AllDeaf.com
Our Sponsors

Go Back   AllDeaf.com > Deaf Interests > Sign Language & Oralism
  
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-17-2008, 02:36 PM   #1 (permalink)
Wacky Oddball
 
Oddball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cleveland native now lives in New Jersey.
Posts: 3,186
A hearing baby can learn sign language, why does it deny a Deaf baby from learning?

This picture is coming from...moeart.com

http://www.moeart.com/blog/wp-conten.../07/babies.jpg

Now, can you tell me why can a hearing baby learn to communicate in sign language whereas forbid a Deaf baby from communicating in sign language? What is wrong with this picture? (Please keep in mind, I emphasize on parents of deaf children who are in denial).

Discuss it!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg babies.jpg (29.1 KB, 20 views)
Oddball is offline   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Deafness

Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com
   
Old 05-17-2008, 02:38 PM   #2 (permalink)
bloody phreak from hell
 
VamPyroX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hell
Posts: 27,867
Send a message via ICQ to VamPyroX Send a message via AIM to VamPyroX Send a message via Yahoo to VamPyroX
Who stated this rule?
__________________

Check out my city... CLICK HERE!
(If you already visited yesterday, visit again today!)
VamPyroX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 02:45 PM   #3 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,197
I don't think its a rule....just a general way of life.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 02:51 PM   #4 (permalink)
Wacky Oddball
 
Oddball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cleveland native now lives in New Jersey.
Posts: 3,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by VamPyroX View Post
Who stated this rule?
Nope. I want to bring this up because that's how I perceive this situation between a deaf baby and a hearing baby who are given sign language. I have seen some parents want their deaf babies to get "fixed." The babies are denied from learning other tools such as sign language added to their oral skills.

Some of hearing babies can access into anything included sign language from early on.

That's something I don't understand the difference between two.

(FYI, I am not a Deaf militant)
Oddball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 03:12 PM   #5 (permalink)
Jessie's Character
 
KarissaMann05's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,848
Blog Entries: 7
Send a message via AIM to KarissaMann05 Send a message via MSN to KarissaMann05 Send a message via Yahoo to KarissaMann05
Long ago, my sister learned sign language at around 18 months old while I already know signing. She didn't talk until she was around two years old and I was only four years old. Now, today, I noticed many baby deafies don't take signing. That's sadden me.
__________________

Credit by KarissaMann05
KarissaMann05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 04:12 PM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jenni-m's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 598
Is just how society is, unfortunately. We can only try to educate who we can.

Many children who do things 'differently' because of 'disability' (nobody yell at me, I put the words in quotes...) are forced to do things another way. This used to be more common, even left handed babies forced to use their right hand... but this seems to be getting better. I'm not sure if it will ever completely go away, but the more we educate, the better it will become, I think.
jenni-m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 04:27 PM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 91
because they are afraid that a deaf baby will be too depended on signing.. A hearing baby will learn to speak no matter what.

but yeah, they say "teach your baby to sign so she won't be frustrated"
Rainshower77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 05:37 PM   #8 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,197
Their "fears" are ungrounded and were disproven years ago.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 06:50 PM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 23
The people who suggest signing for hearing babies are not the same ones who forbid signing for deaf babies.

I suppose.
RilianSharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 07:00 PM   #10 (permalink)
bloody phreak from hell
 
VamPyroX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hell
Posts: 27,867
Send a message via ICQ to VamPyroX Send a message via AIM to VamPyroX Send a message via Yahoo to VamPyroX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oddball View Post
Nope. I want to bring this up because that's how I perceive this situation between a deaf baby and a hearing baby who are given sign language. I have seen some parents want their deaf babies to get "fixed." The babies are denied from learning other tools such as sign language added to their oral skills.

Some of hearing babies can access into anything included sign language from early on.

That's something I don't understand the difference between two.

(FYI, I am not a Deaf militant)
Oh, ok. That's something I've never heard of. Everyone I know who is deaf with deaf kids usually sign to their deaf kids. Everyone I know who is hearing with deaf kids still learn sign language themselves while teaching their deaf kids sign language. (I guess it's because they know me?)
__________________

Check out my city... CLICK HERE!
(If you already visited yesterday, visit again today!)
VamPyroX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 07:56 PM   #11 (permalink)
will be very busy soon
 
moonflower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Washtenaw County, Michigan
Posts: 4,880
it look cruel to me sorry that is my POV

if i have deaf baby the baby will LEARN signs i don't give a fuck if people said i can't teach deaf baby
when i was little i start to learn to sign when i was 3 1/2 and my mom, my older sister did learn along with me and my brother did followed me too to learn sign when he was almost one year old since that my mom and my sister did learn signs.
now his daughter (my little niece) is learning to signs because of me he thought it will be cool if she can communicate with me, my brother always come to me for some help with signs.

i don't care how cruel the world is to deafies
__________________
http://www.alldeaf.com/signaturepics/sigpic5722_6.gif

my little niece born 11/1/08
moonflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 08:16 PM   #12 (permalink)
Az Monsoon Summer Lover!
 
Boult's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tucson
Posts: 4,236
The cartoon has "Thre Greatest Irony" was based on this blog...
DEAF WORLD AS EYE SEE IT » The Greatest Irony
as well as this
rays of raychelle: The Greatest Irony: Deaf Baby Cuffed, Hearing Baby Learns ASL!

There's a thread on AD
http://www.alldeaf.com/sign-language...est-irony.html
__________________
Boult I.T.M.F.A.
I am a CI Borg, Proud to be and loving it!
MYTHS AND LIES ABOUT CI / New Chat Rooms Social / Internet Explorer Users: Switch to Safari / Get a Mac
Quote:
I find that when I'm channel surfing, Fox News is like that carton of milk way past its expiration date, taunting you from the back of the refrigerator. You KNOW it's gonna smell, but still you open it up and take a whiff. by: bc68251 on February 21, 2006
Boult is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 08:33 PM   #13 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,316
My deaf sister was four when I came along. Our parents couldn't or wouldn't learn sign, so she taught me. All I remember is thinking it was the way of the world to speak to some and sign to others . . . and puzzle as to why everyone wasn't "programmed" that way.
Chase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 12:59 AM   #14 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chase View Post
My deaf sister was four when I came along. Our parents couldn't or wouldn't learn sign, so she taught me. All I remember is thinking it was the way of the world to speak to some and sign to others . . . and puzzle as to why everyone wasn't "programmed" that way.
Makes perfect sense. My son, for the longest time, did not see deaf as lack of auditory function and hearing as having auditory function. Tohim, the difference was that deaf signed and hearing spoke. In fact, I didn't realize it until I saw him tell another child, but he believed I was deaf because I signed. When he was about six, I saw him tell another kid that "Mommy deaf." I asked him later why he told his friend that and he reiterated, "Mommy deaf". I asked, "Believe mommy deaf, why?" His reply was, "Mommy sign, mommy deaf." I had no idea that he did not understand that I was hearing.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 01:17 AM   #15 (permalink)
Up to a loud future !
 
Cloggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 3,794
Blog Entries: 5
Send a message via Yahoo to Cloggy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oddball View Post
This picture is coming from...Maureen Klusza - illustration & design

http://www.moeart.com/blog/wp-conten.../07/babies.jpg

Now, can you tell me why can a hearing baby learn to communicate in sign language whereas forbid a Deaf baby from communicating in sign language? What is wrong with this picture? (Please keep in mind, I emphasize on parents of deaf children who are in denial).

Discuss it!
Children will learn the language of their parents first. Lately parents realize that babies can pick up signs quicker than speech, but I would not call that sign-language.
These babies (and their parents) will discontinue signs when the child starts communicating with speech.

So, "sign language" for hearing babies and sign language for deaf babies are not related.
__________________
.
The limits of my language mean the limits of my world.
. . . Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889 - 1951)

Information about . . . . . . . . .
My daughter . . . . . . . . . How the ear works . . . . . . . . . Nonsense/ Myths about CI, here,or here.

Last edited by ~SG~; 05-18-2008 at 09:16 AM. Reason: edited "sign language"
Cloggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 01:22 AM   #16 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloggy View Post
Children will learn the language of their parents first. Lately parents realize that babies can pick up signs quicker than speech, but I would not call that sign-language.
These babies (and their parents) will discontinue signs when the child starts communicating with speech.

So, "sign language" for hearing babies and signlanguage for deaf babies are not related.
Not all people discontinue sign because a child has developed some speech.

Last edited by ~SG~; 05-18-2008 at 09:15 AM. Reason: edited "sign language" and "child has"
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 02:14 AM   #17 (permalink)
Anobium Pertinax
 
Buffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by VamPyroX View Post
Oh, ok. That's something I've never heard of. Everyone I know who is deaf with deaf kids usually sign to their deaf kids. Everyone I know who is hearing with deaf kids still learn sign language themselves while teaching their deaf kids sign language. (I guess it's because they know me?)
Excuse me for pointing out your post in 'Parents apathy in their deaf children's edcuational progress etc' (http://www.alldeaf.com/deaf-educatio...tml#post922270) and the post (#25) is:

Quote:
Originally Posted by VamPryox
Some parents are like that. I know someone who recently had a deaf baby. Instead of actually accepting the fact that her baby is deaf, she always makes sure that the baby has his hearing aids on 24/7, exposes him to everything that's musical, tries to find information on why the baby is deaf so that she has something else to blame, does not use sign language (even though she knows sign language herself) to communicate a bit with the baby, etc. She's probably one of the worse mother-with-a-deaf-child that I've ever seen. Grr!
I remember this post because it really haunts me. By the way, is there any change in that deaf child's situtation????
__________________

It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.
- Gilbert Chesterton

Last edited by Buffalo; 05-18-2008 at 02:34 AM.
Buffalo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 02:39 AM   #18 (permalink)
bloody phreak from hell
 
VamPyroX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hell
Posts: 27,867
Send a message via ICQ to VamPyroX Send a message via AIM to VamPyroX Send a message via Yahoo to VamPyroX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buffalo View Post
Excuse me for pointing out your post in 'Parents apathy in their deaf children's edcuational progress etc' (http://www.alldeaf.com/deaf-educatio...tml#post922270) and the post (#25) is:



I remember this post because it really haunts me. By the way, is there any change in that deaf child's situtation????
No changes yet. He's almost 11 months old. He's already crawling fast and very alert of his surroundings, but nothing related to communication.
__________________

Check out my city... CLICK HERE!
(If you already visited yesterday, visit again today!)
VamPyroX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 08:33 AM   #19 (permalink)
Sun Whorshipper
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: A Desert Rat that has found herself in Maryland
Posts: 16,155
Blog Entries: 1
Despite learning speech, I wish I had sign language growing up and I wish my parents learned it.
__________________
~Shel~

"A child educated only at school is an uneducated child." -George Santayana
shel90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 09:19 AM   #20 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by VamPyroX View Post
No changes yet. He's almost 11 months old. He's already crawling fast and very alert of his surroundings, but nothing related to communication.
Sad situation for that child.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 09:21 AM   #21 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Not all people discontinue sign because a child has developed some speech.
Before anyone jumps my case saying I didn't understand cloggy's post, those edits the mod did were to his post, not mine. Thanks!
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2008, 07:03 PM   #22 (permalink)
Registered User
 
loml's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,314
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oddball View Post
Nope. I want to bring this up because that's how I perceive this situation between a deaf baby and a hearing baby who are given sign language. I have seen some parents want their deaf babies to get "fixed." The babies are denied from learning other tools such as sign language added to their oral skills.

Some of hearing babies can access into anything included sign language from early on.

That's something I don't understand the difference between two.

(FYI, I am not a Deaf militant)
Oddball: The hearing parents are not teaching a language. They are signing the "odd" word(s) in the voiced English sentence. That does not make it sign language, but voiced English with some visual cues.imo

Hearing parents of hearing babies do not concern themselves with signing as being their childs only form of communication.

jmo
__________________
Quote:
....Cued Speech has substantial data showing that it enables deaf children to attain competency in English at the level of hearing students grade by grade. I know of no other system that enables this to happen.... As more and more young deaf persons achieve academically because of this system, deaf leaders will need to re-examine their options.
- Dr. Edward C. Merrill, Jr. past president of Gallaudet
loml is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2008, 09:07 PM   #23 (permalink)
bloody phreak from hell
 
VamPyroX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hell
Posts: 27,867
Send a message via ICQ to VamPyroX Send a message via AIM to VamPyroX Send a message via Yahoo to VamPyroX
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Sad situation for that child.
For a deaf child (or any child), when do they normally begin communicating?
__________________

Check out my city... CLICK HERE!
(If you already visited yesterday, visit again today!)
VamPyroX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2008, 10:07 PM   #24 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by loml View Post
Oddball: The hearing parents are not teaching a language. They are signing the "odd" word(s) in the voiced English sentence. That does not make it sign language, but voiced English with some visual cues.imo

Hearing parents of hearing babies do not concern themselves with signing as being their childs only form of communication.

jmo
Voiced English with some visual cues....you just described CS.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2008, 10:09 PM   #25 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by VamPyroX View Post
For a deaf child (or any child), when do they normally begin communicating?
A hearing child will normally say their first word at approximately 9-12 months. A baby who is exposed to sign will normally approximate the first formal sign at around 6 months. But even prior to that, they will begin attempts at communication by pointing objects that they want, reaching up when they want to be held, or by babbling in psuedo-conversations with their caregivers.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2008, 08:42 AM   #26 (permalink)
Up to a loud future !