Wife School

It's supposed to be a joke. It sounds like it's being shown to a large group of guys laughing loudly.
 
Heath said:
Every woman should attend wife school. Only then should men propose.

whoa whoa! so you're saying that a woman shouldn't get married until she goes to "wife school"?????

that is total... bullcrap! wife school- for what?? so women can learn how to be domestic and subservient???

if that's the case, then men need to attend "husband school"

(I haven't viewed the movie- I'm on sidekick and I don't want to see the movie either)
 
I viewed the video and it was pretty funny - it was meant as humor, not to be taken seriously.

Smiles!
 
DreamDeaf said:
I viewed the video and it was pretty funny - it was meant as humor, not to be taken seriously.

Smiles!
True but it seems that Heath is the one who is taking it seriously :whistle:
 
DreamDeaf said:
I viewed the video and it was pretty funny - it was meant as humor, not to be taken seriously.

Smiles!


Originally Posted by Butterflygirl
True but it seems that Heath is the one who is taking it seriously :whistle:

:D true, I can see that Health took it seriously... It look like that it´s his dream wish... :D
 
ButterflyGirl said:
True but it seems that Heath is the one who is taking it seriously :whistle:

Erm, yeah. I know it was meant to be humorous. However, I think it should be noted that one should take note of the audience before posting something this inflammatory, and this IS inflammatory.

Alot of women will view this as sexist and offensive; regardless of whether it was meant as a joke or not.

I know I did.
 
There is NO way that anyone is going to control me, I know some people think it's a joke but it isn't for me... I would suggest that you dream on about your future wife. Good luck finding one if thats what your looking for, I wouldn't be suprise if she dumped you after less than 6 month marriage. Shucks!!

I thought that you were suppose to be the man not control a woman! :pissed:


This isn't EVER going to happen to me and I'll be sure of that..

I don't got MAID written on my forhead!!!! HELL NO :nono:


Im not mad but this is the way I feel about that video and it's not cool how a woman do everything for a man.... I know it's meant to be a joke but when I saw that Im thinking LAZY BUMS~ meaning the mens. Apparently some of them are like that in real life. But thats sad and Im not going to END UP like one of these womans... I got goals in my life that Im planning on doing instead of having BITCH written on my forhead also! :mad:

I would perfer a good man who will love me for who I am as the same it goes for him. It's love and trust! You don't make your wife a maid just because she is your wife, How would you feel if YOUR WIFE did that to you? You would be thinking your marriage sucks ass big time and in tears :confused: ... thats not how it works, Both partners give love trust respect and on and on!! Thats what I believe in....
 
God made the woman to be the helper to the man. I never said anything about controlling a woman or anything like that. I think you need to read this article which will open your eyes.

Feminist Says Child Rearing not Worthy of Time and Talents of Intelligent Humans

By Hilary White

NEW YORK, June 20, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Linda Hirshman, a feminist US writer on cultural issues, has told the world why she thinks staying at home with the children is an occupation “not worthy of the full time and talents of intelligent and educated human beings.” She complains at length that the feminist movement, while making some gains in public life through legal activism, has largely failed in the one area where it counts most: the family.

She upbraids women who stay at home for failing the feminist agenda, saying, “They do not require a great intellect, they are not honored and they do not involve risks and the rewards that risk brings.”

Writing in the November 2005 edition of the American Prospect, Hirshman admitted that the real intention of the feminist movement was not “equality”, but to destroy what she calls “the unreconstructed family” of a husband and wife rearing children. She writes that the goal was to see as many women as possible abandoning family life for high-level professions and politics.

Hirshman, a committed radical, was a member in the 1970s of the feminist lobby, the National Organization for Women (NOW), a donor to the pro-abortion political organization, EMILY’s List, and a professor of women’s studies.

But, she complains, the movement has “stalled”; while the “public world has changed…private lives have hardly budged.” Childrearing is still seen by both men and women to be the natural purview of women. She writes of her “shock” to discover that among those professional women whom she called the “logical heirs of feminism”, large numbers were leaving their careers to opt for childrearing.

“Marriage is essentially unchanged,” she laments. “The real glass ceiling is at home…Looking back, it seems obvious that the unreconstructed family was destined to re-emerge after the passage of feminism’s storm of social change.”

She writes, “this represents not a loss of present value but a loss of hope for the future -- a loss of hope that the role of women in society will continue to increase.”

Some of the women she interviewed confirmed her worst fears: they liked being mothers. One declined to be interviewed because she could not leave her activities with her daughters: “We’re all in here making fresh apple pie,” she said.

Another, an “an Ivy Leaguer with a master’s degree” described her at-home activities: “I take my [3-year-old] daughter to all the major museums. We go to little movement classes.”

The article ignited a blaze of online outrage from feminists and traditionalists alike. Bloggers and editorials in print and online editions of a number of magazines have run comments blasting Hirshman.

In an op-ed at the online edition of the political magazine, the Huffington Post, Ann Coulter wrote that Hirshman and those who think like her, are “expressing an intolerant world view that women who don't work are losers.”

“Hirshman isn't just expressing an opinion about what she thinks is best, she is saying that any woman who makes a choice different from what she espouses is unequivocally ‘wrong.’”

Coulter writes that feminism is losing its sway in public because it focuses on “problems that hardly exist…while spending precious little energy on issues that indisputably have a negative impact on women: pornography, sex trafficking.”

“If [feminists] spent a fraction of the time on these issues that they spend trying to get women to get their men to vacuum the living room, the world would be a better place.”

http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/jun/06062007.html
 
Heath said:
God made the woman to be the helper to the man. I never said anything about controlling a woman or anything like that. I think you need to read this article which will open your eyes.

Feminist Says Child Rearing not Worthy of Time and Talents of Intelligent Humans

By Hilary White

NEW YORK, June 20, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Linda Hirshman, a feminist US writer on cultural issues, has told the world why she thinks staying at home with the children is an occupation “not worthy of the full time and talents of intelligent and educated human beings.” She complains at length that the feminist movement, while making some gains in public life through legal activism, has largely failed in the one area where it counts most: the family.

She upbraids women who stay at home for failing the feminist agenda, saying, “They do not require a great intellect, they are not honored and they do not involve risks and the rewards that risk brings.”

Writing in the November 2005 edition of the American Prospect, Hirshman admitted that the real intention of the feminist movement was not “equality”, but to destroy what she calls “the unreconstructed family” of a husband and wife rearing children. She writes that the goal was to see as many women as possible abandoning family life for high-level professions and politics.

Hirshman, a committed radical, was a member in the 1970s of the feminist lobby, the National Organization for Women (NOW), a donor to the pro-abortion political organization, EMILY’s List, and a professor of women’s studies.

But, she complains, the movement has “stalled”; while the “public world has changed…private lives have hardly budged.” Childrearing is still seen by both men and women to be the natural purview of women. She writes of her “shock” to discover that among those professional women whom she called the “logical heirs of feminism”, large numbers were leaving their careers to opt for childrearing.

“Marriage is essentially unchanged,” she laments. “The real glass ceiling is at home…Looking back, it seems obvious that the unreconstructed family was destined to re-emerge after the passage of feminism’s storm of social change.”

She writes, “this represents not a loss of present value but a loss of hope for the future -- a loss of hope that the role of women in society will continue to increase.”

Some of the women she interviewed confirmed her worst fears: they liked being mothers. One declined to be interviewed because she could not leave her activities with her daughters: “We’re all in here making fresh apple pie,” she said.

Another, an “an Ivy Leaguer with a master’s degree” described her at-home activities: “I take my [3-year-old] daughter to all the major museums. We go to little movement classes.”

The article ignited a blaze of online outrage from feminists and traditionalists alike. Bloggers and editorials in print and online editions of a number of magazines have run comments blasting Hirshman.

In an op-ed at the online edition of the political magazine, the Huffington Post, Ann Coulter wrote that Hirshman and those who think like her, are “expressing an intolerant world view that women who don't work are losers.”

“Hirshman isn't just expressing an opinion about what she thinks is best, she is saying that any woman who makes a choice different from what she espouses is unequivocally ‘wrong.’”

Coulter writes that feminism is losing its sway in public because it focuses on “problems that hardly exist…while spending precious little energy on issues that indisputably have a negative impact on women: pornography, sex trafficking.”

“If [feminists] spent a fraction of the time on these issues that they spend trying to get women to get their men to vacuum the living room, the world would be a better place.”

http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/jun/06062007.html


Well I still don't agree about the video..... Nothing is going to change my mind about that..... Like I said Im not mad just don't like the idea of it.... It was suppose to be a funny video apparently but no need to get mad at me for posting my thoughts about it..... hope we can still chat
 
Back
Top