jillio

In that particular case, no. But nice attempt to make it appear so by taking the post out of context. You're taking McCain tactics to close to heart.

Deafness

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com

jillio

Obviously.

jillio

Prejudice like that is not only stupid, it is dangerous, as shown by the 3 that were arrested.

jillio

It is called a benefit. The employer pays it, just as most employers contibute to retirement plans. Benefits are part of a wage package.

Liebling:-)))

[QUOTE]I see nothing wrong if Michelle like to copy Jackie´s taste... *shrug*



*shake my head quietly*

__________________

Liebling:-)))

Ditto


What´s kind of respect?

__________________

BradB08

If she truly supported the troops, she'd vote for Barack Obama.

McCain doesn't care enough about the troops. He didn't support the new G.I Bill and he thinks Iraq is going perfectly.

Liebling:-)))

*nodding agreement*

Yes I know he don´t support GI bill for war veterans because he think GI bill is too generous for war veterans...

It proves that McCain support war, not troops... It´s sad that some people don´t understand the difference between support the war and support the troops.

__________________

jillio

Exactly. Supporting the troops is quite different from supporting the war.

Liebling:-)))

Exactly

__________________

Byrdie714

Actually I feel sorry for the Moderators--Vampy, Jolie, SG--because two months is going to be a long time in coming!

I am looking forward to November--the one thing I noticed is that Palin's investigation will announce their findings on October 31.

Coincidence that it will be on Hallowe'en! It could be scary for the Republicans or for the Democrats.

Reba

Neither I nor other ADers are candidates. There is no reason we can't debate the issues without calling each rude names or using the "f" word over and over again.

You do have one suggestion that I might have to take up. It might be time for me to exit the kitchen. Not because I can't "take the heat" but because the stench in the kitchen is becoming unappetizing.

Reba

It's a tax, and it's paid by tax payers. No, it's not like a contribution to a retirement plan any more than paying the Social Security tax is a contributory "benefit." It's required by law for the "contributors". The IRS is not in the business of benefit packages.

Byrdie714

I love your humor Reba!

PuyoPiyo

Exactly. By the law, it's still the taxes.

jillio

Cuttin' it close. Probably hoping that it will get buried under other issues during the campaign and people won't notice the findings.

Yep, scary stuff!

jillio

Employees do not pay this tax or have it withheld from their pay.

It is paid by employers. It provides unemployment compensation to workers who have lost their jobs. Unemployment compensation is a benefit. That is why the BWC calls checks issued a "benefit check" and determines who is eligible for "benefits."

Reba

Guess what. Employers are tax payers, too.

They can call it anything they like but those "benefits" are paid for with taxes that are paid by taxpayers.

Taxpayers are no less taxpayers just because they are employers.

BardB08's original statement (with which you concurred) was, "Unemployment is paid through wages, not by taxpayers."
http://www.alldeaf.com/1075282-post150.html

That is to what I was referring. I have shown that the unemployment compensation fund is paid into by taxpayers (employers).

web730

Sorry, Reba (hi btw)... your last comment might have gone into the thin air due that jillio was banned. But sure enough, you made a good point.

jillio

Yes, business owners are taxpayers, too. However the implication that began this discussion what that the unemployment benefits were taken directly from the employee's check. This is incorrect.

Jiro

Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe I stated that unemployment benefit is covered by tax payers. Someone (either brad or jillio) corrected me that it is paid by employer. Good catch there, Reba. Both employer and employee ARE tax payers.

BradB08

I don't really care as long as I'm covered in case I get laid off again.

Collected them once. Don't want to go back to that.

Jiro

is the time limit same for all or does it vary? does it have maximum time limit?

BradB08

Usually lasts until your benefits run out.

Benefits depend on how much you and employer put in.

Liebling:-)))

*scratch my head*

Some of you have no problem to pay tax to support war issues, support low income/unemployment people with medicard, etc without including for yourself but problem with healthcare for all people including yourself?

I work hard to pay tax for anyone and then plus extra pay insurance coverage for myself...? BIG Nooooooooo...

I really have no problem to pay social insurances and taxes because we all get treatment, not for just someone only without myself. I will also get full treatment as well when I´m out of work or pension. I also will get money from unemployment benefit and also social assistance when I´m out of work. I prefer to pay social insurances and taxes for ourselves over war issues and medicard for someone else.

McCain wants to tax health benefits paid by employers which mean means is raising taxes on American workers while he wants rich companies to get tax deductions.

__________________

Brian

Liebling, you work for the U.S. Government overseas, right?

Liebling:-)))

What´s your question do with this thread here?


Just wondering

__________________

Byrdie714

Varies from state to state.

Reba

It's just as valid as your post #235. If your post fits this thread, so does Brian's post.

Jiro

huh? Who said we don't have problem to pay tax to support war issues? That is incredibly ignorant thing to say. It's not like we have a choice to choose where our tax money goes to. and no we don't pay tax DIRECTLY to war. But you know what? You paid for your gas, right? You are, in essence, funding the war... especially terrorists therefore.... you are a Domestic Dissent (j/k)

It is very nice of you to care about others at your expense but that just doesn't fly for me. I'm fine with government programs to fund and help them to find jobs and stuff but I do not believe in allowing poor people having equal benefits as the rich (especially health benefits). That's not just right and it's unfair. They can go move to Europe or a communist state if they want no class distinctions. Beside - they shouldn't complain. There are abundant of charity programs, churches, free shelters, free clinics, etc. it's better than nothing. The reason why people say it doesn't work well is because there are far too many leechers than the needy ones.

I understand that you live in a socialist state all your life so it's hard for you to understand the way of American life. You grew up being used to paying high tax, high gas price, and high etc. You're used to living with a very modest means. Just think of America as opposite of your lifestyle.

This whole social welfare program modeled after EU is just not going to work in here.