AllDeaf.com
Mobile - Perks - Store - Advertise - Spy  

Go Back   AllDeaf.com > Deaf Interests > Sign Language & Oralism
LIKE AllDeaf on Facebook FOLLOW AllDeaf on Twitter
  
Closed Thread
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-19-2009, 12:53 PM   #91 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
Are you implying here that there is one way that is shown to have no cons, and that is the one way that will work for ALL deaf kids? If not, what was this statement saying? Could you be clear?
I don't know how much plainer I can say it. There are methods that have been shown, empircally and anecdotally, to provide the greatest benefit for the majority. As far as all deaf kids are concerned, those methods certainly aren't going to impede all deaf kids. However, there are methods that do impede deaf kids cognitive, educational, psycho-social, and linguistic development.

Please read my words as written, and try not to twist them to your agenda.
jillio is offline  
Alt Today
Deafness

Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com
   
Unread 04-19-2009, 12:54 PM   #92 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frisky Feline View Post
folks, let's focus on the hearing parents who are willing to sign for their deaf kids. it is not about CI or HA or anything. thanks
Thank you, Frisky. Somehow, it always seems that someone must bring any discussion to the CI.
jillio is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 12:54 PM   #93 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frisky Feline View Post
folks, let's focus on the hearing parents who are willing to sign for their deaf kids. it is not about CI or HA or anything. thanks
But to some, that isn't good enough.

How much sign?
Does the parent simcom or do they have to do straight ASL?
Does ASL have to be first or can both languages be learned at the same time?
Is "baby signing" enough if your child is doing well with spoken language?
ASL? or is CASE good enough?
Do they have to go to a voice off ASL school, or can they be mainstreamed with an interpreter?
What if the child develops spoken language and chooses to start dropping signs?
faire_jour is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 12:56 PM   #94 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
I don't know how much plainer I can say it. There are methods that have been shown, empircally and anecdotally, to provide the greatest benefit for the majority. As far as all deaf kids are concerned, those methods certainly aren't going to impede all deaf kids. However, there are methods that do impede deaf kids cognitive, educational, psycho-social, and linguistic development.

Please read my words as written, and try not to twist them to your agenda.
Since when is asking for clarification "twisting words to (my) agenda"?
faire_jour is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 12:57 PM   #95 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
Since when is asking for clarification "twisting words to (my) agenda"?
When you attempt to insert meaning and wording that was never there.
jillio is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 12:57 PM   #96 (permalink)
Prayers for my dad.
 
Cheri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 22,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Just because there are those that chose to ignore the empirical findings does not mean that they don't exist.
Okayyy tell me one thing, how come oral, total communication and cued speech are still around as of today if those programs fails the vast majority of deaf individuals? You've heard stories by each deaf individuals their advantages and disadvantages in each program they were educated in, not all of them experienced the same results. Many do, many don't.
__________________
Avoid being a victim of a stroke, a stroke can happen to anyone at anytime. You will never know how devastating this could be until you had live through it. It affects everybody. So Support Stroke Awareness to find a cure and hope.
Cheri is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 12:57 PM   #97 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 20,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
But to some, that isn't good enough.

How much sign?
Does the parent simcom or do they have to do straight ASL?
Does ASL have to be first or can both languages be learned at the same time?
Is "baby signing" enough if your child is doing well with spoken language?
ASL? or is CASE good enough?
Do they have to go to a voice off ASL school, or can they be mainstreamed with an interpreter?
What if the child develops spoken language and chooses to start dropping signs?
I understand. this isn't what my thread is about.
I just only want to see how many do the hearing parents willing to learn ASL to communciate their kids. This thread is a simple question that doesnt involve with schooling or CI or Spoken language or so on.


Perfect example, gil eastman's quote “Just a thought….it is interesting to see that DEAF people can function in the hearing world very well while hearing people cannot function well in the DEAF world. “ -

that's what it makes me wonder.
Frisky Feline is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 12:57 PM   #98 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
But to some, that isn't good enough.

How much sign?
Does the parent simcom or do they have to do straight ASL?
Does ASL have to be first or can both languages be learned at the same time?
Is "baby signing" enough if your child is doing well with spoken language?
ASL? or is CASE good enough?
Do they have to go to a voice off ASL school, or can they be mainstreamed with an interpreter?
What if the child develops spoken language and chooses to start dropping signs?
Perhaps that is the biggest problem.
jillio is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 12:57 PM   #99 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
When you attempt to insert meaning and wording that was never there.
I asked a question
faire_jour is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 12:58 PM   #100 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
I asked a question
And your question was phrased so as to insert wording and meaning that was never there.
jillio is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 01:00 PM   #101 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Perhaps that is the biggest problem.
I agree.

When parents who ARE using signing are being told that they are still wrong because they aren't using the "right" kind of sign, or that their child isn't in the "right" school, or that they "must" turn off their voice, or that they are evil because they also want speech, that it not ok.
faire_jour is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 01:02 PM   #102 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheri View Post
Okayyy tell me one thing, how come oral, total communication and cued speech are still around as of today if those programs fails the vast majority of deaf individuals? You've heard stories by each deaf individuals their advantages and disadvantages in each program they were educated in, not all of them experienced the same results. Many do, many don't.
They are still around because there are still those parents who insist on attempting to provide for their deaf child in a manner that mimics a hearing child. They are also still around because there are those that refuse to see the empirical findings simply to promote their job security. Oral has only seen a resurgence since certain surgical procedures have been popularized by hearing parents, and used as a justification for not providing visual means of communication for their child. TC is on its way out, and has been for some time. It is rarely used as a methodology by those trained specifically in deaf ed. Cued speech died 40 years ago, and is only now seeing a resurgence in response, once again, to certain surgical procedures. A group of people saw a way to make money off a dead methodology.
jillio is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 01:03 PM   #103 (permalink)
Prayers for my dad.
 
Cheri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 22,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Please read my words as written, and try not to twist them to your agenda.
How did she twisted your words to fit her own agenda, she did asked for clarification.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Faire_jour
Are you implying here that there is one way that is shown to have no cons, and that is the one way that will work for ALL deaf kids? If not, what was this statement saying? Could you be clear?
__________________
Avoid being a victim of a stroke, a stroke can happen to anyone at anytime. You will never know how devastating this could be until you had live through it. It affects everybody. So Support Stroke Awareness to find a cure and hope.
Cheri is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 01:03 PM   #104 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
I agree.

When parents who ARE using signing are being told that they are still wrong because they aren't using the "right" kind of sign, or that their child isn't in the "right" school, or that they "must" turn off their voice, or that they are evil because they also want speech, that it not ok.
Where exactly, are you seeing that?
jillio is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 01:04 PM   #105 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frisky Feline View Post
I understand. this isn't what my thread is about.
I just only want to see how many do the hearing parents willing to learn ASL to communciate their kids. This thread is a simple question that doesnt involve with schooling or CI or Spoken language or so on.


Perfect example, gil eastman's quote “Just a thought….it is interesting to see that DEAF people can function in the hearing world very well while hearing people cannot function well in the DEAF world. “ -

that's what it makes me wonder.
Excellent quote, Frisky.
jillio is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 01:05 PM   #106 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheri View Post
How did she twisted your words to fit her own agenda, she did asked for clarification.
Just go back and read the posts, and you will see that no where did I say anything remotely close to what Faire Jour is assuming was said.
jillio is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 01:05 PM   #107 (permalink)
Joe's Friend
 
Bottesini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: With Owl Sock
Posts: 37,523
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Where exactly, are you seeing that?
Quote:
Is this a community that my child needs to be a part of? Hate filled, disgusting, vile name calling.
Miss Kat's Deaf journey

Perhaps here?
__________________
Bottesini is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 01:06 PM   #108 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Where exactly, are you seeing that?
Everywhere.

People here say that TC should be abandoned and that all Deaf schools should be voice off ASL. They say that SEE is useless (Shel said that earlier in this thread) and that simcom is nothing but a bad model for both languages.

Signing isn't good enough. Signing the *RIGHT* way, is what matters.
faire_jour is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 01:07 PM   #109 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bottesini View Post
Ahhh....yes. Funny how the objectivity gets completely lost, isn't it?
jillio is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 01:07 PM   #110 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bottesini View Post
That post is about you, and you know it.
faire_jour is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 01:08 PM   #111 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Lighthouse77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,167
If you asked my mom, she did not learn ASL nor did anyone in my family.
__________________
Good thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from.
Lighthouse77 is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 01:08 PM   #112 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
Everywhere.

People here say that TC should be abandoned and that all Deaf schools should be voice off ASL. They say that SEE is useless (Shel said that earlier in this thread) and that simcom is nothing but a bad model for both languages.

Signing isn't good enough. Signing the *RIGHT* way, is what matters.
Again, you need to start reading what is written. Obviously, what you are seeing is not what is really being said. Shel did not say SEE was useless. She said it was useful as a teaching tool, not as a means to language development. No one here has ever said that all deaf schools should be voice off ASL. What they have said is that Bi-Bi schools provide the greatest access to academic material for a child that is not hearing, and that oracy is a factor in Bi-Bi. And Sim-Com is a poor model for both languages, as it does not provide a proper model of either ASL or English. That is simply a fact that has been substantiated across several disciplines.
jillio is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 01:09 PM   #113 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Again, you need to start reading what is written. Obviously, what you are seeing is not what is really being said.
So, TC is a good educational philosophy? SimCom should be encouraged? How about SEE?
faire_jour is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 01:13 PM   #114 (permalink)
Prayers for my dad.
 
Cheri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 22,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Just go back and read the posts, and you will see that no where did I say anything remotely close to what Faire Jour is assuming was said.
Again she DID ASKED if that is what you're saying, that is asking for clarification, not assuming. You can't even admit your wrongs, go figures.

Not everyone is going to understand each others, why can't you be a bit more kind and repeat what you said instead of making it so difficult.
__________________
Avoid being a victim of a stroke, a stroke can happen to anyone at anytime. You will never know how devastating this could be until you had live through it. It affects everybody. So Support Stroke Awareness to find a cure and hope.
Cheri is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 01:14 PM   #115 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
So, TC is a good educational philosophy? SimCom should be encouraged? How about SEE?
No, TC is not the best educational philosophy, for any number of reasons that have all been identified any number of times on this forum and in research findings. SEE may be useful as a teaching tool. However, it is not a language, it is an MCE. It is not arranged to be processed visually, and therefore, is confusing in syntax and concept. SimCom, as I have stated, provides for a confusing linguistic environment, so I would not encourage it unless I also wanted to encourage misunderstanding.
jillio is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 01:14 PM   #116 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheri View Post
Again she DID ASKED if that is what you're saying, that is asking for clarification, not assuming. You can't even admit your wrongs, go figures.
Again, Cheri, go back and read the posts.
jillio is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 01:15 PM   #117 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
No, TC is not the best educational philosophy, for any number of reasons that have all been identified any number of times on this forum and in research findings. SEE may be useful as a teaching tool. However, it is not a language, it is an MCE. It is not arranged to be processed visually, and therefore, is confusing in syntax and concept. SimCom, as I have stated, provides for a confusing linguistic environment, so I would not encourage it unless I also wanted to encourage misunderstanding.
So, signing is not encouraged, ASL is.
faire_jour is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 01:16 PM   #118 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
So, signing is not encouraged, ASL is.
How in the world do you reach that conclusion?
jillio is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 01:16 PM   #119 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheri View Post
Again she DID ASKED if that is what you're saying, that is asking for clarification, not assuming. You can't even admit your wrongs, go figures.

Not everyone is going to understand each others, why can't you be more kindly and repeat what you said instead of making it so difficult.
Careful, if you side with me even for a second, they might take away your Deaf badge.
faire_jour is offline  
Unread 04-19-2009, 01:18 PM   #120 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
How in the world do you reach that conclusion?
You just said that SEE is not appropriate. So, if a parent chooses to sign SEE instead of ASL, they are still wrong.
faire_jour is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 AM.


Join AllDeaf on Facebook!    Follow us on Twitter!

AllDeaf proudly supports St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Copyright © 2002-2013, AllDeaf.com. All Rights Reserved.