Soldier doubts eligibility, defies president's orders

Status
Not open for further replies.
It has been settled. It is really distressing to see that those who opposed his presidency are such sore loosers. Says something for their character, and it isn't good. This type of person is simply grasping a straws because they cannot come up with anything valid. It is a childish, immature, and bigoted game they play.
 
Did the soldier check FactCheck.org or snope.com on Obama's birth certificate?

Should we demand our Employer for his/her degree skill before we are able to work for them?

:roll:
 
Last edited:
Liebling:-))) said:
Have the soldier check FactCheck.org or snope.com on Obama's birth certificate?

Should we demand our Employer for his/her skill before we are able to work for them?

:roll:
Click to expand...

Neither of this sites are accurate, it's still questions at court level.

No, we can't test soldier's skill or views, they have rights to make voice against Obama, that's part of 1st Amendment.

For me, it's totally up to judge, let them to take care about situation with Obama's birth certificate.
 
Frisky Feline said:
its too late now. lol
Click to expand...

You think? I don't know about how judge is works.

It could be constitution problem when judge find out any president whoever make perjury on their status.
 
The courts have already settled the issue in regards to Obama's birth certificate.

Secondly this behavior is "unbecoming of a solider" for his obstination.
 
Look at the source. World Net Daily. Enough said.
 
Liebling:-))) said:
Did the soldier check FactCheck.org or snope.com on Obama's birth certificate?

Should we demand our Employer for his/her degree skill before we are able to work for them?

:roll:
Click to expand...

check site isn't an answer
 
WND is not a reliable news source. I mean, it is more like The Enquirer. :-P Discussing with friends in military regarding this article. The soldiers have no grounds to stand on. It's inappropriate openly questioning your chain of command. Just saying.
 
the only reason Oboma is being contested is because he is black , so the fuck what His birth certificate is real and has been authenticated multiple times and he has met all other requirements . I really see no point in this racist bullshit .
 
Kateweb said:
the only reason Oboma is being contested is because he is black , so the fuck what His birth certificate is real and has been authenticated multiple times and he has met all other requirements . I really see no point in this racist bullshit .
Click to expand...

Agreed. Anyone seen such a furor made over a white candidate's birth certificate?
 
jillio said:
Agreed. Anyone seen such a furor made over a white candidate's birth certificate?
Click to expand...
Umm, yes. The "question" about McCain's birth eligibility was stirred up during last year's campaign.
 
Reba said:
Umm, yes. The "question" about McCain's birth eligibility was stirred up during last year's campaign.
Click to expand...

A question was raised, and it was answered, and then the issue was dropped. It did not continue on and on and on after proof was provided of place of birth.
 
Still??? :roll:
 
jillio said:
A question was raised, and it was answered, and then the issue was dropped. It did not continue on and on and on after proof was provided of place of birth.
Click to expand...
No, it was brought up several times and not dropped but you might have missed that. Also, the question about McCain's eligibility wasn't in regard to proof of place but citizenship status of said place. I guess you missed that, too.
 
Reba said:
No, it was brought up several times and not dropped but you might have missed that. Also, the question about McCain's eligibility wasn't in regard to proof of place but citizenship status of said place. I guess you missed that, too.
Click to expand...

And, are we still discussing it. Perhaps it was missed because there was not so much of a furor raised as has been raised over Obama's citizenship. Which is exactly my point. Obama opposition latched onto an issue that was settled months ago, and are still continuing to attempt to spread innacuracies that have since been dispelled. His place of birth is not an issue, and has never been an issue, as supported by his certificate of live birth. Let it go. It isn't relevent. Be creative. Find something new that hasn't already been dispelled if you are so intent on discrediting the man. And by you, I mean the collective opposition, not you specifically. To continue to raise issues regarding the man's place of birth shows a total lack of thought and reason.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top