What if there is NO WAR?

PowerON · 06-13-2007, 12:04 PM

What's your thought that NO WAR will lead?

To me, I could think this issues would cause:

- Great overcrowd population
- more pollution
- too much mate to choice, haha.

That's why there is war that necessary to be part of social to make more balance on life and everything else.

06-13-2007, 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PowerON

What's your thought that NO WAR will lead?

To me, I could think this issues would cause:

- Great overcrowd population
- more pollution
- too much mate to choice, haha.

That's why there is war that necessary to be part of social to make more balance on life and everything else.

China is worse than USA for overcrowd. FOOL!

Phillips · 06-13-2007, 12:18 PM

To me....

PEACE WORLD!!!!!!!!

Or

PowerON · 06-13-2007, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phillips

Of course, no war, no experience for people to have defense and give great advantage for alien to take over our world.

PowerON · 06-13-2007, 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neo

China is worse than USA for overcrowd. FOOL!

China can give good example such as...

- limited one child per family. That's seem sad, huh? Vary couple want more children, more merry.
- Most parents want son instead daughter, so he can take care of his parents when they're old fart.

What else do I miss?

nozobo · 06-13-2007, 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neo

China is worse than USA for overcrowd. FOOL!

Right but USA is catching up slowly... Maybe in 100 or 200 years, people will trillions and trillions of stop signs from coast to coast PER MILE

dreama · 06-13-2007, 03:51 PM

I am totally against war!!!

I think it very uneathnical to use war as a form of population control. I think that after having 3 children women should atomatically get spayed. Druggies and criminals should get spayed/neutered automatically.

sequoias · 06-13-2007, 04:01 PM

I never heard of that term spay/neutured on humans. That's common on dog and cats.

dreama · 06-13-2007, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sequoias

I never heard of that term spay/neutured on humans. That's common on dog and cats.

I meant hysterectomy. I just use the word spay as it's less of a mouthfull and we are animals too.

sequoias · 06-13-2007, 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dreama

I meant hysterectomy. I just use the word spay as it's less of a mouthfull and we are animals too.

True enough, yeah we're animals. Even tho, we're called humans in the animal kingdom.

Maria · 06-13-2007, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PowerON

What's your thought that NO WAR will lead?

To me, I could think this issues would cause:

- Great overcrowd population
- more pollution
- too much mate to choice, haha.

That's why there is war that necessary to be part of social to make more balance on life and everything else.

So, you mean you agree that it's necessary to have war to cut down the overpopulation ?

PowerON · 06-13-2007, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maria

So, you mean you agree that it's necessary to have war to cut down the overpopulation ?

war just happen, and it's good. Just like the evil guy from Fifth Element the movie explain it. If you remember.

Destroy thing, it help rebuild and turn better economy.

Maria · 06-13-2007, 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PowerON

war just happen, and it's good. Just like the evil guy from Fifth Element the movie explain it. If you remember.

Destroy thing, it help rebuild and turn better economy.

Nah.. the way I see it, nothin' is goin' to be better. Know why ? Because, the history will repeat itself. There was always a war SINCE Adam and Eve were evicted from the Garden of Eden. There was NEVER a peace and there's ALWAYS a war. Nothin' is goin' to be better on whether if, it is necessary to cut down the overpopulation or not. There are always problems.

Why it is necessary to create more problems when it is necessary to have war to cut down overpopluaton ?

And, you can't contradict 2 different things to conflict rational reason by havin' children or cuttin' down the overpopluation.

PuyoPiyo · 06-13-2007, 07:23 PM

Aww that would be very PEACE world. I wish something like that will happen someday..

And NO it does not cause any problem if we stop war. Also there is alot of ways to control the population than just a war, like reduce the prices of cigarettes and reduce the legal age of smokers, or limit how many people can have kids, or raise the unhealthy foods, or charge more expensive when people reproduce another baby, or blah blah blah...

webexplorer · 06-13-2007, 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dreama

I am totally against war!!!

I think it very uneathnical to use war as a form of population control. I think that after having 3 children women should atomatically get spayed. Druggies and criminals should get spayed/neutered automatically.

Good idea!

webexplorer · 06-13-2007, 09:31 PM

We should be freed as taking our clothes off, floating walk around, and feel enjoyable.

No more peepers, and greatly reduce laws.

Sigh! I think that out-space aliens are our next problem!

PowerON · 06-13-2007, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PuyoPiyo

Aww that would be very PEACE world. I wish something like that will happen someday..

And NO it does not cause any problem if we stop war. Also there is alot of ways to control the population than just a war, like reduce the prices of cigarettes and reduce the legal age of smokers, or limit how many people can have kids, or raise the unhealthy foods, or charge more expensive when people reproduce another baby, or blah blah blah...

what if someone disagree with this strict control? Or course, it would cause war!

PuyoPiyo · 06-13-2007, 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PowerON

what if someone disagree with this strict control? Or course, it would cause war!

Cause the war? Nah... It's just depends on the citizens voting.

Silentwolfdog · 06-13-2007, 11:48 PM

I think it very uneathnical to use war as a form of population control. I think that after having 3 children women should atomatically get spayed. Druggies and criminals should get spayed/neutered automatically.

Nah, it should be males who get it. It's less painful and less dangerous on males than on women. ^^

Males don't have much of self-control so they should be one who get it. Ha!

darkdog · 07-04-2007, 11:37 PM

Interesting thread. I'm sure there is a point of saturation above which mankind cannot maintain its population. However, we don't seem to know what that is. Scientists have been predicting for hundreds of years that overpopulation was imminent. Yet, humans have done quite well while the population has been booming. So I doubt war is necessary to prevent overpopulation. I'd imagine that if overpopulation got really bad, it would cause wars which would control it, but I doubt that'll happen any time soon.

webexplorer · 07-05-2007, 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silentwolfdog

I think it very uneathnical to use war as a form of population control. I think that after having 3 children women should atomatically get spayed. Druggies and criminals should get spayed/neutered automatically.

Nah, it should be males who get it. It's less painful and less dangerous on males than on women. ^^

Males don't have much of self-control so they should be one who get it. Ha!

I agreed.

Texan Guy · 07-05-2007, 12:13 AM

No war? Then, we will have the overcrowd. There won't be peace world. We all have to defend ourself or to attack other for good. Just like World War 2. Hitler wanted to execute the Jews, mental retarded, or any disabilities including deaf. Don't ask me why he wants to execute deaf people. Hitler was insane for some reasons. Japan? Probably wants to control the world or religious. Anyway, after the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, the USA joined the war to fight against Japan for good. There won't be no war. Evil are among us. Gotta to fight.

Aleser · 07-05-2007, 03:02 AM

I pray for a world without fighting. One day, Insha'Allah. I -completely- disagree with limiting how many children a person can have. If they can support the child, it's their choice.

Population control? Nature has it's fury. One way or another, the world CAN be limited without resorting to barbaric measures like wars. Eventually some virus or infection or genetic disorder will surface and the "order of things" will kick in, no human involvement needed.

christlovedeaf · 07-05-2007, 09:34 AM

Well, as I see, war is for power. There are fighting for many reason, religion, power, and even trying to take over countries. Even war due of opposing the leaders who controls.

Sheila · 07-05-2007, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dreama

I am totally against war!!!

I think it very uneathnical to use war as a form of population control. I think that after having 3 children women should atomatically get spayed. Druggies and criminals should get spayed/neutered automatically.

What does castration have to do with drug use? Some crimes can be related to the sex organs, yes, but as far as someone taking a drug and staying at home and watching a movie, I think castration is waaaay out in left field. Even the crack-head wandering around in the streets doesn't deserve castration. That's some 1984-Extreme-Government shit there.

As far as war, it's pretty obvious that mankind is unable to let others live how they want to, resolve conflict with talking, be tolerant of others' religions and not kill in the name of their god, and NOT bomb the crap out of innocent civilians. So, yes, war is necessary, but only when it is the LAST option.

dreama · 07-05-2007, 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sheila

What does castration have to do with drug use? Some crimes can be related to the sex organs, yes, but as far as someone taking a drug and staying at home and watching a movie, I think castration is waaaay out in left field. Even the crack-head wandering around in the streets doesn't deserve castration. That's some 1984-Extreme-Government shit there.

Well I've met druggies who mistreat their kids. I see a greater wrong in an alco parent stabbing their kid with their lit cigarettes and/or regularly knocking them about then simply having that person done and the kids taken away. That would be much kinder for these poor kids.

Sheila · 07-05-2007, 07:23 PM

Quote:

06-13-2007, 12:04 PM	#1 (permalink)
PowerON Please don't click me! D: Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Would like to live at Fort Davis, TX Posts: 4,789 Blog Entries: 1	What if there is NO WAR? What's your thought that NO WAR will lead? To me, I could think this issues would cause: - Great overcrowd population - more pollution - too much mate to choice, haha. That's why there is war that necessary to be part of social to make more balance on life and everything else. __________________ • [Illustrator.Blog-alloon.com] • Don't shoot me! I'm only blogger!

06-13-2007, 12:18 PM	#3 (permalink)
Phillips Lets ride horses! Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Spaceship Posts: 7,195 Blog Entries: 3	To me.... PEACE WORLD!!!!!!!! Or __________________ *Enjoy life today, Yesterday has past and Tomorrow may never come.*

06-13-2007, 03:51 PM	#7 (permalink)
dreama deafblind vegan Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: England Posts: 1,093	I am totally against war!!! I think it very uneathnical to use war as a form of population control. I think that after having 3 children women should atomatically get spayed. Druggies and criminals should get spayed/neutered automatically. __________________ I speak for those who cannot speak for themselves. http://www.fightfoca.com/

06-13-2007, 04:01 PM	#8 (permalink)
sequoias Subaru rules! Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: The Evergreen State Posts: 12,859	I never heard of that term spay/neutured on humans. That's common on dog and cats. __________________

06-13-2007, 07:23 PM	#14 (permalink)
PuyoPiyo My Property!! >:( Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Fourth Plain Village WA Posts: 5,182	Aww that would be very PEACE world. I wish something like that will happen someday.. And NO it does not cause any problem if we stop war. Also there is alot of ways to control the population than just a war, like reduce the prices of cigarettes and reduce the legal age of smokers, or limit how many people can have kids, or raise the unhealthy foods, or charge more expensive when people reproduce another baby, or blah blah blah... __________________ Note: Not credit by myself.

Today
Deafness	Sponsored Links __________________ This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com

06-13-2007, 09:31 PM	#16 (permalink)
webexplorer I'm listening to everyone Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: New England Posts: 3,474	We should be freed as taking our clothes off, floating walk around, and feel enjoyable. No more peepers, and greatly reduce laws. Sigh! I think that out-space aliens are our next problem!

06-13-2007, 11:48 PM	#19 (permalink)
Silentwolfdog a toku fangirl Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Earth Posts: 705	I think it very uneathnical to use war as a form of population control. I think that after having 3 children women should atomatically get spayed. Druggies and criminals should get spayed/neutered automatically. Nah, it should be males who get it. It's less painful and less dangerous on males than on women. ^^ Males don't have much of self-control so they should be one who get it. Ha! __________________ If you are using red or blue font, there's a good chance that I am not reading your posts due to it being blended into background! I have loved the stars too fondly to be fearful of the night. ~Sarah William Check my art at http://silentwolfdog.deviantart.com

07-04-2007, 11:37 PM	#20 (permalink)
darkdog aka dorkdog Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Dallas, TX Posts: 150	Interesting thread. I'm sure there is a point of saturation above which mankind cannot maintain its population. However, we don't seem to know what that is. Scientists have been predicting for hundreds of years that overpopulation was imminent. Yet, humans have done quite well while the population has been booming. So I doubt war is necessary to prevent overpopulation. I'd imagine that if overpopulation got really bad, it would cause wars which would control it, but I doubt that'll happen any time soon. Last edited by darkdog; 07-04-2007 at 11:41 PM. Reason: oops, left out a sentence.

07-05-2007, 12:13 AM	#22 (permalink)
Texan Guy Registered User Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Ireland Posts: 1,784	No war? Then, we will have the overcrowd. There won't be peace world. We all have to defend ourself or to attack other for good. Just like World War 2. Hitler wanted to execute the Jews, mental retarded, or any disabilities including deaf. Don't ask me why he wants to execute deaf people. Hitler was insane for some reasons. Japan? Probably wants to control the world or religious. Anyway, after the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, the USA joined the war to fight against Japan for good. There won't be no war. Evil are among us. Gotta to fight. __________________

07-05-2007, 03:02 AM	#23 (permalink)
Aleser Woosh. Yes, Woosh. Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 571	I pray for a world without fighting. One day, Insha'Allah. I -completely- disagree with limiting how many children a person can have. If they can support the child, it's their choice. Population control? Nature has it's fury. One way or another, the world CAN be limited without resorting to barbaric measures like wars. Eventually some virus or infection or genetic disorder will surface and the "order of things" will kick in, no human involvement needed. __________________ "She thinks... she can make people do what she wants or needs, what is right, by the sheer force of her own talent, not by forcing them... she can teach them and persuade them... that they'll catch it from her. This is still faith in their rationality, in the omnipotence of reason. The mistake? Reason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it. Do not count on them."

07-05-2007, 09:34 AM	#24 (permalink)
christlovedeaf Pices Guy Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: toledo,ohio Posts: 1,868	Well, as I see, war is for power. There are fighting for many reason, religion, power, and even trying to take over countries. Even war due of opposing the leaders who controls. __________________ I can only imagine http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IV9jiqS-74g