AllDeaf.com
Our Sponsors

Go Back   AllDeaf.com > Deaf Interests > Sign Language & Oralism
  
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-03-2009, 12:05 PM   #31 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by rick48 View Post
What pagedancer is looking for is for information and resources. What Bertling's book gives her/him is but one perspective whether or not one agrees with it is irrelevent. For a different extreme perspective, Harlan Lane comes to mind.

However, your attack upon me, which is incorrect, is but another example for him/her to see the extremes which certain people, like yourself, will resort to when presented with views that differ from their own.

Sorry pagedancer but what flippy is incapable of understanding and/or accepting is that because one chooses to raise their child orally it does not make one an oralist. He can't seem to accept our personal decision for our child and for some strange reason takes it as a personal rebuke of him. What he repeatedly chooses to ignore is that I have stated many, many times that decision we made for our child is not one that we would recommend or advocate for other children, and in fact never have.


Rick
Pray tell, then, oh wise one, what does make one an oralist?
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Deafness

Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com
   
Old 10-03-2009, 12:10 PM   #32 (permalink)
Ear of a Doubt
 
souggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 2,403
Send a message via AIM to souggy Send a message via MSN to souggy
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Pray tell, then, oh wise one, what does make one an oralist?
Oh yes, please explain to the people that went through the abuse of oralism that still continue today? What constitute someone to be an oralist? Be careful. I can testify that it's still around five years ago, and according to many hearing parents-- it has gotten worse in the last 6 months in that school district.

It's kinda like telling an Inuit, who saw things firsthand, that the missionary works in Canada wasn't a form of cultural assimilation when you account for all the things that happened in residential schools.
__________________
Warning! Contains skewed comments & inane ramblings. May cause spontaneous human combustion
souggy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 04:01 PM   #33 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,421
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Pray tell, then, oh wise one, what does make one an oralist?
Sorry, but you, and jillio-lite (souggy), will have to play your little games with someone else. This person is looking for information/sources which I have provided. You are looking to engage in the umpteenth round of a never ending argument. Run along and find someone else to engage in your childish games before you get banned again.
__________________

Beware of Sham Wow immitators!
rick48 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 07:49 PM   #34 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by rick48 View Post
Sorry, but you, and jillio-lite (souggy), will have to play your little games with someone else. This person is looking for information/sources which I have provided. You are looking to engage in the umpteenth round of a never ending argument. Run along and find someone else to engage in your childish games before you get banned again.
Ahhhh....so you don't have an answer for what makes one an oralist. That would mean that you don't know what makes one not an oralist, either. The argument is never ending because your misinformation is never ending.

It would appear that you are terribly threatened by the question.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 07:51 PM   #35 (permalink)
In a pink and black world
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In the land of the free
Posts: 24,083
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by rick48 View Post
Sorry, but you, and jillio-lite (souggy), will have to play your little games with someone else. This person is looking for information/sources which I have provided. You are looking to engage in the umpteenth round of a never ending argument. Run along and find someone else to engage in your childish games before you get banned again.
But you are an oralist.. You support the oralism philosophy.
__________________
Shel~

"A child educated only at school is an uneducated child." -George Santayana


shel90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 08:04 PM   #36 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
But you are an oralist.. You support the oralism philosophy.
Exactly. That is why I asked him what made one an oralist, since he claims that raising your child oral only doesn't make you an oralist.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 08:13 PM   #37 (permalink)
Bodhar agus leath dall
 
Bottesini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Middle of dog pack
Posts: 16,119
Quote:
o⋅ral⋅ist
  /ˈɔrəlɪst, ˈoʊr-/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [awr-uh-list, ohr-]

–noun
1. an advocate of oralism.
2. a deaf person who communicates through lipreading and speech.
–adjective
3. of or pertaining to oralism.


Origin:
1865–70; oral + -ist
Quote:
man⋅u⋅al⋅ist
  /ˈmænyuəlɪst/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [man-yoo-uh-list]

–noun
1. an advocate of manualism.
2. a person who communicates through sign language.
–adjective
3. of or pertaining to manualism.
Compare oralist.

Origin:
1585–95
I do both these.[Not the advocating parts, but they are part of the definition.} So do lots of others. So what does that make us?


http://dictionary.reference.com/
__________________
It's a joke Nathan!
Bottesini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 08:54 PM   #38 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bottesini View Post
I do both these.[Not the advocating parts, but they are part of the definition.} So do lots of others. So what does that make us?


Dictionary.com | Find the Meanings and Definitions of Words at Dictionary.com
Manual oralists?
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 08:55 PM   #39 (permalink)
In a pink and black world
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In the land of the free
Posts: 24,083
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Manual oralists?
I think oralist are those who do not sign at all.

IMO, For someone who has oral skills but use sign language should be called multilingual.
__________________
Shel~

"A child educated only at school is an uneducated child." -George Santayana


shel90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 08:58 PM   #40 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
I think oralist are those who do not sign at all.

IMO, For someone who has oral skills but use sign language should be called multilingual.
I agree. I was just being silly. Someone who promotes both is bilingual and bicultural.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 08:59 PM   #41 (permalink)
Bodhar agus leath dall
 
Bottesini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Middle of dog pack
Posts: 16,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
I think oralist are those who do not sign at all.

IMO, For someone who has oral skills but use sign language should be called multilingual.
I like this term better!
__________________
It's a joke Nathan!
Bottesini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 09:00 PM   #42 (permalink)
Bodhar agus leath dall
 
Bottesini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Middle of dog pack
Posts: 16,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
I agree. I was just being silly. Someone who promotes both is bilingual and bicultural.
Oh, now I am relieved.
__________________
It's a joke Nathan!
Bottesini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 09:04 PM   #43 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bottesini View Post
Oh, now I am relieved.
My comic timing must be off tonight!
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 09:07 PM   #44 (permalink)
Bodhar agus leath dall
 
Bottesini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Middle of dog pack
Posts: 16,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
My comic timing must be off tonight!
Or my sense of humor . Remember Saturday night is the visiting night alloted to my stepmother. Sorry for OT.
__________________
It's a joke Nathan!
Bottesini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 09:09 PM   #45 (permalink)
In a pink and black world
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In the land of the free
Posts: 24,083
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
My comic timing must be off tonight!
I think I am not in a silly mood tonight because I am tired. LOL!
__________________
Shel~

"A child educated only at school is an uneducated child." -George Santayana


shel90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 11:31 PM   #46 (permalink)
Ear of a Doubt
 
souggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 2,403
Send a message via AIM to souggy Send a message via MSN to souggy
shel90 gave the right definition... and she did it in two sentences.

Not hard at all.
__________________
Warning! Contains skewed comments & inane ramblings. May cause spontaneous human combustion
souggy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 11:22 AM   #47 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
But you are an oralist.. You support the oralism philosophy.
I think an oralist would be someone who believes that the oral philosophy is the ONLY appropriate choice for ANY child with a hearing loss. THey would advocate it for all children and adults, to the exclusion of all else.
faire_jour is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 01:40 PM   #48 (permalink)
Weapon of mass percussion
 
rockdrummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 4,090
There is a good definition / explaination here that makes sense to me.


Quote:
an excerpt:
Manualism and oralism are two opposing philosophies regarding the education of deaf people. Manualism and oralism were the products of two very different reform eras in American history, the time period before the Civil War and the time period after the Civil War. [1] Deafness, especially in America, is considered to be a cultural construction. As a result which means that the society’s view of deafness changes across time due to the events that have taken place during particular time periods
Source: Manualism and oralism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
rockdrummer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 05:34 PM   #49 (permalink)
In a pink and black world
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In the land of the free
Posts: 24,083
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
I think an oralist would be someone who believes that the oral philosophy is the ONLY appropriate choice for ANY child with a hearing loss. THey would advocate it for all children and adults, to the exclusion of all else.
Read the definition that Botts has given...

o⋅ral⋅ist
  /ˈɔrəlɪst, ˈoʊr-/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [awr-uh-list, ohr-]

–noun
1. an advocate of oralism.
2. a deaf person who communicates through lipreading and speech.
–adjective
3. of or pertaining to oralism.
__________________
Shel~

"A child educated only at school is an uneducated child." -George Santayana


shel90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 10:25 AM   #50 (permalink)
We are made of star stuff
 
pagedancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 33
I haven't had a chance to comment here for a bit due to a wedding trip, but I am thrilled to see the immense support and offer of resources and personal accounts. I apologize if this thread brought up negative feelings between advocates of varying methods. That was not my intention. To answer some questions about me so it's easier to understand where I'm coming from, yes, I'm studying to be a teacher for the Deaf. I started in January at Hunter College in NYC. The class that this research paper is for is called Education of Students who are Deaf and Hard of Hearing. The paper is meant to be an unbiased study of both Manualism and Oralism, advantages and disadvantages. I want you all to know that these responses have been amazingly helpful and I appreciate every offer. Thank you. If anyone is interested in seeing the paper, I will be happy to share it with you.

Also, shel - may I use a quote from one of your postings? I don't have to put your name if you do not wish it.
This: the oralist philosophy in deaf education puts too many deaf children at a disadvantage over their hearing peers due to the lack of full access to language and information at the educational setting. Even if the child can speak clearly, there is still the issue of receptive language and that's where ASL becomes vital.

Again, thank you to everyone!
__________________
"Pages and dancers become infinitely interesting when turning."
pagedancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 11:11 AM   #51 (permalink)
Weapon of mass percussion
 
rockdrummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 4,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by pagedancer View Post
I haven't had a chance to comment here for a bit due to a wedding trip, but I am thrilled to see the immense support and offer of resources and personal accounts. I apologize if this thread brought up negative feelings between advocates of varying methods. That was not my intention. To answer some questions about me so it's easier to understand where I'm coming from, yes, I'm studying to be a teacher for the Deaf. I started in January at Hunter College in NYC. The class that this research paper is for is called Education of Students who are Deaf and Hard of Hearing. The paper is meant to be an unbiased study of both Manualism and Oralism, advantages and disadvantages. I want you all to know that these responses have been amazingly helpful and I appreciate every offer. Thank you. If anyone is interested in seeing the paper, I will be happy to share it with you.

Also, shel - may I use a quote from one of your postings? I don't have to put your name if you do not wish it.
This: the oralist philosophy in deaf education puts too many deaf children at a disadvantage over their hearing peers due to the lack of full access to language and information at the educational setting. Even if the child can speak clearly, there is still the issue of receptive language and that's where ASL becomes vital.

Again, thank you to everyone!
I have a question for you as an upcomming teacher of deaf kids. I am curious to know what are the thoughts and opinions in the teaching circles regarding bilingual bicultural approach to educating deaf kids?

Thanks
rockdrummer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 02:55 PM   #52 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockdrummer View Post
I have a question for you as an upcomming teacher of deaf kids. I am curious to know what are the thoughts and opinions in the teaching circles regarding bilingual bicultural approach to educating deaf kids?

Thanks
It is the only way to go if you want to educate deaf children in a manner that will put them on par, academically, with their hearing peers.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 10:55 AM   #53 (permalink)
Weapon of mass percussion
 
rockdrummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 4,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
It is the only way to go if you want to educate deaf children in a manner that will put them on par, academically, with their hearing peers.
I understand your view. I just am wondering if it is a common one amongst the teaching community. The reason I ask is because when I brought up bilingual bicultural education at a meeting with my son's teachers, they had no clue what I was talking about.
rockdrummer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 09:28 PM   #54 (permalink)
In a pink and black world
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In the land of the free
Posts: 24,083
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockdrummer View Post
I understand your view. I just am wondering if it is a common one amongst the teaching community. The reason I ask is because when I brought up bilingual bicultural education at a meeting with my son's teachers, they had no clue what I was talking about.
Are your son's teachers certified in Deaf education? If they are certified in regular or special education only then they wouldnt know anything about it.
__________________
Shel~

"A child educated only at school is an uneducated child." -George Santayana


shel90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 09:29 PM   #55 (permalink)
In a pink and black world
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In the land of the free
Posts: 24,083
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
It is the only way to go if you want to educate deaf children in a manner that will put them on par, academically, with their hearing peers.
Yep..
__________________
Shel~

"A child educated only at school is an uneducated child." -George Santayana


shel90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 09:29 PM   #56 (permalink)
In a pink and black world
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In the land of the free
Posts: 24,083
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by pagedancer View Post
I haven't had a chance to comment here for a bit due to a wedding trip, but I am thrilled to see the immense support and offer of resources and personal accounts. I apologize if this thread brought up negative feelings between advocates of varying methods. That was not my intention. To answer some questions about me so it's easier to understand where I'm coming from, yes, I'm studying to be a teacher for the Deaf. I started in January at Hunter College in NYC. The class that this research paper is for is called Education of Students who are Deaf and Hard of Hearing. The paper is meant to be an unbiased study of both Manualism and Oralism, advantages and disadvantages. I want you all to know that these responses have been amazingly helpful and I appreciate every offer. Thank you. If anyone is interested in seeing the paper, I will be happy to share it with you.

Also, shel - may I use a quote from one of your postings? I don't have to put your name if you do not wish it.
This: the oralist philosophy in deaf education puts too many deaf children at a disadvantage over their hearing peers due to the lack of full access to language and information at the educational setting. Even if the child can speak clearly, there is still the issue of receptive language and that's where ASL becomes vital.

Again, thank you to everyone!
Sure, go ahead.
__________________
Shel~

"A child educated only at school is an uneducated child." -George Santayana


shel90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 09:36 PM   #57 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockdrummer View Post
I understand your view. I just am wondering if it is a common one amongst the teaching community. The reason I ask is because when I brought up bilingual bicultural education at a meeting with my son's teachers, they had no clue what I was talking about.
It is a commonly held perspective among TOD's and those who have specific training in the education and learning styles of deaf kids. Generalized special ed teachers don't really have much education in the issues, or the techniques specific to deaf students. Same with regular classroom teachers.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 05:50 AM   #58 (permalink)
In a pink and black world
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In the land of the free
Posts: 24,083
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
It is a commonly held perspective among TOD's and those who have specific training in the education and learning styles of deaf kids. Generalized special ed teachers don't really have much education in the issues, or the techniques specific to deaf students. Same with regular classroom teachers.
Remember my experiences in my undergrad program for special ed regarding to deaf education. How it was only covered in ONE lecture in the whole two years in the program? Also, their solution to teacing deaf children was just to make sure the lighting was good, put the kids at the front of the classroom, and make sure they can see our faces. I couldnt believe it.
__________________
Shel~

"A child educated only at school is an uneducated child." -George Santayana


shel90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 08:26 PM   #59 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
Remember my experiences in my undergrad program for special ed regarding to deaf education. How it was only covered in ONE lecture in the whole two years in the program? Also, their solution to teacing deaf children was just to make sure the lighting was good, put the kids at the front of the classroom, and make sure they can see our faces. I couldnt believe it.
I know. I have looked at the curriculum for special ed at several universities. It is the same at all I have checked. And yet, the mainstream is turning over a deaf child's education to people who have no training in deaf education. It is a frightening situation when people are convinced that these special ed teachers have any expertise at all in deaf ed.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 08:38 PM   #60 (permalink)
So NOT a Princess!
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Trebekistan
Posts: 7,495
Send a message via AIM to deafdyke
Quote:
Tom Bertling's books. "A child sacrificed to Deaf Culture" is his account of his own personal experiences and an interesting and different perspective then is usually presented.
FYI, Bertling used to post at DumbNotes, and he was a sad bitter man.
I have never read the book.........BUT a) He was postlingally dhh, claiming to "speak" for the entire dhh population. b) his story took place WAY before Deaf ed was really reformed (in the old days deaf schools were basicly "basic ed with a heavy dose of vocational training.)
He thinks that oral-only and mainstreaming is the best. He's so bitter about going deaf that's caused him to habor a great deal of resentment against ASL and Deaf schools.

Quote:
Generalized special ed teachers don't really have much education in the issues, or the techniques specific to deaf students. Same with regular classroom teachers.
Amen if a kid doesn't respond well to minimal accomndations, they get lumped in with the "Ummmm who's President So-and So?" kids who're LEGION in special ed!
Quote:
the oralist philosophy in deaf education puts too many deaf children at a disadvantage over their hearing peers due to the lack of full access to language and information at the educational setting. Even if the child can speak clearly, there is still the issue of receptive language and that's where ASL becomes vital.
Not to mention that if a dhh kid has a "deaf voice", they encounter TONS of prejudice from dumbasses who think they're retarded! Oral only skills do not equalize most dhh (b/c ASL benifits hoh kids TOO) kids at ALL!
deafdyke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:10 AM.


Join AllDeaf on Facebook!    Follow us on Twitter!

All text, images, and other content are Copyright © 2002-2009 by AllDeaf.com. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.