rockin'robin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2007
- Messages
- 24,433
- Reaction score
- 544
LANSING, Mich. — Faith-based adoption agencies will be allowed to refuse to serve prospective parents, such as same-sex or unmarried couples, if doing so would go against their religious beliefs in a package of bills that Michigan's governor signed Thursday.
Gov. Rick Snyder said the legislation codifies existing state practice for private agencies with contracts to place children and ensures as many organizations as possible are involved in helping kids be adopted.
The Republican-controlled state Senate sent the bill Wednesday to Snyder as the U.S. Supreme Court is on the verge of ruling later this month on whether same-sex marriages should be legal nationwide.
The Senate version included a requirement that faith-based adoption agencies provide referrals to other agencies if they refuse service to prospective parents. So the bill went back to the state House where it received a quick concurrence vote, passing 65-44.
Snyder had been coy about whether he would support the bills. Earlier this year he said the adoption bills would need further review and that he's in favor of children being adopted by "loving families" and "loving parents." He didn't specify whether that included same-sex couples.
Michigan. along with Louisiana and Mississippi, already places restrictions on same-sex couples adopting children, according to the Family Equality Council, a Boston-based nonprofit that says it represents 3 million LGBT parents.
On Wednesday, Snyder spokeswoman Sara Wurfel, had said the governor would carefully review the bills "through the lens of what will ensure that we are taking care of the most Michigan children, and matching them with their forever families."
Critics of the bills derided the legislation as state-sanctioned discrimination — especially because many of the faith-based agencies receive state money. But supporters say the new law will help keep all options open for adoptive parents while not forcing the agencies to compromise their principles for fear of legal retaliation or face closure because of a loss of public money.
In the 2014-15 budget year, $19.9 million in state and federal monies went toward supporting agencies for adoption and foster care services, according to the state Department of Human Services. Nearly $10 million of that total went to faith-based agencies that would be covered under the religious objection bills.
"If they close their doors, I don't know what we'll do with all the children," GOP Sen. Rick Jones of Grand Ledge, Mich., said Wednesday after the state Senate vote. "This is a real threat."
GOP Sen. Tom Casperson of Escanaba, Mich., quoted scripture, saying Jesus told a woman accused of adultery, "'Go and sin no more.' He called it out. He didn't just accept it and say, 'Live however you want.' The creator is pretty clear on certain things."
But opponents said the bills just signed legalize discrimination against the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender communities as well as unmarried couples.
"These RFRA (Religious Freedom Restoration Act) adoption bills are the most egregious example of religious conservatism run amok in our government," said Sen. Coleman Young, a Detroit Democrat. "Children are in desperate need of stable and loving homes. And today, we're slashing those opportunities because of archaic, closed-minded thinking."
Other Democrats said the timing of the Senate action is clear.
"Similar laws are being passed to push back against the eventual legalization of same-sex marriage," said Sen. Curtis Hertel Jr., a Democrat from East Lansing, Mich. "You're once again on the wrong side of history."
Democrats had tried to get eight amendments passed that would have, among other things:
• Required faith-based agencies to provide their policies in writing to potential clients, on their websites and in their facilities as well as comply with state and federal civil-rights laws
• Prohibited adoption agencies that receive more than $500,000 in state money from being able to use the religious objection argument.
• And allowed for second parent adoptions for unmarried couples.
All of those amendments failed. Only one Republican, GOP Sen. Tory Rocca of Sterling Heights, Mich., voted against the bills.
Snyder has said he would veto a Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which caused furor recently in Arkansas and in Indiana, without an expansion of Michigan's Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act to include the LGBT community. But he hasn't made the same promise on the adoption bills.
The religious-freedom bill would provide a legal defense for a business subject to state action for refusing services to individuals based on the owner's religious beliefs.
http://www.firstcoastnews.com/story...-unmarried-couple-adoption-michigan/71058222/
Gov. Rick Snyder said the legislation codifies existing state practice for private agencies with contracts to place children and ensures as many organizations as possible are involved in helping kids be adopted.
The Republican-controlled state Senate sent the bill Wednesday to Snyder as the U.S. Supreme Court is on the verge of ruling later this month on whether same-sex marriages should be legal nationwide.
The Senate version included a requirement that faith-based adoption agencies provide referrals to other agencies if they refuse service to prospective parents. So the bill went back to the state House where it received a quick concurrence vote, passing 65-44.
Snyder had been coy about whether he would support the bills. Earlier this year he said the adoption bills would need further review and that he's in favor of children being adopted by "loving families" and "loving parents." He didn't specify whether that included same-sex couples.
Michigan. along with Louisiana and Mississippi, already places restrictions on same-sex couples adopting children, according to the Family Equality Council, a Boston-based nonprofit that says it represents 3 million LGBT parents.
On Wednesday, Snyder spokeswoman Sara Wurfel, had said the governor would carefully review the bills "through the lens of what will ensure that we are taking care of the most Michigan children, and matching them with their forever families."
Critics of the bills derided the legislation as state-sanctioned discrimination — especially because many of the faith-based agencies receive state money. But supporters say the new law will help keep all options open for adoptive parents while not forcing the agencies to compromise their principles for fear of legal retaliation or face closure because of a loss of public money.
In the 2014-15 budget year, $19.9 million in state and federal monies went toward supporting agencies for adoption and foster care services, according to the state Department of Human Services. Nearly $10 million of that total went to faith-based agencies that would be covered under the religious objection bills.
"If they close their doors, I don't know what we'll do with all the children," GOP Sen. Rick Jones of Grand Ledge, Mich., said Wednesday after the state Senate vote. "This is a real threat."
GOP Sen. Tom Casperson of Escanaba, Mich., quoted scripture, saying Jesus told a woman accused of adultery, "'Go and sin no more.' He called it out. He didn't just accept it and say, 'Live however you want.' The creator is pretty clear on certain things."
But opponents said the bills just signed legalize discrimination against the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender communities as well as unmarried couples.
"These RFRA (Religious Freedom Restoration Act) adoption bills are the most egregious example of religious conservatism run amok in our government," said Sen. Coleman Young, a Detroit Democrat. "Children are in desperate need of stable and loving homes. And today, we're slashing those opportunities because of archaic, closed-minded thinking."
Other Democrats said the timing of the Senate action is clear.
"Similar laws are being passed to push back against the eventual legalization of same-sex marriage," said Sen. Curtis Hertel Jr., a Democrat from East Lansing, Mich. "You're once again on the wrong side of history."
Democrats had tried to get eight amendments passed that would have, among other things:
• Required faith-based agencies to provide their policies in writing to potential clients, on their websites and in their facilities as well as comply with state and federal civil-rights laws
• Prohibited adoption agencies that receive more than $500,000 in state money from being able to use the religious objection argument.
• And allowed for second parent adoptions for unmarried couples.
All of those amendments failed. Only one Republican, GOP Sen. Tory Rocca of Sterling Heights, Mich., voted against the bills.
Snyder has said he would veto a Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which caused furor recently in Arkansas and in Indiana, without an expansion of Michigan's Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act to include the LGBT community. But he hasn't made the same promise on the adoption bills.
The religious-freedom bill would provide a legal defense for a business subject to state action for refusing services to individuals based on the owner's religious beliefs.
http://www.firstcoastnews.com/story...-unmarried-couple-adoption-michigan/71058222/
