidents and, even their spouses, behave behind "closed doors." Fascinating insight

but.... what does that have to do with Obama?
 
Go ahead.

still haven't answered my question. so I repeat - what does that have to do with Obama? Is Obama family mistreating Secret Service agents?
 
still haven't answered my question. so I repeat - what does that have to do with Obama? Is Obama family mistreating Secret Service agents?
I don't even need to read the article to figure out why the Secret Service is strained. It is all these nutjobs that spew anger and hate and slanted "news" in an effort to degrade the leader of the USA. If they wore Iraqi uniforms, and this was Bush, we would go to war. Oh wait....

Gotta love how Rush got punked by the fake Obama college thesis. Nothing like jumping to conclusions and using the airwaves to make a bigger buffoon out of himself; all in the name of Liberal bashing. Makes me wonder about the rest of his sources. Oh wait....he can just go to all these anti-Obama links I see posted around here!

Now perhaps we can stay on topic for once, instead of using every tiny crack in the wall of history to fill with angry white male mortar? It is not about how the Presidents treat the staff, as reported by a website endorsed by Obama haters. It is about the strain on the Secret Service to protect Obama. Who's the college educated poster, and who is the idiot with no degree? At least the idiot can read.
 
Strain beyond incredulity is more like it. Money is no object here since we're spending trillions of dollars of money we don't have and the WH can certainly get and train more SS people for Obama.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top