![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 15,644
|
Liberals are Fighting a Losing Battle on Voter ID Laws
For the last month or two, conservative legislatures in many states have been passing laws that require voters to present photo identification before they can vote. These laws were demonized by the left, including Rev. Al Sharpton, saying on MSNBC that "this is the first time in 47 years we have seen such a frontal attack on the voting rights act." While there have been many studies and reports on the true impact of voter fraud, large and unsubstantiated claims from advocates have attracted more attention. New Mexico Secretary of State Diana Duran claimed there were 64,000 cases of possible voter fraud, 10 percent of the number of people who voted in New Mexico.
While it may seem that the GOP's motives to push so hard for these laws is the political advantage, the fact is the majority of Americans feel like this legislation is sensible, so the motives of the legislation are irrelevant to them. It doesn't really seem believable that the GOP would be willing to risk the potential backlash of this legislation just to prevent voter fraud. The Brennan Center for Justice case studies show voter fraud is usually exaggerated and incorrectly reported because of clerical errors. Real confirmed or investigated cases of people committing any type of voter fraud are so minuscule that it makes it hard to believe there is no ulterior motive. The GOP is an incredibly shrewd party, and I think they know that this fit perfectly into the fabricated belief that conservatives are constantly victimized, because of the many claims that it is an attempt to disenfranchise minority voters. It also reverberates with the more extreme members of the party who believe Obama and the big government machine, funded by George Soros, is going to cheat the election and establish some type of Orwellian police state. A poll released by Fox News claimed that 70 percent of people were in favor of voter I.D. measures, and a majority believed that opposition to such measures is an attempt to increase ineligible voter participation. It is fair to assume that those numbers aren't a completely accurate representation of the country, but even if the results are inflated, it does seem like independents and moderate Democrats is a general support for I.D. requirements. The reality is that even though the motivation for it could be perverse and opportunistic, a requirement to present ID to vote is not that burdensome or oppressive. If Democrats continue to challenge this they leave themselves very open to attacks on their commitment to preserving the integrity of democracy. Fighting a losing battle never helps anyone. Liberals are Fighting a Losing Battle on Voter ID Laws - Yahoo! News |
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,348
|
They sure are not screaming over required ID checks for those buying alcoholic drinks. Heck, I've seen people go to voter registration table and present false names, and the people at the table would NOT ask for an ID. Make sense to require ID.
__________________
Before AD. After AD. "Restriction on free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us." -Thurgood Marshall, former Supreme Court Justice "... turns out they are telling the truth." Last edited by kokonut; 04-26-2012 at 10:46 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 15,644
|
Right...and I'm asked for my DL whenever I use my ATM card....Am hoping that anyone/those who vote using fraudulent ID's will be convicted to the full extent of the law....even banned from ever voting again....The upcoming presidential election?....More fraudulent voters.....
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,348
|
Quote:
Need to reduce the cheating in the voting booths by fraudulent means. It just boggles the mind that there are people trying to stop voter ID requirements. Their agenda is obvious. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 15,644
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Need Stormtroopers?
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Zaphias
Posts: 33,196
|
Quote:
Based on my experience, the votes are traditionally not require ID unless you are first time voter like one in IL and CA, in some cases, the poll workers can ask for documents if they think someone may suspect of vote fraud. Some people are placed on provisional voting after failed to show any documents and it means votes will NOT counted so you must present the documents within 5 days. The vote fraud is just much minority, less than 1% but suspicious may be greater than this number and have to rule it out. We do have good law that fight against vote fraud and mandatory photo ID won't help with vote fraud, just very little.
__________________
![]() In Moto We Trust
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Need Stormtroopers?
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Zaphias
Posts: 33,196
|
Quote:
We have good law that deal with vote fraud and I'm not concerned at all. I doubt, it just like in 2004 and 2008.
__________________
![]() In Moto We Trust
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 455
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|