AllDeaf.com
Our Sponsors

Go Back   AllDeaf.com > Deaf Interests > Sign Language & Oralism
  
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-30-2008, 06:07 AM   #1 (permalink)
ASL Student
 
AquaBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 1,381
Send a message via AIM to AquaBlue
Classifiers...

My Deaf (ASL) teacher told the class a few weeks ago that classifiers are used 80% of the time in ASL communication. Is this true?
__________________
Currently Reading: The Story of Edgar Sawtelle by David Wroblewski

My Book List
My Bipolar Page
AquaBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Deafness

Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com
   
Old 06-30-2008, 11:59 AM   #2 (permalink)
HOH terp
 
Etoile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 926
80% of the time, or in 80% of ASL? Yes, classifiers make up most of an ASL conversation, but not all of it. Also, it is unusual to find an ASL conversation that does not include classifiers.
__________________
"You must not lose faith in humanity. Humanity is an ocean; if a few drops of the ocean are dirty, the ocean does not become dirty." -Gandhi
Etoile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 09:40 PM   #3 (permalink)
Jasmine's Tiger "Lilly"
 
deafbajagal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 2,117
Send a message via AIM to deafbajagal
Classifers are the "meat" of ASL, IMO.
deafbajagal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 10:21 PM   #4 (permalink)
ASL Student
 
AquaBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 1,381
Send a message via AIM to AquaBlue
Quote:
Originally Posted by Etoile View Post
80% of the time, or in 80% of ASL? Yes, classifiers make up most of an ASL conversation, but not all of it. Also, it is unusual to find an ASL conversation that does not include classifiers.
80% of ASL

Wow! Good to know.
__________________
Currently Reading: The Story of Edgar Sawtelle by David Wroblewski

My Book List
My Bipolar Page
AquaBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 10:52 PM   #5 (permalink)
Crime fighter
 
Interpretrator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,425
Where is the source for that 80% statistic? Or was your teacher just making up a number to prove the point?

I really doubt my conversations are 80% classifiers. There are, though, lots of signs that people will argue about whether they are really signs or if they're classifiers.
Interpretrator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 11:12 PM   #6 (permalink)
ASL Student
 
AquaBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 1,381
Send a message via AIM to AquaBlue
I do not know Interpretrator. My Deaf teacher said it is 80%. Beats me where he got that percentage. What percentage would you say Interpretrator?

I am a student and all I do is listen to my ASL teacher and trust what he tells me. Is he wrong?
__________________
Currently Reading: The Story of Edgar Sawtelle by David Wroblewski

My Book List
My Bipolar Page
AquaBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 11:19 PM   #7 (permalink)
HOH terp
 
Etoile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 926
Quote:
Originally Posted by AquaBlue View Post
I am a student and all I do is listen to my ASL teacher and trust what he tells me. Is he wrong?
Let's just say it's subjective. You can't definitively say that 80% or 24% or any percent of ASL is classifiers...the correct answer is, "It depends."
__________________
"You must not lose faith in humanity. Humanity is an ocean; if a few drops of the ocean are dirty, the ocean does not become dirty." -Gandhi
Etoile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 11:40 PM   #8 (permalink)
ASL Student
 
AquaBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 1,381
Send a message via AIM to AquaBlue
On another note, my deaf teacher also told me that a small, very, very small (he estimated 2%) percentage of hearing student study at Gallaudet University. He also told me, being a former student of Gally himself, that most teachers teach via ASL- no spoken words. Is that true?

Etoile: You know that there might be a chance for me to attend Gally. I am, as you know, disabled (bipolar)- disability can pay for my tuition. I will look into it tomorrow (or this week for sure) what the facts are regarding my chance to attend Gally.
__________________
Currently Reading: The Story of Edgar Sawtelle by David Wroblewski

My Book List
My Bipolar Page
AquaBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 12:38 AM   #9 (permalink)
TERP student
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 486
Send a message via MSN to RDC_girl
Quote:
Originally Posted by AquaBlue View Post
My Deaf (ASL) teacher told the class a few weeks ago that classifiers are used 80% of the time in ASL communication. Is this true?
Yeah the woman I work with has said this "80% of the conversation is Classifiers"

I find it hard to use classifiers, but I am getting better lol
RDC_girl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 12:41 AM   #10 (permalink)
ASL Student
 
AquaBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 1,381
Send a message via AIM to AquaBlue
I like classifiers. I used them more than I think when I sign.
__________________
Currently Reading: The Story of Edgar Sawtelle by David Wroblewski

My Book List
My Bipolar Page
AquaBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 12:58 AM   #11 (permalink)
Crime fighter
 
Interpretrator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Etoile View Post
the correct answer is, "It depends."
Agreed.

If someone can find a citation for me I'll take it back but I doubt there've been any definitive studies concluding what percentage of ASL is classifiers.
Interpretrator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 01:00 AM   #12 (permalink)
ASL Student
 
AquaBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 1,381
Send a message via AIM to AquaBlue
Quote:
Originally Posted by Interpretrator View Post
Agreed.

If someone can find a citation for me I'll take it back but I doubt there've been any definitive studies concluding what percentage of ASL is classifiers.
That's fair; I agree too. So what would be a good (and accurate) percentage?
__________________
Currently Reading: The Story of Edgar Sawtelle by David Wroblewski

My Book List
My Bipolar Page
AquaBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 01:01 AM   #13 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Gemma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 961
Ill be the brave one and ask.........


What is a classifier?

Gemma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 01:02 AM   #14 (permalink)
ASL Student
 
AquaBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 1,381
Send a message via AIM to AquaBlue
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gemma View Post
Ill be the brave one and ask.........


What is a classifier?

Click Here Gemma.
__________________
Currently Reading: The Story of Edgar Sawtelle by David Wroblewski

My Book List
My Bipolar Page
AquaBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 01:25 AM   #15 (permalink)
Chicken in a Cat Suit
 
AlleyCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 884
Most ASL teachers are indeed deaf and start right out using ASL, no voice. It's a good way to learn, IMO.

As far as classifiers go, this is something hearing people look at when learning sign. Not so much for the deaf, IMO. Not sure if that makes a difference in answering your question. I guess I find when deaf people are learning sign for the first time, they are picking up signs from other deaf people and/or from a sign language class. So classifiers aren't thought of as much in the deaf community. For example, the classifier 1 used to indicate a person walking, or the number one, etc., isn't thought of as the classifer 1, but simply the sign for the person walking or the number one. So I think all of us deaf people use classifiers without realizing it, but I'm not sure exactly how it is a learning tool for the hearies. Care to elaborate on why your teacher mentioned this, and the importance? I'm curious ...
__________________
Never put off until tomorrow what you can do today.


AlleyCat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 01:32 AM   #16 (permalink)
ASL Student
 
AquaBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 1,381
Send a message via AIM to AquaBlue
Well my deaf teacher uses classifiers ALOT. I picked that up early in the course. We use the ABC text and have gone over that part of ASL. It's pretty simple really...no big deal. It was part of the lesson that's all. Another learned item that's makes a ton of sense to clarify whatever is being signed.
__________________
Currently Reading: The Story of Edgar Sawtelle by David Wroblewski

My Book List
My Bipolar Page
AquaBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 01:36 AM   #17 (permalink)
Chicken in a Cat Suit
 
AlleyCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 884
Oh, not saying anything's wrong with classifiers. I just don't see/hear about it being used in the deaf community, only in the hearing community. And was wondering how it enhances your learning skills, that's all.
__________________
Never put off until tomorrow what you can do today.


AlleyCat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 01:41 AM   #18 (permalink)
ASL Student
 
AquaBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 1,381
Send a message via AIM to AquaBlue
oh ok. It enhances my learning because it helps me read what the other signer is communicating better. So with deaf, classifiers are a natural way to sign...no definition of classifiers, as far as text book knowledge. Is that what you mean AlleyCat?
__________________
Currently Reading: The Story of Edgar Sawtelle by David Wroblewski

My Book List
My Bipolar Page
AquaBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 01:53 AM   #19 (permalink)
Chicken in a Cat Suit
 
AlleyCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 884
I think so .. I guess I'm thinking that like I said earlier, when a deaf person (even at adult age) is learning sign for the first time, learning the sign for a deaf person walking can be used with one finger and "wandering" about (for lack of better way of explaining that sign) is thought of to be just that, whereas a hearing person learning learning sign learns it as a classifier .. not that there is anything wrong with that in the least ... I'm confused as to how learning it as as a classifer is better/different (if any) than learning the same sign as a person walking vs. as a classifier 1?
__________________
Never put off until tomorrow what you can do today.


AlleyCat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 05:37 AM   #20 (permalink)
Implanted 7/18/07
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 749
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlleyCat View Post
I think so .. I guess I'm thinking that like I said earlier, when a deaf person (even at adult age) is learning sign for the first time, learning the sign for a deaf person walking can be used with one finger and "wandering" about (for lack of better way of explaining that sign) is thought of to be just that, whereas a hearing person learning learning sign learns it as a classifier .. not that there is anything wrong with that in the least ... I'm confused as to how learning it as as a classifer is better/different (if any) than learning the same sign as a person walking vs. as a classifier 1?
I'm one of those folks (deaf, learned ASL late). We did discuss classifiers some in the classes I took, but I did realize later on that some signs I had learned could be used as classifiers. The reason to teach classifiers as such, I think, is that spoken languages don't use words that way. In my own head, I have some things listed as classifiers, and some things as signs, and some in between - so while usually I think of WALKING as a classifier, I tend to think of FENCE as a sign that can be used in classifier-like ways. I think the pitfall a lot of ASL students hit - I certainly did - is not realizing that *lots* of things can be used to spatially in ASL, regardless of whether it's formally a classifier or not.
ismi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 12:45 PM   #21 (permalink)
HOH terp
 
Etoile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 926
Quote:
Originally Posted by AquaBlue View Post
On another note, my deaf teacher also told me that a small, very, very small (he estimated 2%) percentage of hearing student study at Gallaudet University. He also told me, being a former student of Gally himself, that most teachers teach via ASL- no spoken words. Is that true?

Etoile: You know that there might be a chance for me to attend Gally. I am, as you know, disabled (bipolar)- disability can pay for my tuition. I will look into it tomorrow (or this week for sure) what the facts are regarding my chance to attend Gally.
Yes, there are hearing students at Gally, they are called HUGs (Hearing Undergraduates). I was originally accepted as a HUG before they determined I have a hearing loss. You must be fluent in ASL, there is a screening to determine what level you are (ASLPI) and they require fluency. Yes, most teachers use ASL without speaking, though some sim-com. There is also an ethical interview. There are only about 10 HUG students accepted every year, and you have to write essays for it, etc. It's actually a very competitive program, I think they have about 75 students apply every year and only 10-12 get in.

VR does not pay full tuition, they mostly pay for books. SSI helps with the expenses but it doesn't pay your full tuition. Some students get scholarships and grants. Keep in mind that these things are usually awarded to deaf students first - hearing students almost always have to pay their own way completely, even if they have another disability.

Not trying to be discouraging - those are just the facts. It's a tough program to get into if you're hearing.
__________________
"You must not lose faith in humanity. Humanity is an ocean; if a few drops of the ocean are dirty, the ocean does not become dirty." -Gandhi
Etoile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 02:35 PM   #22 (permalink)
ASL Student
 
AquaBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 1,381
Send a message via AIM to AquaBlue
You popped my bubble Etoile.

Ooh well. Forward with my second option, Flagler College. My third option is city college. Let's see what happens.
__________________
Currently Reading: The Story of Edgar Sawtelle by David Wroblewski

My Book List
My Bipolar Page
AquaBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2008, 07:11 AM   #23 (permalink)
AAACCK! I got BORGED!
 
deafskeptic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,452
Mmm. This is an interesting thread. I've always seen the 3 CL as the "ship" classifier even though it can be applied to all vehicles and it's why I keep calling the zeppelins in WoW the ship... in English.
__________________
Left ear implanted with Med-El on April 24 2007.
Activated on May 9th.
deafskeptic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:00 AM.


Join AllDeaf on Facebook!

All text, images, and other content are Copyright © 2002-2008 by AllDeaf.com. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.