Since Bush became President in 2000...

MetroGuy03 said:
That is very typical Texan of you. :roll:
Click to expand...
Actually, I can't speak for any other Texan, but truthiness is a very typical darkdog trait. So the truth, as it turns out, is Bush is a Nazi alien. Oops! Was that the wrong guy to elect or what? The important thing though is that we don't believe anything until we verify it on some website on the internet. We've all learned a lot here. A merry Christmas to all and to all a good night!
 
LOL! Oh, that website is hilarious. I've seen so many false websites were created to poke fun at Little Bush. Does anyone else remember that one of the well-known false websites, a false CNN website that displays that Bush arrested for war crimes in Canada? Many people jumped to conclusion quickly, thinking the site was real, but it had turned out to be false.

Unfortunately, many people get wrong ideas when it comes to Texans that advocate for Little Bush. I have met native Texans that are Liberals and Libertarians that don't advocate for Little Bush. I recently was in Dallas last month, and walked down the street and saw a car that have a bumper sticker that displays Support for John Edwards.
 
darkdog said:
Actually, I can't speak for any other Texan, but truthiness is a very typical darkdog trait. So the truth, as it turns out, is Bush is a Nazi alien. Oops! Was that the wrong guy to elect or what? The important thing though is that we don't believe anything until we verify it on some website on the internet. We've all learned a lot here. A merry Christmas to all and to all a good night!
Click to expand...

Hey, darkdog, it is not even christmas yet! And stop flaming with MetroGuy03 please? Just stick with the topic discussion, thank you.
 
darkdog said:
Actually, I can't speak for any other Texan, but truthiness is a very typical darkdog trait. So the truth, as it turns out, is Bush is a Nazi alien. Oops! Was that the wrong guy to elect or what? The important thing though is that we don't believe anything until we verify it on some website on the internet. We've all learned a lot here. A merry Christmas to all and to all a good night!
Click to expand...

Hmmm sure... Christmas? Christmas is not around for another three month. :roll:
 
darkdog said:
Oh yeah, and Clinton wasn't impeached for having an affair. He was impeached for perjury.
Click to expand...

perjury over what?

Adultery is not a high crime or misdemeanor.
Click to expand...

Exactly!

Like what I said before that impeachment because of his lie over his affair with Monica. :roll: His lie do not kill thousand innoncent people but Bush. It make no sense... :roll:





Perjury is.
Click to expand...

Lie over what?



:lol: Barbaro over that "Little Bush" :lol:
Click to expand...
 
As a diplobrat, I don't agree politically the way Clinton handled his political affairs and made poor judgments with conflicts. I'm not going to type everything what he did during the administration for personal and security reasons.

He was impeached for perjury, which would be the Jones Deposition.
 
Liebling:-))) said:
over what?
Click to expand...
OK, for the umpteenth time that you've asked this, I'll answer again. Here is the official Congressional Record:

III. ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT AGAINST PRESIDENT WILLIAM JEFFERSON
CLINTON
[H. Res. 611, 105th Cong., 2d Sess.]

[Exhibited to Senate on January 7, 1999]

RESOLUTION
Impeaching William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States,
for high crimes and misdemeanors.
Resolved, That William Jefferson Clinton, President of the
United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors,
and that the following articles of impeachment be exhibited to
the United States Senate:
Articles of impeachment exhibited by the House of
Representatives of the United States of America in the name of
itself and of the people of the United States of America,
against William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United
States of America, in maintenance and support of its
impeachment against him for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Article I
In his conduct while President of the United States,
William Jefferson Clinton, in violation of his constitutional
oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the
United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve,
protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and
in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the
laws be faithfully executed, has willfully corrupted and
manipulated the judicial process of the United States for his
personal gain and exoneration, impeding the administration of
justice, in that:
On August 17, 1998, William Jefferson Clinton swore to tell
the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth before a
Federal grand jury of the United States. Contrary to that oath,
William Jefferson Clinton willfully provided perjurious, false
and misleading testimony to the grand jury concerning one or
more of the following: (1) the nature and details of his
relationship with a subordinate Government employee; (2) prior
perjurious, false and misleading testimony he gave in a Federal
civil rights action brought against him; (3) prior false and
misleading statements he allowed his attorney to make to a
Federal judge in that civil rights action; and (4) his corrupt
efforts to influence the testimony of witnesses and to impede
the discovery of evidence in that civil rights action.
In doing this, William Jefferson Clinton has undermined the
integrity of his office, has brought disrepute on the
Presidency, has betrayed his trust as President, and has acted
in a manner subversive of the rule of law and justice, to the
manifest injury of the people of the United States.
Wherefore, William Jefferson Clinton, by such conduct,
warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office and
disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust,
or profit under the United States.

Article II
In his conduct while President of the United States,
William Jefferson Clinton, in violation of his constitutional
oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the
United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve,
protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and
in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the
laws be faithfully executed, has prevented, obstructed, and
impeded the administration of justice, and has to that end
engaged personally, and through his subordinates and agents, in
a course of conduct or scheme designed to delay, impede, cover
up, and conceal the existence of evidence and testimony related
to a Federal civil rights action brought against him in a duly
instituted judicial proceeding.
The means used to implement this course of conduct or
scheme included one or more of the following acts:
(1) On or about December 17, 1997, William Jefferson
Clinton corruptly encouraged a witness in a Federal
civil rights action brought against him to execute a
sworn affidavit in that proceeding that he knew to be
perjurious, false and misleading.
(2) On or about December 17, 1997, William Jefferson
Clinton corruptly encouraged a witness in a Federal
civil rights action brought against him to give
perjurious, false and misleading testimony if and when
called to testify personally in that proceeding.
(3) On or about December 28, 1997, William Jefferson
Clinton corruptly engaged in, encouraged, or supported
a scheme to conceal evidence that had been subpoenaed
in a Federal civil rights action brought against him.
(4) Beginning on or about December 7, 1997, and
continuing through and including January 14, 1998,
William Jefferson Clinton intensified and succeeded in
an effort to secure job assistance to a witness in a
Federal civil rights action brought against him in
order to corruptly prevent the truthful testimony of
that witness in that proceeding at a time when the
truthful testimony of that witness would have been
harmful to him.
(5) On January 17, 1998, at his deposition in a
Federal civil rights action brought against him,
William Jefferson Clinton corruptly allowed his
attorney to make false and misleading statements to a
Federal judge characterizing an affidavit, in order to
prevent questioning deemed relevant by the judge. Such
false and misleading statements were subsequently
acknowledged by his attorney in a communication to that
judge.
(6) On or about January 18 and January 20-21, 1998,
William Jefferson Clinton related a false and
misleading account of events relevant to a Federal
civil rights action brought against him to a potential
witness in that proceeding, in order to corruptly
influence the testimony of that witness.
(7) On or about January 21, 23, and 26, 1998, William
Jefferson Clinton made false and misleading statements
to potential witnesses in a Federal grand jury
proceeding in order to corruptly influence the
testimony of those witnesses. The false and misleading
statements made by William Jefferson Clinton were
repeated by the witnesses to the grand jury, causing
the grand jury to receive false and misleading
information.
In all of this, William Jefferson Clinton has undermined
the integrity of his office, has brought disrepute on the
Presidency, has betrayed his trust as President, and has acted
in a manner subversive of the rule of law and justice, to the
manifest injury of the people of the United States.
Wherefore, William Jefferson Clinton, by such conduct,
warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office and
disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust,
or profit under the United States.
Passed the House of Representatives December 19, 1998.
Newt Gingrich,
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Attest: Robin H. Carle,
Clerk.
Click to expand...
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=106_cong_documents&docid=f:sd002.106
 
Liebling, It's republican that made threated to impeach him but not kick out from office yet.
 
Liebling:-))) said:
over what?
Click to expand...
The Jones Deposition.



Reba - Thanks, I was going to search for this official document through the gov. website. It's been a long while since I have read his cases.

The bizarre thing is ironically, Clinton himself signed the law that in sexual harassment cases, the defendant's personal sexual conducts outside of the case is fair game. The law landed him in trouble in the first place. He had opened his own cans of worms. He had violated plenty of laws such as the bombing campaign against Serbia without the consent of Congress.
 
Back
Top