Iraq: Stay or Leave? - Page 9

jillio · 07-31-2008, 12:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babyface

victory over a country means complete and total annilation of opposing country, till nothing is left there, that is a supreme victory

Then I don't see it happening in this lifetime!

Jiro · 07-31-2008, 12:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ~♥~Pinky~♥~

You're welcome! I am hope they can reduce the terrorism. You can see at Global Terrorism map where is terrorism and suspect activities. After terrorism died. USA Troops will return home. I believe USA will win.

The global terrorism map you see.... 99.9% of it has nothing to do with USA and has not attacked USA. For the past several years - we have been attacked by foreign terrorists only twice (both at WTC) which is nothing compared to our domestic terrorism.

Most of terrorisms in USA are domestic are done by white people like Tim McVeigh, Eric Rudolph, Ted Kacynski, and... the high schoolers.

Babyface · 07-31-2008, 12:58 AM

we shouldnt help them we helped osamas group against the russians and they turned on us heck just about every country america helps turns on america, or is negative towards america, america shouldnt be helping other countries, america needs to help americans instead of helping starving africans it should be helping starving people in detroit and likend cities

Babyface · 07-31-2008, 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jillio

Then I don't see it happening in this lifetime!

hehe

jillio · 07-31-2008, 01:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ~♥~Pinky~♥~

Vietnam have no longer war anymore. Because it's peace country now. South Korea is not real bad. But North Korea is bad right now.

There is no peace in VietNam. In fact, the country is in worse shape for our having been there. It may be history, but it is a humiliating piece of American history, as is our involvement in Korea.

jillio · 07-31-2008, 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jiro123

The global terrorism map you see.... 99.9% of it has nothing to do with USA and has not attacked USA. For the past several years - we have been attacked by foreign terrorists only twice (both at WTC) which is nothing compared to our domestic terrorism.

Most of terrorisms in USA are domestic are done by white people like Tim McVeigh, Eric Rudolph, Ted Kacynski, and... the high schoolers.

Thank you!!! The government has played on the irrational fears of people in an attempt to convince them that we are under constant threat of foreign terrorism so that the Bush administration can justify their decisions.

Jiro · 07-31-2008, 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Texan Guy

We are there to end the Saddam's Terror regime, period. Now, he's dead and rotting in Hell, good. Now, we are sweeping the Al-Qaeda out of Iraq.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ~♥~Pinky~♥~

Yeah and you forget about Osama Bin Laden too

Eliminating both Saddam and bin Laden will not end the war of terrorism. There will be plenty more to replace them - somebody worse and more evil than them...

Babyface · 07-31-2008, 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jiro123

The global terrorism map you see.... 99.9% of it has nothing to do with USA and has not attacked USA. For the past several years - we have been attacked by foreign terrorists only twice (both at WTC) which is nothing compared to our domestic terrorism.

Most of terrorisms in USA are domestic are done by white people like Tim McVeigh, Eric Rudolph, Ted Kacynski, and... the high schoolers.

so your saying white people are terrorist? how about the fact that someone whose black, according to population percentage has a 50 percent more chance of commiting a crime example murder than a white or mexican

Babyface · 07-31-2008, 01:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jiro123

Eliminating both Saddam and bin Laden will not end the war of terrorism. There will be plenty more to replace them - somebody worse and more evil than them...

Meeeeeee as being more evil and worse, my army of bunny slippers will destory you heaaaaaa!

Texan Guy · 07-31-2008, 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jillio

Why? And with Saddam dead, he cannot reign over anything. However, his death will not end terrorism. It is a religious, civil war we have become involved in. We have no business being there. The purpose of the military is to protect the U.S., not to shove democracy down the throats of others, or to participate in religious conflict.

Yes, he's obviously dead. Who said his death will not end the terrorism??? Well, right now, we basically sweeping the Al-Qaeda out of the troubled country. The good guys are trying to clean up but the bad guys love to messing around up in Iraq's backyard.

jillio · 07-31-2008, 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babyface

so your saying white people are terrorist? how about the fact that someone whose black, according to population percentage has a 50 percent more chance of commiting a crime example murder than a white or mexican

Where did you get those stats?

Babyface · 07-31-2008, 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jillio

Where did you get those stats?

go to yahoo, google, fbi statistics, national cencus statistics anything and it says pretty much the same thing (the more you know!)

~♥~Pinky~♥~ · 07-31-2008, 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babyface

so your saying white people are terrorist? how about the fact that someone whose black, according to population percentage has a 50 percent more chance of commiting a crime example murder than a white or mexican

yeah! They are from here in USA. They know how to build the bomb! That's why I am against Terrorism of Al Qaeda's making of BOMB to threat on our America!

Texan Guy · 07-31-2008, 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jiro123

Eliminating both Saddam and bin Laden will not end the war of terrorism. There will be plenty more to replace them - somebody worse and more evil than them...

Yeah, perhaps, Hu Jintao or Kim Jong-il or even Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

jillio · 07-31-2008, 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babyface

go to yahoo, google, fbi statistics, national cencus statistics anything and it says pretty much the same thing (the more you know!)

Will do.

Jiro · 07-31-2008, 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babyface

so your saying white people are terrorist? how about the fact that someone whose black, according to population percentage has a 50 percent more chance of commiting a crime example murder than a white or mexican

that's called crime... not terrorism. Look at the history of terrorism in USA... mostly done by white people... just correcting your perspective view on terrorism in USA - it's not the "towel head" or a Middle Eastern with big beard.

The crime statistic about races is irrelevant in the subject of terrorism.

Babyface · 07-31-2008, 01:07 AM

dang jill you and pinky are always at each others throat you two should make a movie like the other me or something hahaha two people who never agree hahahaha

Jiro · 07-31-2008, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Texan Guy

Yeah, perhaps, Hu Jintao or Kim Jong-il or even Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

yes yes perhaps.... but hardly a concern since they have not attacked USA once. They hardly pose a threat to USA at all! Yes they are evil and twisted but they are not that crazy to even attack or finance an attack on USA. They know they'll face a wrath from USA which is.... a total annihilation.

Babyface · 07-31-2008, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jiro123

that's called crime... not terrorism. Look at the history of terrorism in USA... mostly done by white people... just correcting your perspective view on terrorism in USA - it's not the "towel head" or a Middle Eastern with big beard.

The crime statistic about races is irrelevant in the subject of terrorism.

not irrelevant, its the same more people have been killed by crime than any terrorist attack only difference is how the media calls the name and thats all im going to say on that because i dont want it to turn into no race battle

~♥~Pinky~♥~ · 07-31-2008, 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babyface

dang jill you and pinky are always at each others throat you two should make a movie like the other me or something hahaha two people who never agree hahahaha

if they are not agree with me. That's their problems.

jillio · 07-31-2008, 01:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babyface

go to yahoo, google, fbi statistics, national cencus statistics anything and it says pretty much the same thing (the more you know!)

Here you go. FBI Crime Stats for 2007.

So far, so good. The preliminary Crime in the United States statistics for 2007 show that the number of violent crimes and property crimes nationwide both fell during the year.

Violent crime dropped 1.4 percent overall compared to 2006, reversing a two-year up tick. That includes decreases in all four offense categories—forcible rape (down 4.3 percent), murder/non-negligent manslaughter (down 2.7 percent), and robbery and aggravated assault (each down 1.2 percent).

Property crime declined 2.1 percent from 2006, with decreases in each city grouping. Arson—tracked separately from other property crimes—also fell 7.0 percent from 2006.

Among the other statistical highlights:

Murder: The numbers ranged from a nearly 10 percent drop in cities with a million people or more (the largest decline in any violent crime category)…to a 3.7 percent rise in cities with 50,000 to 99,999 residents.
Regionally speaking: The rates of violent crime and property crime fell in three out of four regions nationwide. The Northeast, Midwest, and West experienced decreases in both categories, while the South saw slight increases in violent crime (0.7 percent) and property crime (1.1 percent), driven by a 2.9 percent rise in murder and a 3.6 percent rise in robbery. The Northeast had the largest drop in violent crime (5.4 percent), including a decrease of 8.6 percent in murders and non-negligent manslaughter.
Big cities: Cities with a million or more residents saw significant decreases in every violent crime category—9.8 percent in murder; 8.0 percent in rape; 2.9 percent in robbery, and 4.0 percent in aggravated assault.
On the rise: Despite the nationwide drop of 1.4 percent, violent crime actually increased 1.8 percent in non-metropolitan counties and 1.9 percent in cities with populations ranging from 10,000 to 24,999.
Forcible Rape: It was the only violent crime category experiencing declines across the board—in all city groups, in both metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties, and in every region.

I don't see anything that supports your claim that a black individual is 50% more likely to commit a violent crime.

Babyface · 07-31-2008, 01:11 AM

imma make a motion for jill and pinky to have there own threads hahaha itll be fun watching those two outsign each other heheh,.....lord I apologize (sneak peeks)

to jill and pinky good mates and good times

jillio · 07-31-2008, 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Texan Guy

Yes, he's obviously dead. Who said his death will not end the terrorism??? Well, right now, we basically sweeping the Al-Qaeda out of the troubled country. The good guys are trying to clean up but the bad guys love to messing around up in Iraq's backyard.

Has terrorism stopped with his death?

~♥~Pinky~♥~ · 07-31-2008, 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jiro123

Eliminating both Saddam and bin Laden will not end the war of terrorism. There will be plenty more to replace them - somebody worse and more evil than them...

It doesn't matter which is most of evil. Just an EVIL numbers. It's no judge which is the best or least. Still they are evil! They hate our America!

~♥~Pinky~♥~ · 07-31-2008, 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jillio

Has terrorism stopped with his death?

No! It's not still finish yet. We need to find more suspects.

Babyface · 07-31-2008, 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jillio

Here you go. FBI Crime Stats for 2007.

So far, so good. The preliminary Crime in the United States statistics for 2007 show that the number of violent crimes and property crimes nationwide both fell during the year.

Violent crime dropped 1.4 percent overall compared to 2006, reversing a two-year up tick. That includes decreases in all four offense categories—forcible rape (down 4.3 percent), murder/non-negligent manslaughter (down 2.7 percent), and robbery and aggravated assault (each down 1.2 percent).

Property crime declined 2.1 percent from 2006, with decreases in each city grouping. Arson—tracked separately from other property crimes—also fell 7.0 percent from 2006.

Among the other statistical highlights:

Murder: The numbers ranged from a nearly 10 percent drop in cities with a million people or more (the largest decline in any violent crime category)…to a 3.7 percent rise in cities with 50,000 to 99,999 residents.
Regionally speaking: The rates of violent crime and property crime fell in three out of four regions nationwide. The Northeast, Midwest, and West experienced decreases in both categories, while the South saw slight increases in violent crime (0.7 percent) and property crime (1.1 percent), driven by a 2.9 percent rise in murder and a 3.6 percent rise in robbery. The Northeast had the largest drop in violent crime (5.4 percent), including a decrease of 8.6 percent in murders and non-negligent manslaughter.
Big cities: Cities with a million or more residents saw significant decreases in every violent crime category—9.8 percent in murder; 8.0 percent in rape; 2.9 percent in robbery, and 4.0 percent in aggravated assault.
On the rise: Despite the nationwide drop of 1.4 percent, violent crime actually increased 1.8 percent in non-metropolitan counties and 1.9 percent in cities with populations ranging from 10,000 to 24,999.
Forcible Rape: It was the only violent crime category experiencing declines across the board—in all city groups, in both metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties, and in every region.

I don't see anything that supports your claim that a black individual is 50% more likely to commit a violent crime.

Blacks Commit 90 Percent of Interracial Crime

View Poll Results: Should we stay or should we go?
As long it takes, we stay	22	32.35%
Get hell out of Iraq	46	67.65%
Voters: 68. You may not vote on this poll

07-31-2008, 12:58 AM	#243 (permalink)
Babyface Psychotic Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Mesquite, TX Posts: 311	we shouldnt help them we helped osamas group against the russians and they turned on us heck just about every country america helps turns on america, or is negative towards america, america shouldnt be helping other countries, america needs to help americans instead of helping starving africans it should be helping starving people in detroit and likend cities __________________ whatcha thinking about? how I could kill you and get away with it (forgot where I heard that)

07-31-2008, 01:07 AM	#257 (permalink)
Babyface Psychotic Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Mesquite, TX Posts: 311	dang jill you and pinky are always at each others throat you two should make a movie like the other me or something hahaha two people who never agree hahahaha __________________ whatcha thinking about? how I could kill you and get away with it (forgot where I heard that)

07-31-2008, 01:11 AM	#262 (permalink)
Babyface Psychotic Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Mesquite, TX Posts: 311	imma make a motion for jill and pinky to have there own threads hahaha itll be fun watching those two outsign each other heheh,.....lord I apologize (sneak peeks) to jill and pinky good mates and good times __________________ whatcha thinking about? how I could kill you and get away with it (forgot where I heard that)

Today
Deafness	Sponsored Links __________________ This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com