![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Banned
|
I see the deaf community is evolving into a new society that is more interfaceable with the hearing society.
We have cochlear implant technology along with oral deaf education leading the deaf society as we know it into a new society where deaf people can interface with the hearing society on their own without the dependence on the 'big deaf industries' that cash in on our special needs. The ASL hardliners are going about the change the same way the oil industry goes about electric cars. With the ASL hardliners having zero abilities to prevent deaf kids from getting their hearing screened, getting the implants , and being raised in an oral environment, it's safe to say that resistance is futile at this evolution of our deaf society. Any comments? Richard Roehm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 343
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 21
|
Megladon,
I would have to agree with Richard to the extent. It is not about staying deaf or seeing the idea of implanation as a threat to our very culture. Although I cannot speak for others, but at some degree, I have to admit that I see the evolution of using cochlear implants as a form of abuse. There are so many parents out there who honestly do not know what to do after finding that their children are deaf. It is safe to say that they often do not make informed decisions regarding to cochlear implants. While it is nothing wrong to choose the best possible option there is for our deaf children, it seems that many parents fail to realize that cochlear implants are in fact a temporary problem to a permanent problem. Improving one person's ability to hear can only go far, even with our latest wonderful technologies. Based on my research, the average hearing person has well over 200 channels to hear and the best cochlear implants we have today can only go up to 27 channels and even so, not everyone can benefit all 27 channels. It is like trying to achive the impossiblity and while focusing on the child's weakest link, it can do a lot of damage to the child's self-esteem. That is very reason why I do not support cochlear implants. It's like giving many of these parents false hope or false sense of security. More than 20 years ago, hearing aid was huge fad, something short of wonderful American dream. My parents thought they were doing me a favor by enrolling me in oral program, urging me to wear hearing aid and forbidding any of my chance to use sign language and ASL was considered a big NO-NO, even today. I had to endure many intensive speech and audoritary training sessions. It often made me feel miserable and incomplete for not being able to "catch up." When my parents finally agreed to let me go to deaf boarding school for my high school years after years of persuasion on my part, it was like a dream finally comes true. Everyone speaks a language where I can understand without any possible misunderstandings or awkwardnesses. The best part is that, as my ASL becomes more fluent, my writing skill soared. I honestly wish more people would open their minds and see ASL as a wonderful addition, not as a threat or substractive language that causes a child to be confused or weaker the child's ability to excel when it comes to learning English. On the final note, while many of you may benefit from wearing cochlear implants, it is important to acknowledge ASL or American Sign Language is indeed a language and no one loses when it comes to learn a new language, right? My two cent worth.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 20,516
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Research facility.
Posts: 3,914
|
Quote:
I’m not knocking cochlear implantation—there’s nothing inherently ‘wrong’ with CI’s. But until the technology improves markedly, it’s just single-sided deafness with a 25 db loss on the hearing side—and of course that 25 db figure is stated in terms of pure tone audiometry. That's better than nothing in most people’s opinion, but it's hardly much to write home about. Oralism, even at it’s best, is like trying to figure out what a jigsaw puzzle’s picture is by assembling the puzzle. You can do it that way if you want, and there’s nothing wrong with that approach, but it’s a hell of a lot easier to just look at the picture on the front of the box. Last edited by Levonian; 06-04-2004 at 05:54 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Actually, a lot of people seem to have misconceptions about the CI process. Some doctors encourage their parents to have their child tested with hearing aids first. If it doesn't seem to work, then they go onto having CIs. I'm really learning a lot from my work as a Deaf Mentor, and some parents actually think differently from what some Deaf militants may think. Some parents have told me that they wanted the best for their child, BUT if their child doesnt want to wear CI that certain day or permanently, then they would respect it. They love the Deaf Culture and try to go to deaf community activities, etc... It's really impressive.
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |||||
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 343
|
Youens, i still think your a bit misguided. I could be wrong but i believe there are now more deaf people then ever before, for a "culture" that is vanishing or has its days numbered, it seems to be growing. As far as parents that do things for their children, i cant fault them for wanting whats best for their child. I can understand you felt horrible going to classes that didnt seem to help, and its a shame your parents made you go, but they must have thought it would help in some way or they wouldnt have made you go. For the life of me i just cant understand what people on alldeaf have against being able to hear. Ci's arnt a problem as someone put it, its not a sure fire fix, its not even a unlikely fix, its an aid to help people that would like to be able to hear, and what is really wrong with that if someone wants to hear? I could go into what i feel is the problem, but at this point in the day i'm not up for a fight and would rather not get booted for voicing my oppinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
Richard Roehm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | ||
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Alberta,Canada
Posts: 13,626
|
otherwise, My far concern about CI... I'm not in position ci .. I've seen some of my peepz who has CI.. which there have expense lot of money to have an operation cost and Mapping/Audiogoily/re-call/appointment to attend oralisim/and much more. Feel more increase purity all over your shoulder cost you more unpatience attend.
Hosp/Doctors and others are trying to get your $$$ lot of money and in case future changed better techogly than old ones and have to replace cost you more another operation. Would be more challenge fear? Hearing Aid still cheaper but not 100% fully of hear as well isn't same of CI's typicial, of course.. How can make Advocacy for DHH/HH cost expense ?? I do not think so! On your own pocket and expense reilable of your insurance whoever willing pay 100% or less whatever depend on insurance cost willing coverage or not. I do disagree with parent who trying to be child's happy future comes w/ci.. ? Nope.. All expections by parent happy not child! Depend on child or teenage or Adult whatever, name it.. which there have prodfound Deaf and impossible have ci.. can way possible provide ci will come works ? "Following up the db of percent" If course too long way and cost you eating up your expense money.. Isn't fun for challenge ? btw... Still counts lot of money expense for that..
__________________
Parent's proud our children.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 343
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | ||||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tucson
Posts: 4,425
|
Quote:
in first email; Quote:
Quote:
Internal Implant Technical Specifications: Information update rate: 90,000 updates per second Stimulation rate: 83,000 pulses per second Independent output circuits: 16 <---- Information channels: 16 with current HiResolution software <---- Internal Memory Stimulation Strategies: Simultaneous, partially simultaneous, and non-simultaneous options including HiRes (HiRes-P and HiRes-S) and emulation of MPS and CIS with current software. Pulsatile or analog waveforms Monopolar or bipolar coupling (expandable to multi-polar with future software *) Patented HiFocus Electrode: 16 electrode contacts that are designed to focus stimulation toward the nerve fibers Diagnostics: Neural Response Imaging (NRI) Telemetry: Bi-Directional communication link ====== Have a great weekend!
__________________
Boult ![]() I am a CI Borg, Proud to be and loving it!MYTHS AND LIES ABOUT CI / New Chat Rooms Social / Paleo and Primal Lifestyle / Get a Mac Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
If a CI will work for somebody, especially a deaf child, I feel like the parents should definitely go for it. While I am hearing, I don't think life a deaf person, however...I have had the experience of music, sounds, speech, and hearing. I feel that if somebody CAN experience this, then they SHOULD.
Music is huge, I can't imagine life without it. I've got it on right now. I would get a CI just for that if I had to. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 343
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Wait a sec.....first Nesmuth posts that the Deaf community is changing and then his next post says that it's dying. Huh? That doesn't make any sense whatsoever. There are STILL some parents who are raising their kids with Sign only, and there are still many parents who are raising their kids with TC. Even many of the kids who receive an oral education will pick up Sign as their second language. We'll have to wait a few years to see if the doomsayers predictions are in fact correct. I think that the Deaf community IS changing...in a good way. More people are realizing that it's not about how much hearing you do or don't have that makes you Deaf...and that's good b/c it opens up the Deaf community to more hoh people....hey it'll open up the Deaf culture to hearing people who use Sign as their primary language due to things like tracheostomies, apraxia and things like that.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
V.I.P. Member
![]() |
Hmm, *reflective look*.....
I am not militant nor will I ever be. But I must say I agree with many aspects of what Youens and Deafdyke said.
__________________
"Walking with a friend in the dark is better than walking alone in the light." - Helen Keller |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 15,794
|
I don't know....when the originator of this topic threw this out for our edification, I think he did so just to have us say what we think; not necessarily that he was railing against it. For all we know, he may be jumping up and down with glee at this supposed evolution. He's not"retarted"(sic).....just throwing out something for us to talk about, jeezzz.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 343
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Banned
|
Response to my thread
I find the response to be very interesting. Community seems to take a softer than expected tone toward evolution of society and I'm confident we wont be expecting quasi-terrorist actions from the ASL zealots over the CI issue.
Richard Roehm |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 21
|
"Community seems to take a softer than expected tone toward evolution of society and I'm confident we wont be expecting quasi-terrorist actions from the ASL zealots over the CI issue."
Richard, what do you expect? Many of us are well aware that larger society have somewhat misunderstood views of deaf people or how we want to THROW out CI to preserve our culture. It isn't true. Not at all. We just want the public to be aware of possible dangers for discouraging their deaf children to learn ASL. (In order to make CI devices work, one must undergo intensive trainings, especially in cases with prelinguistic deaf children.) I like to consider myself having a black belt in using ASL, but I find it rather unhealthy to uphold militant attitude against the world. It's our job to educate people, not to blame them or work with them instead of against them. If you honestly want stronger tone, be my guest and if I am right, it's highly likely that you'd receive less support by using that approach. I like to think of in this way, we as a society are changing for better. Don't speak of us, join us. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 343
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California
Posts: 23
|
Deaf Society is going thru changes
I am not necessarilly against CI, oral, Deafies or ASL but I am learning and yes, remain ignorant about some of the issues.
In my opinion, I am against putting CI in a young deaf child as I know a few who disgarded CIs when they got older. They are still deaf. Having gone thru speech therapy and wearing phonic ears for years, I am pleased with the results for myself as they are worth it. I even learned sign language at a young age. My family are supportive. Understand this, parents want the very best for their deaf children. When the deaf or hoh children get older, they will make choices as individuals regarding their communication modes, hearing devices or their identities. That can change over the years. I was talking to a friend another day and he said that Gallaudet College is struggling to keep losing their federal funding by accpeing students with their reading and writing grade levels like for example, 5th grade, to keep the quota. Oh goodness. I now wonder what will happen to Gallaudet if this trend continues. The reason why? More and more deaf and hoh are choosing to go to colleges near their home or other states. We have to face the fact...the dynamics in deaf society are changing so we have to go with the flow. ASL will be still there but on a smaller scale. We don't know how fast that number will shrink. It is sad...but we can preserve ASL somehow. There will be other choices for us as individuals-our right to communnicate in a way we want to, our right to pick our identity, and to decide what is right even if we think if it is not right. Even I don't really go on well with oralists. I cannot lipread as I cannot see that well. I don't know if they want to use sign or write. Sigh...It is frustrating. Change is alway part of our lives so we need to go with the flow. blue120
Last edited by blue120; 08-30-2004 at 12:38 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
Hardliners
Sometimes I meet deaf people who want to be "left alone" by the hearing. Yet they want every benefit that comes form tax dollars.
When people say "CI can be paid for" they forget it is tax money from everyone, hearing or deaf that is used. I don't know if the CI and big business part is true, but I do know that you do not have to hate or mistreat the hearing just to maintain deaf culture, nor do you have to prevent the deaf from hearing. There is something very unique about growing up D/deaf which I'm sure I may never understand, but I try. Sometimes, it seems people who are deaf only want to be around other deaf people to avoid communications problems. However, isolation is not the answer. And isolation will happen for as long as Deaf and Hearing don't try to communicate. Go teach a hearie ASL today. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 85
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
That is only about 20% higher then it was when we were young. Oral deaf education has been around for hundreds of years and yet we Deafies are STILL here and living and growing!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|