cdaigle430
Member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2007
- Messages
- 540
- Reaction score
- 0
Okay, I agree she did a bad thing but come on-1.9 million dollar fine? I 've seen alot hyprocrites claim that she got what she deserves but I'm certain that just about everyone has illegal coppied software on their computers wether you realize it or not. All she did was share, she didn't sell or make money from them. The music industry is out of control-if they want to keep consumers buying and not sharing music illegaly they need to bring down the cost. I know, they claim the high cost is to pay for lawyers and security devices and loss from piracy but someone needs to start somewhere. It's getting to the point where we will all be afraid to sneeze for fear of being sued. Yes she did a bad thing but lets be more realistic on the punishment here.
Jury rules against Minn. mom in download case
A replay of the nation's only file-sharing case to go to trial has ended with the same result, finding a Minnesota woman to have violated music copyrights and ordering her to pay.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31432024/from/ET/
Jury rules against Minn. mom in download case
A replay of the nation's only file-sharing case to go to trial has ended with the same result, finding a Minnesota woman to have violated music copyrights and ordering her to pay.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31432024/from/ET/