AllDeaf.com
Mobile - Perks - Store - Advertise - Spy  

Go Back   AllDeaf.com > Miscellaneous > On-topic Debates
LIKE AllDeaf on Facebook FOLLOW AllDeaf on Twitter
  
Like Tree571Likes

Closed Thread
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 10-29-2011, 04:48 PM   #31 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
deafskeptic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,512
Too bad there's no Godfather's for me to boycott in Lynchburg.
__________________
Left ear implanted with Med-El on April 24 2007.
Activated on May 9th.
Upgraded to Opus 2 9/10/2010

Think Pink.
FREE JILLIO!
deafskeptic is offline  
Alt Today
Deafness

Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com
   
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:02 PM   #32 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by deafskeptic View Post
Too bad there's no Godfather's for me to boycott in Lynchburg.
jillio is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:13 PM   #33 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,191
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ildri View Post
A) There's a great deal of scientific evidence showing that homosexuality is a natural trait that people are born with, and

B) How can you deny what someone is telling you about their own experiences and feelings? If you said (excuse the flippant example) that your favorite food was pizza, who am I to tell you that no, in fact, it's not?
Where is it? Where is the empirical scientific proof?

If there is none, then it is a matter of opinion.
Steinhauer is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:16 PM   #34 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steinhauer View Post
Where is it? Where is the empirical scientific proof?

If there is none, then it is a matter of opinion.
How about in the medical literature, the biology literature, and the neurological literature? It's all in there. Just because you don't read it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
deafskeptic likes this.
jillio is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:22 PM   #35 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
deafskeptic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,512
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steinhauer View Post
Where is it? Where is the empirical scientific proof?

If there is none, then it is a matter of opinion.
I believe several posters have cited examples. Not our fault some people are unable to understand science.
jillio likes this.
__________________
Left ear implanted with Med-El on April 24 2007.
Activated on May 9th.
Upgraded to Opus 2 9/10/2010

Think Pink.
FREE JILLIO!
deafskeptic is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:29 PM   #36 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by deafskeptic View Post
I believe several posters have cited examples. Not our fault some people are unable to understand science.
Yep. I already referred to the discordance and concordance rates in twin studies, and the effects of prenatal exposure to androgens.
jillio is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:31 PM   #37 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,191
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by deafskeptic View Post
I believe several posters have cited examples. Not our fault some people are unable to understand science.
Not my fault no one provided empirical proof ...
Steinhauer is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:32 PM   #38 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
deafskeptic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,512
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steinhauer View Post
Not my fault no one provided empirical proof ...
Oh, i'm afraid they did.
__________________
Left ear implanted with Med-El on April 24 2007.
Activated on May 9th.
Upgraded to Opus 2 9/10/2010

Think Pink.
FREE JILLIO!
deafskeptic is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:33 PM   #39 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steinhauer View Post
Not my fault no one provided empirical proof ...
It's been provided. You simply don't understand it.
deafskeptic likes this.
jillio is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:35 PM   #40 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,191
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
It's been provided. You simply don't understand it.
No, it has not, and yes, I am intelligent enough to understand it has not been provided.

OPinions have been provided.
Steinhauer is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:35 PM   #41 (permalink)
Expelled
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 11,650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steinhauer View Post
Not my fault no one provided empirical proof ...
Did you choose to be a heterosexual?
Banjo is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:36 PM   #42 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,191
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banjo View Post
Did you choose to be a heterosexual?
Yes.

Any more questions?
Steinhauer is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:37 PM   #43 (permalink)
Expelled
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 11,650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steinhauer View Post
Yes.

Any more questions?
So you did contemplate about becoming a homosexual at one point in your life?
Banjo is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:38 PM   #44 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
deafskeptic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,512
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steinhauer View Post
No, it has not, and yes, I am intelligent enough to understand it has not been provided.

OPinions have been provided.
I'm afraid your posts don't provide much evidence of that.
__________________
Left ear implanted with Med-El on April 24 2007.
Activated on May 9th.
Upgraded to Opus 2 9/10/2010

Think Pink.
FREE JILLIO!
deafskeptic is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:39 PM   #45 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,191
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banjo View Post
So you did contemplate about becoming a homosexual at one point in your life?
Maybe. I can't say for sure, empirically speaking.
Steinhauer is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:39 PM   #46 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steinhauer View Post
No, it has not, and yes, I am intelligent enough to understand it has not been provided.

OPinions have been provided.
I'm afraid you aren't. The twin studies I cited are empirical. The effects of androgen exposure prenatally is empirical. Guess you are just having some problems understanding the details of prenatal development and exactly how complicated and how intricate it is.
jillio is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:39 PM   #47 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,191
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by deafskeptic View Post
I'm afraid your posts don't provide much evidence of that.
Your posts haven't provided empirical proof.
Steinhauer is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:40 PM   #48 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,191
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
I'm afraid you aren't. The twin studies I cited are empirical. The effects of androgen exposure prenatally is empirical. Guess you are just having some problems understanding the details of prenatal development and exactly how complicated and how intricate it is.
That is not empirical proof. It is a study making a "suggestion" of empirical proof.
Steinhauer is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:40 PM   #49 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steinhauer View Post
Your posts haven't provided empirical proof.
Do you understand the meaning of the word "empirical"? Without googling it before you answer?
jillio is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:41 PM   #50 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steinhauer View Post
That is not empirical proof. It is a study making a "suggestion" of empirical proof.
Nope, wrong again.
jillio is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:41 PM   #51 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,191
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Do you understand the meaning of the word "empirical"? Without googling it before you answer?
Yes. Any more questions?

I have one for you - do you understand what scientific proof is, before you go googling it?
Steinhauer is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:42 PM   #52 (permalink)
Expelled
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 11,650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steinhauer View Post
Maybe. I can't say for sure, empirically speaking.
Then you didn't choose to be a heterosexual since you are unsure of it.
Banjo is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:48 PM   #53 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,191
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banjo View Post
Then you didn't choose to be a heterosexual since you are unsure of it.
See ... there you go making assumptions about what I have chosen, or not chosen, what to do.

A matter of opinion ......


Next!
Steinhauer is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:53 PM   #54 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steinhauer View Post
Yes. Any more questions?

I have one for you - do you understand what scientific proof is, before you go googling it?
Yep. I've cited it. You just don't seem to be able to comprehend the words used.
deafskeptic likes this.
jillio is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:54 PM   #55 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steinhauer View Post
See ... there you go making assumptions about what I have chosen, or not chosen, what to do.

A matter of opinion ......


Next!
So, you are claiming that you did not choose to be a heterosexual? Or that you did choose to be a heterosexual. Gotta be one or the other, and either way, you have backed yourself right into that illogical corner you always end up in.
jillio is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 05:58 PM   #56 (permalink)
Aparecium Deletrius Legil
 
Jiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Soprano State
Posts: 60,517
truth. Truth!
__________________
- Don't forget to buy Jiro's Special Edition Sunglasses for $19.95
Jiro is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 06:02 PM   #57 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,191
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
So, you are claiming that you did not choose to be a heterosexual? Or that you did choose to be a heterosexual. Gotta be one or the other, and either way, you have backed yourself right into that illogical corner you always end up in.
No. I am claiming I don't know. That I am unsure.

I see you are quick to judge as usual.
Steinhauer is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 06:14 PM   #58 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steinhauer View Post
No. I am claiming I don't know. That I am unsure.

I see you are quick to judge as usual.
If you are unsure you didn't make a choice to be heterosexual, that means you were born that way. Same way a homosexual is born that way. You did not choose your sexual orientation, and neither does anyone else.
jillio is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 06:24 PM   #59 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiro View Post
truth. Truth!
jillio is offline  
Unread 10-29-2011, 06:27 PM   #60 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
deafskeptic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,512
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiro View Post
truth. Truth!
__________________
Left ear implanted with Med-El on April 24 2007.
Activated on May 9th.
Upgraded to Opus 2 9/10/2010

Think Pink.
FREE JILLIO!
deafskeptic is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 AM.


Join AllDeaf on Facebook!    Follow us on Twitter!

AllDeaf proudly supports St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Copyright © 2002-2013, AllDeaf.com. All Rights Reserved.