Are Murderers Born or Made?

rockin'robin

Well-Known Member
What drives people to kill others? The nature vs. nurture argument that dominates so much of modern psychology seems especially significant when examining the psychological origins of violent murderers.




Dr Cesare Lombroso, often called the father of scientific criminology, hypothesized that serious criminal are a step down the evolutionary ladder, closer to apes in their violent tendencies than all other humans. After years of study, he developed a system to recognized murderers by their elongated features.

Unfortunately, it’s not as simple as Lombroso theorized, although his studies were among the first of many in a scientific struggle to understand the men and women who murder.

As the BBC notes, the search was revolutionized by the invention of brain imaging technologies in the 1980s. British neuroscientist Prof. Adrian Raine was the first to study murderers using brain scans. His years of study and myriad scans of murderer’s minds showed common abnormalities among the killers — reduced activity in the pre-frontal cortex, responsible for controlling emotional impulses, and increased activity in the amygdala, which generates our emotions.

So murderers are more prone to rage and anger but less adept at controlling those emotions. The question still remains: are these tendencies the result of genetics or upbringing?

A possible reason, according to Raine’s studies, is childhood abuse, which might create murderers simply by causing damage to the particularly vulnerable pre-frontal cortex.

“Early physical abuse, amongst other things could have led to the brain damage, which could have led to him committing this violent act,” Raine said.

Not all those who were abused during childhood grow up to become murderers, however. A genetic explanation for violent tendencies has yet to be ruled out, and there is in fact some supporting evidence for the idea.

The BBC reports:


Fifteen years of painstaking research revealed that [the murderers studied] all lacked the same gene.


This gene produces an enzyme called MAOA, which regulates the levels of neurotransmitters involved in impulse control. It turns out that if you lack the MAOA gene or have the low-activity variant you are predisposed to violence. This variant became known as the warrior gene.

An estimated 30% of men possess the warrior gene, but its activation depends upon what happens during one’s childhood. Researcher Jim Fallon possesses many of the genes that should make him predisposed to murder. But instead, he’s a professor drawn to studying the subject partially by his family tree, which is surprisingly lousy with murderers. Fallon isn’t a murderer, and he credits his lack of violent tendencies to his stable and happy upbringing.

“If you’ve the high-risk form of the gene and you were abused early on in life,” Fallon said, “your chances of a life of crime are much higher. If you have the high-risk gene but you weren’t abused, then there really wasn’t much risk. So just a gene by itself, the variant doesn’t really dramatically affect behavior, but under certain environmental conditions there is a big difference.”

So modern study suggests that murderers are both born and made, the separate factors of genetics and environment combining to determine the future of a potential killer. Hopefully, the increased understanding of these factors will allow psychologists and criminologists to spot the warning signs and intervene before it’s too late.

http://firsttoknow.com/murderers-born-made/?utm_source=facebookpage
 

femme Fatale

Official AD Nutcracker
Both nature AND nurture. Depends on what factors came together to reflect such behavior. Think sbout it, if it was easily determined, it'd be easy to identify red flags that lead to problem prople.
 

A Nihilist

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Yeah I second femme Fatale, I even see this in drug addicts. You would think that all drug addicts come from broken families but some have had a perfect background and yet still fall apart.
 

caz12

New Member
I saw something about this last night I think but not certain he wanted to use these facts get someone from jail or save someone on death row but I only saw small bit.i agree nature and nurture
 

Reba

Retired Terp
Premium Member
I took an entire semester criminology course that covered this topic (back when I was working on my political science degree). This is nothing new. After all is said and done, there is no one factor that leads a person to become a criminal. It's a combination of factors. There are influences inside and outside the person, of varying degrees.

Also, because there is so much variety in types of crimes, that's another reason why one-cause can't fit all. Even though this latest study is about murderers only, there is still too much variability.

Another problem is that not every murder is violent or the result of some kind of rage. We've all read about the cold and calculating emotionless killers. That kind of negates the killer-gene factor.

This study might be able give insight into a very specific group of killers but it's not an answer to all of them.
 

caz12

New Member
I think he was saying pycopath is brain dysfunction not their fault...I guess all prisnor can ask for mri now
 

Bebonang

Active Member
I am not an expert in criminology but I feel that there is a lack of nurture and lack of love. He or she learned from their family members including being abused. Also a person might have psychological problems which he or she need to be in the mental hospital. Prison or Jail are the only way to control their violence. It is really sad that we have to put up with their violence power over us. They think they are more superior and more power over us. They don't think rationally. They are just sick people. **sigh**
 

Cowpuppy

Member
I think both….environment…..DNA…..lot of times it's passion……spur of the moment lose control…….then regret it rest of life…..we all have that little green monster in us.:eek3:
 
Top