Anti-matter bomb or Atomic bomb? --PLEASE FORGIVE ME FOR SPELLING AND GRAMMAR ERRORS!-- -Anti-matter bomb is not finish but still in progress. Anti-Matter bomb is like as "The Creation". Anti-Matter is building in Rome underground somewhere I forgot lol. Anti-Matter is use to destory Catholic on Rome for their history story about Catholic killed people who believed in sicence or try to change their believe. One spark of Anti-Matter can power whole Rome for an month. So that means each spark carries a lot of engery more than Atomic Bomb could carry. If Anti-Matter triggered then it will wipe out most part of Rome. It sound like a movie and History channel show called Angle and Demon. Anti-Matter does exist. -Atomic Bomb were created to force Japan to give up and offical ended the World War II. I am sure all of you knew history about WWII. Atomic bomb can wipe out one large city but not bigger enough as Anti-Matter bomb. They also release Rads which can cause cancer and sickness. These people who lived after Atomic bomb had burnt skin and other awful things happened to them. In my thought, Atomic Bomb is worst because of Rads. Even through, Anti-Matter deals massive of damage but does not release a rads. I think lol. If I am mistaken then please comment! Also comment which bomb do you think is worst?