AllDeaf.com
Mobile - Perks - Advertise - Spy  

Go Back   AllDeaf.com > Deaf Community > Current Events > War & Political News
LIKE AllDeaf on Facebook FOLLOW AllDeaf on Twitter
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 03-22-2010, 08:05 PM   #31 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
No, netrox is just saying that stupid people have to obey the law, too.
jillio is offline  
Alt Today
Deafness

Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com
   
Unread 03-22-2010, 08:10 PM   #32 (permalink)
Audist are not welcome
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: A place where crabs are popular
Posts: 40,505
Blog Entries: 3
I am still learning a lot about this. I want the health care reform to pass but not at the expense of people. If it is fair to business and their employees, then I am all for it. If there are some aspects to it that can hurt people, then I would like to see amendments to it. I am sure it is not going to be perfect science at first.
__________________
"Wine improves with age. The older I get, the better I like it."

--- Anonymous
shel90 is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 08:25 PM   #33 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,433
lol... if the 50 people is true... I can see small companies splitting up into different companies to avoid paying.

My family's company is very easy to split up. I might as well drop the idea by.
posts from hell is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 08:43 PM   #34 (permalink)
Granny Terp
 
Reba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 39,531
Quote:
Originally Posted by yizuman View Post
I see a loophole. Drop all to PT workers, problem avoided.

Yiz
Some businesses use independent contract workers only, rather than hiring them to their company.
Reba is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 09:04 PM   #35 (permalink)
Dream Weaver
 
TXgolfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 18,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reba View Post
Some businesses use independent contract workers only, rather than hiring them to their company.
Yep. The IRS may crack down harder on this but there is a way to beat it legally. Have your workers get a DBA and pay the business name....Perfectly legal. You still 1099 the same way. Another idea is to share your labor with friends you might have in the business. Temps and interns could work too. People will just have to think harder now.
TXgolfer is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 09:08 PM   #36 (permalink)
Registered User
 
kokonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,348
Yep. All perfectly legal, Txgolfer. If businesses cannot make a profit to survive because of idiots in Washington they will certainly fold. Need to retain as much money as legally possible to survive and continue the business.
__________________
Before AD.

After AD.

"Restriction on free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us."
-Thurgood Marshall, former Supreme Court Justice


"... turns out they are telling the truth."
kokonut is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 09:09 PM   #37 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reba View Post
Some businesses use independent contract workers only, rather than hiring them to their company.
Independent contractors are considered to be self employed, are they not?
jillio is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 09:12 PM   #38 (permalink)
Granny Terp
 
Reba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 39,531
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXgolfer View Post
Yep. The IRS may crack down harder on this but there is a way to beat it legally. Have your workers get a DBA and pay the business name....Perfectly legal. You still 1099 the same way. Another idea is to share your labor with friends you might have in the business. Temps and interns could work too. People will just have to think harder now.
As a terp, I do all my business as an independent contractor.
Reba is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 09:16 PM   #39 (permalink)
Dream Weaver
 
TXgolfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 18,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reba View Post
As a terp, I do all my business as an independent contractor.
Excellent. Most of my people were contract labor.

I have a PA now. She is contract labor as well
TXgolfer is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 09:19 PM   #40 (permalink)
Registered User
 
kokonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,348
Contracting is big business. I'm taking a 40 hour course this week on contracting to be a contractor's officer/inspector.
__________________
Before AD.

After AD.

"Restriction on free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us."
-Thurgood Marshall, former Supreme Court Justice


"... turns out they are telling the truth."
kokonut is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 09:22 PM   #41 (permalink)
Registered User
 
yizuman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,370
So there's a law that excepts self employers from having to get health insurance?

Yiz
__________________



yizuman is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 09:24 PM   #42 (permalink)
Dream Weaver
 
TXgolfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 18,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by yizuman View Post
So there's a law that excepts self employers from having to get health insurance?

Yiz
No....but you only have to provide insurance for your employees. Not for contractors.....So one way to beat the mandate would be to fire your employess and use contractors or temps
TXgolfer is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 09:25 PM   #43 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by yizuman View Post
So there's a law that excepts self employers from having to get health insurance?

Yiz
No. Those that are self employed will still be required to have insurance. They just don't have an employer to provide it for them. But that is the way it is now, too. It is one of the consequences you accept when you become self employed.
jillio is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 09:36 PM   #44 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,780
And you have a duty to pay your share for the health care.

Why is it so hard to accept that you should be responsible? Anyone who jettison health insurance is irresponsible, given the fact that it often leads them to be broke and go bankrupt.
netrox is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 09:38 PM   #45 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,780
The government is NOT your enemy. Its goal is to provide you rights, protect you, and assure your welfare.

Teabaggers twist our government to become our "enemy." Tea baggers should be in a party called Meth Party because they show extraordinary paranoia - a common symptom in meth abuse.
netrox is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 09:44 PM   #46 (permalink)
Dream Weaver
 
TXgolfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 18,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by netrox View Post
The government is NOT your enemy. Its goal is to provide you rights, protect you, and assure your welfare.

Teabaggers twist our government to become our "enemy." Tea baggers should be in a party called Meth Party because they show extraordinary paranoia - a common symptom in meth abuse.
It's good common sense to be prepared and to look for LEGAL ways to control your expenses.
TXgolfer is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 09:55 PM   #47 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by netrox View Post
And you have a duty to pay your share for the health care.

Why is it so hard to accept that you should be responsible? Anyone who jettison health insurance is irresponsible, given the fact that it often leads them to be broke and go bankrupt.
Not only that, they ask the rest of society to take up their slack when they don't have insurance and have an unexpected heart attack, stroke, or get diagnosed with cancer. Oh, it's a different story then! They bitch and moan about paying health care premiums that helped to cover others, but when they need the help, their hand is stuck out farther than anyone's and you hear all sorts of whining about how unfair life is.

Just like the ones that run their mouths the loudest against reform, but don't have the courage or the conviction to stand by their supposed principles.
jillio is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 09:56 PM   #48 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,780
I love when old people tell Obama, "Keep the government out of my Medicare!"

LOL!
netrox is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 09:59 PM   #49 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by netrox View Post
I love when old people tell Obama, "Keep the government out of my Medicare!"

LOL!
Another example of complete failure to stand up to the principles that they so loudly proclaim to have.

One thing is certain...the health care debate has served to show the character...or more often, the lack of character...of many.
jillio is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 09:59 PM   #50 (permalink)
Registered User
 
kokonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXgolfer View Post
It's good common sense to be prepared and to look for LEGAL ways to control your expenses.
Nothing wrong in trying to keep your business alive through legal means to help continue to make a profit. What part of business do people do not understand? No business means no jobs for people. Consider the foolish consequences of imposing additional taxes and other mandatory requirements that put additional financial strains increasing the risk of a business folding.
__________________
Before AD.

After AD.

"Restriction on free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us."
-Thurgood Marshall, former Supreme Court Justice


"... turns out they are telling the truth."
kokonut is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 10:02 PM   #51 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
"Legal means" would have to begin with obeying the law of the land.
jillio is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 10:03 PM   #52 (permalink)
Dream Weaver
 
TXgolfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 18,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by kokonut View Post
Nothing wrong in trying to keep your business alive through legal means to help continue to make a profit. What part of business do people do not understand? No business means no jobs for people. Consider the foolish consequences of imposing additional taxes and other mandatory requirements that put additional financial strains increasing the risk of a business folding.
I did that's why I retired....lol
TXgolfer is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 10:08 PM   #53 (permalink)
Registered User
 
kokonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,348
Txgolfer, your example proves exactly the folly of imposing additional taxes to small businesses and other financially burdensome mandatory requirements.
__________________
Before AD.

After AD.

"Restriction on free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us."
-Thurgood Marshall, former Supreme Court Justice


"... turns out they are telling the truth."
kokonut is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 10:11 PM   #54 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Oh, yeah! It causes people to retire!! OMG!!!
jillio is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 10:16 PM   #55 (permalink)
Registered User
 
kokonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXgolfer View Post
I did that's why I retired....lol
Of course, it would require a person to have operated and run a business to know these things and hardship many face forcing them to go out of business. It'd be folly of others who do not know what it's like to be a business owner to think that higher taxes do not hurt. They do. Repercusions go down the line.
__________________
Before AD.

After AD.

"Restriction on free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us."
-Thurgood Marshall, former Supreme Court Justice


"... turns out they are telling the truth."
kokonut is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 10:20 PM   #56 (permalink)
Dream Weaver
 
TXgolfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 18,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by kokonut View Post
Of course, it would require a person to have operated and run a business to know these things and hardship many face forcing them to go out of business. It'd be folly of others who do not know what it's like to be a business owner to think that higher taxes do not hurt. They do. Repercusions go down the line.
I wrote something similar in another thread. I always laugh when I hear people complain about the company the work for. They have no clue what it takes to make things work. Heck if it's that bad start a better one. There are plenty of businesses you can start for next to nothing
TXgolfer is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 10:25 PM   #57 (permalink)
Need Stormtroopers?
 
Foxrac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Zaphias
Posts: 33,215
I'm pro-small business, of course but try to do around to treat small businesses as superior and they are deserved to have big tax break.
__________________


In Moto We Trust

Foxrac is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 10:26 PM   #58 (permalink)
Registered User
 
yizuman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,370
Well if this is a legal loophole from this health care bill, I can see a rise in demand from Temp Agencies. Hire temps and train them to work for an X amount of time and then rotate them out for a new set of employees.

For most Temp Agencies, they loan out their employees for a minimum of 3 months and then that's it. Temp Agencies gives them their last paycheck and they're gone. The temps then go another agency to find work. So I can see Temp Agencies flourishing from this kind of business deal and neither side has to provide Health Insurance because they're not considered full time or permanent workers.

A big savings for both the Temp Agency and the Company that contracts with them.

So I can see a big growth of all sorts of new Temp Agencies looking for a piece of the pie popping up all over the place trying to land contract deals with various companies.

Yiz
__________________



yizuman is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 10:28 PM   #59 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by kokonut View Post
Of course, it would require a person to have operated and run a business to know these things and hardship many face forcing them to go out of business. It'd be folly of others who do not know what it's like to be a business owner to think that higher taxes do not hurt. They do. Repercusions go down the line.
You are going on the assumption that those who are in favor of the current reform are not, nor have they ever been, business owners. WRONG!

The taxes will be raised, once again, on individuals making 200,000 or families making 250,000.
jillio is offline  
Unread 03-22-2010, 10:30 PM   #60 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by yizuman View Post
Well if this is a legal loophole from this health care bill, I can see a rise in demand from Temp Agencies. Hire temps and train them to work for an X amount of time and then rotate them out for a new set of employees.

For most Temp Agencies, they loan out their employees for a minimum of 3 months and then that's it. Temp Agencies gives them their last paycheck and they're gone. The temps then go another agency to find work. So I can see Temp Agencies flourishing from this kind of business deal and neither side has to provide Health Insurance because they're not considered full time or permanent workers.

A big savings for both the Temp Agency and the Company that contracts with them.

So I can see a big growth of all sorts of new Temp Agencies looking for a piece of the pie popping up all over the place trying to land contract deals with various companies.

Yiz
No, temp status won't create a loophole. If a company is using 50 temps, they still have 50 employees. And remember, part time workers figure into that 50.
jillio is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 AM.


Join AllDeaf on Facebook!    Follow us on Twitter!

AllDeaf proudly supports St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Copyright © 2002-2013, AllDeaf.com. All Rights Reserved.