Sickening!!!!

Discussion in 'Sign Language & Deaf Education' started by shel90, Feb 15, 2012.

  1. shel90

    shel90 Audist are not welcome Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Messages:
    44,986
    Likes Received:
    243
    Location:
    A place where crabs are popular
    I am SICK!!!! This is quoted by HEARINDIANA.ORG website, encouraging citizens of Indiana to write to their senators using this letter.... READ ON!!!

    Dear Senator __________,

    I am writing to encourage your SUPPORT for HB 1367.

    {INSERT YOUR PERSONAL STORY. PLEASE INCLUDE YOUR EXPERIENCES WITH ISD/OUTREACH. OUR REPRESENTATIVES NEED TO KNOW WHY ISD/OUTREACH IS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR ALL FAMILIES.}

    IMPORTANT FACTS:

    95% of deaf and hard of hearing babies are born to HEARING parents.
    80-90% of parents choose a Listening and Spoken Language as their communication option.
    Newborn babies can wear hearing aids, and profoundly deaf babies can get a cochlear implant at age one.
    99% of all profoundly deaf children are candidates for a cochlear implant, a device which allows them to listen, speak, and thrive in the hearing community.

    Indiana's status quo concerning deaf and hard of hearing education is NOT working effectively for 80% of all Hoosier families. Of course, 100% of parents deserve to receive unbiased, comprehensive information about communication options, so they can make an informed decision about what is best for their family. HB 1367 will help ALL children who are deaf or hard of hearing, not just some of them. ALL parents deserve to have their communication choice(s) respected. Likewise, a family's use (or non-use) of hearing technology should be respected and supported through appropriate services. Under the current system, Hoosier parents do NOT have equal access to all communication options or information about hearing technology. Outreach services for the entire state should not be associated with one school and ONE philosophy.

    HB 1367 is NOT adding an agency, but rather, it is moving one. Unlike ISD/Outreach, which promotes ASL as the language for thinking, the new Center would be unbiased toward any particular mode of communication. It would serve ALL deaf and hard of hearing families regardless of the communication methods chosen.

    HB 1367 includes tracking and monitoring of children who are deaf and hard of hearing as they are identified and enrolled in appropriate services. These activities will prevent children from falling through the cracks. As a result, the State of Indiana will spend less money in intervention down the road.

    HB 1367 offers the opportunity to align our state with the best practices in early intervention for children who are deaf or hard of hearing. I will be very disappointed if we do not take advantage of this opportunity to make our Indiana system work for all children who need it.

    Every 48 hours a baby in Indiana is born with a hearing loss. We can't wait. We must make this change NOW!

    For our children’s future, please SUPPORT HB 1367.

    Sincerely,
     
  2. shel90

    shel90 Audist are not welcome Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Messages:
    44,986
    Likes Received:
    243
    Location:
    A place where crabs are popular
    This is bullshit...
     
  3. shel90

    shel90 Audist are not welcome Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Messages:
    44,986
    Likes Received:
    243
    Location:
    A place where crabs are popular
    NOW THIS MAKES SENSE and IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO...

    It's time to help Indiana again! The National Association of the Deaf (NAD) asks everyone who can, to attend a rally to support the Indiana School for the Deaf in Indianapolis on Thursday, February 16th. Testimony in the Indiana Senate on State House Bill 1367 will begin at 8 am on February 16th. Deaf people as well as parents of Deaf children and all allies need to help convince the state senators to vote against this misguided bill.

    The NAD also asks that everyone call and/or email Indiana Senators and ask them to oppose Indiana State House Bill 1367. The bill would remove the outreach center currently housed at the Indiana School for the Deaf, terminate all staff working in that center, and recreate a new outreach center separate from the school. HEAR Indiana is the major proponent of this bill. Please find the phone numbers and emails of Indiana Senators in the Indiana Association of the Deaf Action Alert at the bottom of this news release.

    The outreach center already provides comprehensive and impartial information to all deaf and hard of hearing children and their parents in Indiana. There is no need to dismantle this outreach center and begin all over again with a new center. Doing so also is fiscally irresponsible and unnecessary in these difficult economic times.

    The National Association of the Deaf sent a letter to Indiana Senators, and asks all members and supporters to call or send their own emails and letters to these Indiana Senators. More information about the bill, contact information for Indiana Senators, and how to write a letter is provided below.
     
  4. purplewowies

    purplewowies Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2010
    Messages:
    240
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just wanted to say... I am SO against this... :noway: Even if they do want to make changes, why do they need to move the existing facility?

    OMG *gasp* it's on a DEAF SCHOOL campus! I think I'm gonna faint!

    [/sarcasm]

    And as far as I can see, ISD's outreach program isn't all that biased and doesn't necessarily "promote ASL as the language for thinking" above all else. Yes, the school believes that ASL is the most accessible language for communication and thinking (a belief I agree with), but they also consider ASL and English as equal. Just because the school believes ASL is the most accessible, that doesn't mean the outreach program can't represent a continuum of modes/opportunities/services in an unbiased way.

    And what about Hear Indiana's bias? Their mission/vision statement SCREAMS oralism in a way that is much more biased than ISD's mission/vision/bilingualism statements.

    I'm not sure whether it's a good or a bad thing that Senate didn't vote on this on Thursday like they planned to.

    Did I mention I don't particularly like Hear Indiana?
     
  5. TXgolfer

    TXgolfer Dream Weaver Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Messages:
    19,032
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Everywhere
    :dunno: An unbiased approach sounds like a pretty good idea to me.
     
  6. purplewowies

    purplewowies Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2010
    Messages:
    240
    Likes Received:
    0
    Me, too. But from what I've found, the current outreach program isn't biased to begin with, so I don't really understand why the current center needs to be eliminated in the first place. A girl who is a senior at ISD put her testimony/case forward, and a she makes a pretty good case for them being unbiased. IMO, the current outreach isn't broken, so why should we fix it (especially when "fixing it" could require a bit of money)?

    (BTW, I was very angry--not necessarily just at the bill, but for a number of reasons--when I made my other post, so if anyone thinks I was extremely hostile, that wasn't how I meant to come off.)
     
  7. Frisky Feline

    Frisky Feline Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2003
    Messages:
    26,321
    Likes Received:
    72
    Any updated status on it? i missed this one.
     
  8. TXgolfer

    TXgolfer Dream Weaver Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Messages:
    19,032
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Everywhere
    :dunno: I had to really dig through this site to find a mention of CIs. I don't know anything about ISD specifically, but in general, from what I have seen on various websites, it would be rare at best to find an unbiased opinion on a school campus. Seems to me moving the outreach off campus would give parents access to more balanced information.

    Indiana School for the Deaf: Outreach
     
  9. purplewowies

    purplewowies Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2010
    Messages:
    240
    Likes Received:
    0
    As far as I know, the most recent info is that there was supposed to be a vote on it on Thursday, but there was no vote that day. I can't find anything on when the vote might be now, so that's the most recent info.
     
  10. deafdyke

    deafdyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    15,392
    Likes Received:
    81
    Location:
    Trebekistan
    TxGolfer, there's already an unbiased approach. The thing is, what AG Bell does not understand is that Deaf schools are NOT some glorious voice off paradise. Even lots of DODAs get speech training!?!?! HEAR in Indiana, seems to think that EVERY dhh kid has access to good suburban schools without maybe thinking that kids may be stuck in Gary Indiana or other horrible schools. Hell, even a suburban school can be really bad. I know of a case where a 5th grade girl is struggling even thou she's an auditory verbal sucess....I keep encouraging the mother to send her kid to ISD. There are prolly tons and tons and tons of stories like that out there.
    Also, the stats are inaccurate. Yes, many parents chose oral only for their kids.....but many of them are already HOH.
    Plus, a lot of profound kids can benifit from HAs...one of my best friends is profound
     
  11. TXgolfer

    TXgolfer Dream Weaver Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Messages:
    19,032
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Everywhere
    :Hmm: I don't see anything about closing ISD in the letter. And it seems equal access is the goal of the bill.

     
  12. deafdyke

    deafdyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    15,392
    Likes Received:
    81
    Location:
    Trebekistan
    TxGolfer, you don't understand that they already have the choices. Even oral....The fuss is that it's not being presented in an pro "auditory verbal" "dhh kids can be a part of the hearing world and not need ASL and deaf stuff" platform.
     
  13. TXgolfer

    TXgolfer Dream Weaver Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Messages:
    19,032
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Everywhere
    I'm going by the letter and the bill.
     
  14. purplewowies

    purplewowies Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2010
    Messages:
    240
    Likes Received:
    0
    We can't go just off of Hear Indiana's form letter, though, since they as an organization are biased. If we're going to look at Hear Indiana's stuff, we should be looking at IAD's stuff, too. I'm currently looking at IAD's website to see if they have a form letter and to check what parts of said letter contradict/agree with Hear Indiana's letter.

    Here's their letter:

    Some notes on what I thought was contradictory:
    1. Hear Indiana says the current outreach is biased; IAD doesn't. Which is it?
    2. IAD states that the current outreach works with the auditory-oral school in Indy; Hear Indiana states that the current outreach is only associated with one philosophy.
    3. IAD says 90% of children are born to hearing families; Hear Indiana says 95%. These can't both be correct.
    4. Hear Indiana says children won't fall through the cracks; IAD says they will.
    5. Hear Indiana says 80-90% of parents choose listening/spoken language as their communication option, whereas IAD says 80% of deaf children are mainstreamed and that there's no data on how many use ASL or spoken language or both.

    What they agree upon:
    1. The current system could be enhanced/improved.


    Other thoughts:
    I don't understand why this new thing's (apparently) going to be run by the Office of Management and Budget.

    Also, here is the video of the girl I mentioned earlier (I felt the need to post it):

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1Tyk1vohGg]Oppose Indiana HB 1367 - YouTube[/ame]

    I'm not saying she's right or wrong. I tried to investigate some of the claims she made (namely the one about closing ISD/the "stated objective in [Hear Indiana's] newsletters"), but I couldn't find any online archive of Hear Indiana's newletters, only a page on their website where I could sign up to receive new issues.
     
  15. TXgolfer

    TXgolfer Dream Weaver Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Messages:
    19,032
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Everywhere
    :dunno: I stick with what I said earlier. I think moving the outreach off campus gives parents the best chance to receive balanced information. I guess we will see what happens.
     
  16. Speedy Hawk

    Speedy Hawk New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2010
    Messages:
    816
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not understanding what this suppose mean? Hmmm, too many fancy words.
     
  17. deafdyke

    deafdyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    15,392
    Likes Received:
    81
    Location:
    Trebekistan
    Yes, but balanced info how? ISD contacts with St. Joseph's!!!! ISD's outreach offers the WHOLE APPROACH. ISD is the CENTER of Deaf Ed. Most dhh stuff is targeted towards OLD PEOPLE or late deafened people.
     
  18. purplewowies

    purplewowies Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2010
    Messages:
    240
    Likes Received:
    0
    I guess my major problem with this bill is that the major proponent is an oralist organization. I mean, why are IAD and NAD against it so much, and why are Hear Indiana and Cochlear Implant Online so for it? Something seems fishy.

    Also, I found this on American Society for Deaf Children's site, and I think it covers my concern:

    Basically, if everyone had provided input on the creation of the bill, I think there might be much less opposition toward it.

    Really all anyone (supporting or opposing) can do is wait. There will be a committee proceeding on Thursday, but the public is not allowed to comment (though I believe it was said that they can watch it). Then, if it makes it out of committee, the entire Senate would vote on it.
     
  19. TXgolfer

    TXgolfer Dream Weaver Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Messages:
    19,032
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Everywhere
    Yet you really have to dig through the outreach website to find any mention of CI's. That just doesn't seem balanced to me.
     
  20. Foxrac

    Foxrac Well-Known Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    44,335
    Likes Received:
    409
    Well, the new Center will be more biased than usually and their research is really nothing to prove the fact. I oppose HB 1367 as well and I believe that Center should be in deaf school. The unbiased and biased are left to people to make their own thinking about how is bad with Center at deaf school.

    Yup, Hear Indiana is obviously biased and side with AG Bell. They doesn't believe ASL as optional to communicate.

    ASL is only language that I used to communicate after decade of failed speech therapies and CI never make success in my life. The cases are varies by person to person so person shouldn't forced to accept oral language if they can't thorough with speech therapies.

    In Alabama, I doubt about anything will change and ASD (deaf school in Alabama) is homogeneously ASL. I met couple of ASD students at Gally and they are Class of 2011 so none of students wear CI. I believe that most students with CI attend at mainstream school. The education at ASD is much improving and most students graduated with regular HS diploma that equally to hearing school.
     

Share This Page

Looking to buy hearing aids online? Check out Hearex.com