Cops's Gun vs Taser Shock

~♥~Pinky~♥~ · 07-29-2008, 05:19 PM

I just thought to make a thread. I want to know about Gun and Taser shock between. It's American's choice to use a gun or taser shock. Gun can cause die. I heard taser shock can cause die too. is that right? You can discuss about Gun and Taser Shock between here.

Bottesini · 07-29-2008, 05:22 PM

Less likely to die from a tazer shock. I would hope guns would be the absolute last resort of police officers.

PowerON · 07-29-2008, 05:50 PM

It's better to freeze them without harm warm-blood. then it would rocks and safe.

~♥~Pinky~♥~ · 07-29-2008, 09:49 PM

Okay...

Tell us about your opinions. Which is the best safe for gun or taser shock for suspects people?

***VamPyroX*** · 07-30-2008, 12:27 AM

I'm not really worried about using tasers instead of guns, but my bigger worry is the fact that more and more police officers are using tasers more often for things that they could have done without using a taser.

Jiro · 07-31-2008, 12:17 AM

I highly highly highly support the use of Taser as the frontline defense weapon. The gun is always always the last resort because it is a deadly force and people will die.

jillio · 07-31-2008, 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VamPyroX

I'm not really worried about using tasers instead of guns, but my bigger worry is the fact that more and more police officers are using tasers more often for things that they could have done without using a taser.

**nodding agreement** It would appear that as they are less deadly, the officers are much quicker to use them, and are using them excessively. That is real reason for concern.

***VamPyroX*** · 07-31-2008, 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jillio

**nodding agreement** It would appear that as they are less deadly, the officers are much quicker to use them, and are using them excessively. That is real reason for concern.

I guess the cops are getting lazy and think that using the taser is the solution to everything.

Texan Guy · 07-31-2008, 02:13 AM

Either.....but remember, taser shock has a very, very limited range. I rather the cops to have the pepperbag guns than taser shock. More range than taser shock, of course.

But I'd say, let the cops to have it both. They will need the gun, they'll never know if a suspect is armed or not.

jillio · 07-31-2008, 03:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VamPyroX

I guess the cops are getting lazy and think that using the taser is the solution to everything.

It sure looks that way.

Jiro · 07-31-2008, 03:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Texan Guy

Either.....but remember, taser shock has a very, very limited range. I rather the cops to have the pepperbag guns than taser shock. More range than taser shock, of course.

But I'd say, let the cops to have it both. They will need the gun, they'll never know if a suspect is armed or not.

but then... they could die of asthma attack or allergy...

Wokamuka · 07-31-2008, 11:01 AM

Why should the majority be weighed down by a bunch of crippled or defective people, anyway? They shouldn't be trying to getting into trouble anyway!

Jiro · 07-31-2008, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wokamuka

Why should the majority be weighed down by a bunch of crippled or defective people, anyway? They shouldn't be trying to getting into trouble anyway!

same for responsive legal gun owners for protection purpose!

jillio · 07-31-2008, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wokamuka

Why should the majority be weighed down by a bunch of crippled or defective people, anyway? They shouldn't be trying to getting into trouble anyway!

I love sarcasm!

Liebling:-))) · 07-31-2008, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VamPyroX

I guess the cops are getting lazy and think that using the taser is the solution to everything.

Yes but I would like to add to your post is their paraniod problem.

Liebling:-))) · 07-31-2008, 01:39 PM

Is it sense to taser, shot or beat up unarmed pregnant women, senior people, children, teenagers and speed drivers accord videos in other threads because they ignored Police Officer´s order or try to say or ask them something? To me, no but unprofessional for use weapons to abuse unarmed people like that...

Texan Guy · 08-02-2008, 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jiro123

but then... they could die of asthma attack or allergy...

That's true but that's life, unfortunately.

jillio · 08-03-2008, 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Texan Guy

That's true but that's life, unfortunately.

Correction: that's death.

sweetstarz · 08-03-2008, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VamPyroX

I'm not really worried about using tasers instead of guns, but my bigger worry is the fact that more and more police officers are using tasers more often for things that they could have done without using a taser.

That worries me as well. I guess I'm already inclined to be afraid and distrusting of police officers in general, and maybe that affects how I feel, but it does scare me that it seems that "police brutality" seems to be on the rise.

***VamPyroX*** · 08-10-2008, 02:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liebling:-)))

Yes but I would like to add to your post is their paraniod problem.

Think of it this way...

They can waste 5 minutes wrestling with a guy in order to arrest him.

OR

They can just shoot a taser for 30 seconds. That gives them 4 and a half minutes of free time to stop by the local Krispy Kreme for some donuts.

Jiro · 08-10-2008, 03:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VamPyroX

Think of it this way...

They can waste 5 minutes wrestling with a guy in order to arrest him.

OR

They can just shoot a taser for 30 seconds. That gives them 4 and a half minutes of free time to stop by the local Krispy Kreme for some donuts.

jillio · 08-10-2008, 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VamPyroX

Think of it this way...

They can waste 5 minutes wrestling with a guy in order to arrest him.

OR

They can just shoot a taser for 30 seconds. That gives them 4 and a half minutes of free time to stop by the local Krispy Kreme for some donuts.

Wokamuka · 08-14-2008, 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VamPyroX

Think of it this way...

They can waste 5 minutes wrestling with a guy in order to arrest him.

OR

They can just shoot a taser for 30 seconds. That gives them 4 and a half minutes of free time to stop by the local Krispy Kreme for some donuts.

A community helping a member to overcome temporary circumstances is a waste of time? I beg to differ.

We are, first and foremost, a community. When you believe that we are not, then you have no business participating. Just because you don't want the responsibility of a community that had borne you and conditioned you does not mean you can easily forsake your obligation unto them.

jillio · 08-14-2008, 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wokamuka

A community helping a member to overcome temporary circumstances is a waste of time? I beg to differ.

We are, first and foremost, a community. When you believe that we are not, then you have no business participating. Just because you don't want the responsibility of a community that had borne you and conditioned you does not mean you can easily forsake your obligation unto them.

***VamPyroX*** · 08-15-2008, 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wokamuka

A community helping a member to overcome temporary circumstances is a waste of time? I beg to differ.

We are, first and foremost, a community. When you believe that we are not, then you have no business participating. Just because you don't want the responsibility of a community that had borne you and conditioned you does not mean you can easily forsake your obligation unto them.

I wasn't implying that I think they're wasting their time trying to wrestle the guy down.

I was making a hypothetical theory of what might be in the minds of the police officers who prefer to use tasers instead.

Jiro · 08-15-2008, 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wokamuka

A community helping a member to overcome temporary circumstances is a waste of time? I beg to differ.

We are, first and foremost, a community. When you believe that we are not, then you have no business participating. Just because you don't want the responsibility of a community that had borne you and conditioned you does not mean you can easily forsake your obligation unto them.

but... it's the jobs that not many people wants to do it. they're very courageous to do it especially firemen and cops that would cost their lives someday. we should provide them with necessary equipments needed to effectively to subdue the offender quickly and harmlessly (as less as possible)

jillio · 08-15-2008, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jiro123

but... it's the jobs that not many people wants to do it. they're very courageous to do it especially firemen and cops that would cost their lives someday. we should provide them with necessary equipments needed to effectively to subdue the offender quickly and harmlessly (as less as possible)

They have those means available. Obviously, they aren't using them properly.

The vast majority of cops and firemen retire from their jobs; they do not die in the act of doing their job.

Desire to become a law enforcement officer quite often has nothing to do with courage. Or a firefighter, either.

07-29-2008, 05:19 PM	#1 (permalink)
~♥~Pinky~♥~ Registered User Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 4,681	Cops's Gun vs Taser Shock I just thought to make a thread. I want to know about Gun and Taser shock between. It's American's choice to use a gun or taser shock. Gun can cause die. I heard taser shock can cause die too. is that right? You can discuss about Gun and Taser Shock between here. __________________

07-29-2008, 05:22 PM	#2 (permalink)
Bottesini Elf Assassin Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Sneaking up behind you Posts: 5,919 Blog Entries: 3	Less likely to die from a tazer shock. I would hope guns would be the absolute last resort of police officers. __________________ AllDeaf

07-29-2008, 05:50 PM	#3 (permalink)
PowerON Please don't click me! D: Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Would like to live at Fort Davis, TX Posts: 4,789 Blog Entries: 1	It's better to freeze them without harm warm-blood. then it would rocks and safe. __________________ • [Illustrator.Blog-alloon.com] • Don't shoot me! I'm only blogger!

07-29-2008, 09:49 PM	#4 (permalink)
~♥~Pinky~♥~ Registered User Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 4,681	Okay... Tell us about your opinions. Which is the best safe for gun or taser shock for suspects people? __________________

07-30-2008, 12:27 AM	#5 (permalink)
*VamPyroX* bloody phreak from hell Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Hell Posts: 27,867	I'm not really worried about using tasers instead of guns, but my bigger worry is the fact that more and more police officers are using tasers more often for things that they could have done without using a taser. __________________ Check out my city... CLICK HERE! (If you already visited yesterday, visit again today!)

Today
Deafness	Sponsored Links __________________ This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com

07-31-2008, 12:17 AM	#6 (permalink)
Jiro YOU DOMESTIC DISSENT! Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: NJ Posts: 7,566	I highly highly highly support the use of Taser as the frontline defense weapon. The gun is always always the last resort because it is a deadly force and people will die.

07-31-2008, 02:13 AM	#9 (permalink)
Texan Guy Registered User Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Ireland Posts: 1,784	Either.....but remember, taser shock has a very, very limited range. I rather the cops to have the pepperbag guns than taser shock. More range than taser shock, of course. But I'd say, let the cops to have it both. They will need the gun, they'll never know if a suspect is armed or not. __________________

07-31-2008, 11:01 AM	#12 (permalink)
Wokamuka 1.20.09 : end of an error Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: U.S.A. Posts: 1,828	Why should the majority be weighed down by a bunch of crippled or defective people, anyway? They shouldn't be trying to getting into trouble anyway! __________________

07-31-2008, 01:39 PM	#16 (permalink)
Liebling:-))) My 3 darling princesses Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Germany Posts: 27,054	Is it sense to taser, shot or beat up unarmed pregnant women, senior people, children, teenagers and speed drivers accord videos in other threads because they ignored Police Officer´s order or try to say or ask them something? To me, no but unprofessional for use weapons to abuse unarmed people like that... __________________