Originally Posted by Liebling:-)))

Yes I can understand your point, Ideafspy ...

Example like this.
http://www.alldeaf.com/strange-stupid-news/25686-first-grader-suspended-sex-harassment.html

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,163844,00.html

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=45477

http://www.alldeaf.com/showthread.ph...ht=belly+dance

I remember the link somewhere at other forum that a mother won at court battle because the photo developer informed authorities after saw the picture of her with her baby son in the bath at 2 years ago. I will provide the link here when I find.

This is an example what Ideafspy tried to point out. I'm agree that it's too extreme when someone label you as sex offender when you bath with your baby or kiss your baby's tummy...

And other worst example, I never forget rest of my life... I was one of supporters who help 11-year-old Swiss-American Raoul Wuthrich to free from prison in America. They handccuffed him because neighbor report Police that she saw him pull down his 5 years old sister's pants and touch her private part. US law consider him as sex offender "sexually molester". He is only help his sister urinate... I just can't beleive how extreme the law to consider children as sex offender. He went back to home in Switerzland and visit to therapy. It must be bad nightmare for him...

Interesting link... Worth to read. I don't know either you heard about this or not.
http://www.worldlymind.org/swissboy.htm#free

I can image what if police saw Danny help Alan urinate in America... It must be scary nightmare for me as parent... Of course Danny help Alan urinate voluntarily when Alan was a little boy. My hubby or I bath with our boys when they were babies/toddlers. It doesn't bother European law because they know it's not sex offence. Of course took picture of me or hubby with our children in the bath... It doesn't bother photo developer as well.

They surely take serious if they see picture of child porn... etc.




It must be scare to consider 18 years old as sex offender because he had sex with 17 years old. I can image what if police handcuffed my 24 years old Dad for make my 17 years old mother pregnant in America because the parents report police on my Dad. It must be scare when I picture my parents.




But... but... One big thing is SEX OFFENDER TOUCH INNONCENT CHILDREN IS NOT ACCEPTANCE...

Originally Posted by Liebling:-)))

Yes I'm agree that he's sick and need a professional help to find out himself why he do that.

I can image how you feel when he tell you how he feel for little girls


I would advise you to ignore if creator create his/her thread when you feel it affect you and talk in general way without name instead of point finger each other because the creator did not name you in his/her thread. Please don't feel bad but stand yourself because it's you who withness it, not anyone. You has no reason to feel bad because the creator create a thread.

Originally Posted by ideafspy

I know what the different to have without childern or with childern. Thank you very much I appericate with your words.

However; if you know person and that went roll off that he or she didn't do anything but help. If you conerise this and then I will said that you are zip both your eyes and attach yourself as selftem too much. So its no need said, "Most of us have children" because do Deaf need keep SSI to be fed them instead have their children?