AllDeaf.com
Our Sponsors

Go Back   AllDeaf.com > Miscellaneous > On-topic Debates
  
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-22-2008, 08:55 AM   #31 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 17,287
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liebling:-))) View Post
And?
And what? Why so testy today? I just thought it was an interesting site. People can find out about the Congressmen of their own states, and compare them to others. It's just interesting. It's no big deal. If you're not interested, don't go there.
Reba is offline   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Deafness

Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com
   
Old 08-22-2008, 09:00 AM   #32 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 17,287
. . . and if he did know every detail of his portfolio, people would call him a micromanaging nit picker.
Reba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 10:50 AM   #33 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Byrdie714's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pacific County, Washington
Posts: 5,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deaf Mortgage View Post
I am sure in the beginning McCain must have spent many years building his financial freedom. Once you reach to a point where you can afford someone to take over and manage your estate, that when you know you do not need to worry how much money in bank, or how many houses you own, or how many car you own.
Granted that may be true but still....how do you know those investors are trustworthy with your money? Afterall, we've had heard of investors making poor choices with people's money. Myself--I like to know where my money is and where it's going and why.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reba View Post
Just to keep things in perspective, that same linked story stated:

The Obamas aren't exactly poor themselves.
The difference between Obama and McCain is that McCain "married" into money whereas the Obamas are self-made millionaires.

Big difference between the two.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reba View Post
. . . and if he did know every detail of his portfolio, people would call him a micromanaging nit picker.
Wouldn't you want a President that knows the details of every little thing that passes by his desk before he signs off on it?

Nothing wrong with a micromanaging nit picker--it just shows that one actually pays attention to the details.
Byrdie714 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 10:59 AM   #34 (permalink)
Got Mortgage?
 
Deaf Mortgage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Loon State
Posts: 895
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byrdie714 View Post
Granted that may be true but still....how do you know those investors are trustworthy with your money? Afterall, we've had heard of investors making poor choices with people's money. Myself--I like to know where my money is and where it's going and why.



The difference between Obama and McCain is that McCain "married" into money whereas the Obamas are self-made millionaires.

Big difference between the two.



Wouldn't you want a President that knows the details of every little thing that passes by his desk before he signs off on it?

Nothing wrong with a micromanaging nit picker--it just shows that one actually pays attention to the details.
If you give good tip your broker or investor profile agent, they will take care of your estate without a problem. They will be very happy to take care of your profile. When you get to the point of where your profile is very diversified, you don't have to worry about one bad investment.

Donald Trump has several bad investment but he still filthy rich. Why? Its because Donald diversified his profile to many type of investment. He not worried anymore.

Same with McCain.
Deaf Mortgage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 11:15 AM   #35 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,197
[quote=Byrdie714;1070268]Granted that may be true but still....how do you know those investors are trustworthy with your money? Afterall, we've had heard of investors making poor choices with people's money. Myself--I like to know where my money is and where it's going and why.



The difference between Obama and McCain is that McCain "married" into money whereas the Obamas are self-made millionaires.

Big difference between the two.



Wouldn't you want a President that knows the details of every little thing that passes by his desk before he signs off on it?

Nothing wrong with a micromanaging nit picker--it just shows that one actually pays attention to the details.[/QUOTE]

Do we really want a President that is not detail oriented? I think not.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 11:17 AM   #36 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by jiro123 View Post
yea well.... he's been tremendously busy with this Presidential race, you know. sometimes you'd forget how much a milk carton costs now when you're fighting to win a seat at White House... a once-in-the-lifetime chance
You have finally slipped completely over the edge!
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 11:47 AM   #37 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 17,287
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byrdie714 View Post
The difference between Obama and McCain is that McCain "married" into money whereas the Obamas are self-made millionaires.

Big difference between the two.

Wouldn't you want a President that knows the details of every little thing that passes by his desk before he signs off on it?

Nothing wrong with a micromanaging nit picker--it just shows that one actually pays attention to the details.
The point about their money was that they are both wealthy. It's not a matter of rich Republicans vs poor Democrats. There are also wealthy Democrats who marry money (John Kerry) or inherit it (Ted Kennedy).

The best CEOs don't micromanage. The best senior military leaders don't micromanage. They have staffs for that. The top executive needs to see the big picture, deal with the other top dogs, and delegate the execution of strategies to the right people.

Anyone who has worked under a micromanaging boss knows how little gets accomplished.
Reba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 12:37 PM   #38 (permalink)
Cranial protocologist
 
Liza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: St Augustine, FL
Posts: 4,189
Blog Entries: 2
Lucky old bastard! LOL
Liza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 12:59 PM   #39 (permalink)
YOU DOMESTIC DISSENT!
 
Jiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liebling:-))) View Post
awwww.... Itīs only imaginable.... I wasnīt realize that you donīt understand the humor..

What I said that "Iīm not surprised" is not humor but serious because itīs not just houses, he donīt know but more... (Iīm sure that you remember the list, I made for him in other thread what he donīt know....)
I do understand it but it's a joke gone sour. lol
Jiro is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 12:59 PM   #40 (permalink)
YOU DOMESTIC DISSENT!
 
Jiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liebling:-))) View Post
Well many famous people know how many houses everywhere in the world they own and also banks as well...
let's see if they can keep track of everything while they run for presidency
Jiro is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 01:06 PM   #41 (permalink)
YOU DOMESTIC DISSENT!
 
Jiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byrdie714 View Post
Granted that may be true but still....how do you know those investors are trustworthy with your money? Afterall, we've had heard of investors making poor choices with people's money. Myself--I like to know where my money is and where it's going and why.

The difference between Obama and McCain is that McCain "married" into money whereas the Obamas are self-made millionaires.

Big difference between the two.

Wouldn't you want a President that knows the details of every little thing that passes by his desk before he signs off on it?

Nothing wrong with a micromanaging nit picker--it just shows that one actually pays attention to the details.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Do we really want a President that is not detail oriented? I think not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reba View Post
The best CEOs don't micromanage. The best senior military leaders don't micromanage. They have staffs for that. The top executive needs to see the big picture, deal with the other top dogs, and delegate the execution of strategies to the right people.

Anyone who has worked under a micromanaging boss knows how little gets accomplished.
Reba speaks the truth. so do many management books. Read "The Lazy Millionaire" for starter. If you micromanage everything especially as the President, you'll never get anything done.

this shows Obama does not know how to manage a large scale operation like.... government agencies. this shows how naive Obama is on how the world really works. this FURTHER shows Obama's inexperience.
Jiro is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 01:58 PM   #42 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by jiro123 View Post
Reba speaks the truth. so do many management books. Read "The Lazy Millionaire" for starter. If you micromanage everything especially as the President, you'll never get anything done.

this shows Obama does not know how to manage a large scale operation like.... government agencies. this shows how naive Obama is on how the world really works. this FURTHER shows Obama's inexperience.
Obviously, you don't understand the concept of "detail oriented".

And I bet Obama knows how many houses he owns!
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 02:34 PM   #43 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 17,287
I prefer my President stay focused on my country's business rather than his personal money-making business or any monkey business..
Reba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 04:10 PM   #44 (permalink)
YOU DOMESTIC DISSENT!
 
Jiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Obviously, you don't understand the concept of "detail oriented".

And I bet Obama knows how many houses he owns!
oh gee I'm sorry that you want the President to care about trivial things that his staff can handle. I'm sure Obama would know how many houses he owns.... judging from his background... of course.. he's certainly not a very busy political man!

President of USA is not a detail-oriented job. It's an intense management-oriented job, silly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reba View Post
I prefer my President stay focused on my country's business rather than his personal money-making business or any monkey business..
Jiro is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 06:57 PM   #45 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Byrdie714's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pacific County, Washington
Posts: 5,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by jiro123 View Post
oh gee I'm sorry that you want the President to care about trivial things that his staff can handle. I'm sure Obama would know how many houses he owns.... judging from his background... of course.. he's certainly not a very busy political man!

President of USA is not a detail-oriented job. It's an intense management-oriented job, silly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reba View Post
The point about their money was that they are both wealthy. It's not a matter of rich Republicans vs poor Democrats. There are also wealthy Democrats who marry money (John Kerry) or inherit it (Ted Kennedy).

The best CEOs don't micromanage. The best senior military leaders don't micromanage. They have staffs for that. The top executive needs to see the big picture, deal with the other top dogs, and delegate the execution of strategies to the right people.

Anyone who has worked under a micromanaging boss knows how little gets accomplished.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Obviously, you don't understand the concept of "detail oriented".
And I bet Obama knows how many houses he owns!
Plus what is wrong with micro-management? An individual who micromanages obviously knows the company, inside-out. The individual is being detailed oriented.

The people who complain about being micromanage obviously have trouble following orders from their bosses and therefore should look for another job.

I would rather have a President that micromanages as they are detail oriented instead of leaving things in a gray area where one has to assume.
Byrdie714 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 07:23 PM   #46 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Tousi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byrdie714 View Post
Plus what is wrong with micro-management? An individual who micromanages obviously knows the company, inside-out. The individual is being detailed oriented.

The people who complain about being micromanage obviously have trouble following orders from their bosses and therefore should look for another job.

I would rather have a President that micromanages as they are detail oriented instead of leaving things in a gray area where one has to assume.
Byrdie, I think the term, "micro managing" has negative connotations 9 times out of 10....
Tousi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 07:41 PM   #47 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 17,287
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byrdie714 View Post
Plus what is wrong with micro-management? An individual who micromanages obviously knows the company, inside-out. The individual is being detailed oriented.

The people who complain about being micromanage obviously have trouble following orders from their bosses and therefore should look for another job.

I would rather have a President that micromanages as they are detail oriented instead of leaving things in a gray area where one has to assume.
A person who micro manages does not necessarily know the business inside out. It just means the manager doesn't have faith in the abilities of those below him in the chain of command.

One of the most devestating entries on a corporate or military member's annual fitness report is "needs constant supervision."

Any leader who hasn't selected subordinates who can seamlessly and quickly pick up the reins when necessary isn't doing his job.

A leader who is clear about his goals and his standards won't have any "gray" areas
Reba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 09:00 PM   #48 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reba View Post
I prefer my President stay focused on my country's business rather than his personal money-making business or any monkey business..
If he can't stay focused on his own, I question how well he can focus on the country's.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 09:02 PM   #49 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by jiro123 View Post
oh gee I'm sorry that you want the President to care about trivial things that his staff can handle. I'm sure Obama would know how many houses he owns.... judging from his background... of course.. he's certainly not a very busy political man!

President of USA is not a detail-oriented job. It's an intense management-oriented job, silly.


You find it trivial, but I would imagine that the number of people who have lost their only home to foreclosure as a result of the Bush's distrastrous policies and federal spending would find it pertinent, indeed.

Perhaps you don't see it as a "detail oriented" job, but that is just indication of your failure to understand the concept.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 10:42 PM   #50 (permalink)
YOU DOMESTIC DISSENT!
 
Jiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
You find it trivial, but I would imagine that the number of people who have lost their only home to foreclosure as a result of the Bush's distrastrous policies and federal spending would find it pertinent, indeed.

Perhaps you don't see it as a "detail oriented" job, but that is just indication of your failure to understand the concept.
sorry pal but you shouldn't be picking on only me. Are you saying Reba failed to understand the concept too?

I'd like to see you work at even mid-level corporation or any large organization. then you can come back and tell us of your finding. Micro-managing a large corporation (or a large organization) means you do not have faith in it and... in your shrink term - a control freak. This practice is widely regarded as ineffective in many management courses and books. Please go to your local bookstore and pick out a couple of business books. I recommend The Lazy Millionaire (easy read for beginner). I'd like to suggest a few more famous world-wide top-selling books but I have a feeling you'd disagree with most.

General von Manstein's (Germany army) wisdom -
Quote:
There are only 4 types of officer: First, there are the lazy, stupid ones. Leave them alone, they do no harm.

Second, there are the hard-working intelligent ones. They make excellent staff officers, ensuring that every detail is properly considered.

Third, there are the hard-working, stupid ones. These people are a menace and must be fired at once.

Finally, there are the intelligent lazy ones. They are suited for the highest office.
Jillio - sounds like you're the 2nd. Same for Obama.
Jiro is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2008, 01:22 AM   #51 (permalink)
My 3 darling princesses
 
Liebling:-)))'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 27,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
If he can't stay focused on his own, I question how well he can focus on the country's.
thatīs exact what I am going to ask her about.
__________________
Liebling:-))) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2008, 01:32 AM   #52 (permalink)
My 3 darling princesses
 
Liebling:-)))'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 27,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reba View Post
. . . and if he did know every detail of his portfolio, people would call him a micromanaging nit picker.
Do you have the problem with that micromangaging nit picker? I donīt but consider him as a caring persident for show his interest on his peopleīs welfare and country. Pay attention is the mainly important than "don`t know".
__________________
Liebling:-))) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2008, 01:37 AM   #53 (permalink)
My 3 darling princesses
 
Liebling:-)))'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 27,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by jiro123 View Post
Please go to your local bookstore and pick out a couple of business books. I recommend The Lazy Millionaire (easy read for beginner)
Do you want "The Lazy Millionarie" to be the president of USA?
__________________
Liebling:-))) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2008, 01:42 AM   #54 (permalink)
YOU DOMESTIC DISSENT!
 
Jiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liebling:-))) View Post
Do you want "The Lazy Millionarie" to be the president of USA?
lol don't take it too literally. The title can be bit confusing. That's why you should read the book to understand exactly what the author meant about the title. It's an outstanding basic book and a very easy read. I highly recommend it. it can greatly help you to build a discipline with your personal managements (home, social life, managing bills, etc.) or anything in life.

of course... other famous old books are - "The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People" and "The Intelligent Investor" (hard read). These books say the same - a boss who micromanages everything IS INEFFECTIVE unless you're a masochist (it actually said that!) and you live in office.
Jiro is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2008, 01:42 AM   #55 (permalink)
YOU DOMESTIC DISSENT!
 
Jiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liebling:-))) View Post
Do you have the problem with that micromangaging nit picker? I donīt but consider him as a caring persident for show his interest on his peopleīs welfare and country. Pay attention is the mainly important than "don`t know".
there's a difference between nit picker leader and a effective leader. Great leader chooses competent, qualified top men who follow and understand the President's agenda and entrust important decisions to them. He will do the follow-up meeting perhaps once a week or so to hear the progress. He will be immediately notified by them or his secretary for any situation that requires his immediate attention. Now that's an effective, smart leader.

Nit-picker leader who handles everything himself WILL NEVER GET ANYTHING DONE. IT'S IMPOSSIBLE IN THIS ENORMOUSLY LARGE-SCALE ORGANIZATION AND HAS BEEN PROVEN INEFFECTIVE BY MANY EXPERTS!!!! If Obama wants to micro-manage it, he should be Secretary of ---- or be the top boss of a certain agency.

Oh BTW - Bill Clinton did not micromanage USA. He was simply bold and influential