South Dakokta Legislators To Schools: Teach "Astrological" Cause of global warming

deafskeptic

Active Member
Premium Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2006
Messages
14,492
Reaction score
2
I'm like WTF? when I saw this. Source is thinkprogress. I rarely go there but I was surfing a different forum when I came across this link.

I'm not feeling very optimistic about our educational system right now.


Last week, the South Dakota House of Representatives passed a resolution to “urge” public schools to teach astrology. By a 36-30 vote, the legislators passed House Concurrent Resolution 1009, “Calling for balanced teaching of global warming in the public schools of South Dakota.” After repeating long-debunked denier myths and calling carbon dioxide “the gas of life,” the resolution concludes that public schools should teach that “global warming is a scientific theory rather than a proven fact”:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the House of Representatives of the Eighty-fifth Legislature of the State of South Dakota, the Senate concurring therein, that the South Dakota Legislature urges that instruction in the public schools relating to global warming include the following:

(1) That global warming is a scientific theory rather than a proven fact;
(2) That there are a variety of climatological, meteorological, astrological, thermological, cosmological, and ecological dynamics that can effect [sic] world weather phenomena and that the significance and interrelativity of these factors is largely speculative; and
(3) That the debate on global warming has subsumed political and philosophical viewpoints which have complicated and prejudiced the scientific investigation of global warming phenomena; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Legislature urges that all instruction on the theory of global warming be appropriate to the age and academic development of the student and to the prevailing classroom circumstances.

Yesterday, the South Dakota Senate passed by a vote of 18-17 an amended version of the resolution which eliminates most of the anti-science conspiracy theories, but still asserts that the “global warming debate” has “prejudiced the scientific investigation of global climatic change phenomena.” The amended version now “returns to the House for approval.” (HT: Thoughts From Kansas)
 
I'm like WTF? when I saw this. Source is thinkprogress. I rarely go there but I was surfing a different forum when I came across this link.

I'm not feeling very optimistic about our educational system right now.


What would you call it other than a scientific theory??? Many scientists believe GW is man made

Many believe it is cyclical

Many believe the global is actually cooling now..


All three have their stats and facts to support their theory. To teach one of these as fact and dismiss the others does the students no great service. The goal of school is to teach children HOW to think.....not WHAT to think.
 
Back
Top