Perks - Advertise - Spy - Who Quoted Me  
Go Back > Miscellaneous > Sports Talk
LIKE AllDeaf on Facebook FOLLOW AllDeaf on Twitter
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-03-2012, 10:21 AM   #1
Registered User
dereksbicycles's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: 60202
Posts: 6,438
Likes: 145
Liked 333 Times in 172 Posts
Send a message via AIM to dereksbicycles
Lower ERAs aren't always better than higher ERAs

Let's say there are 2 pitchers. One has an ERA of 2.60. The other has 3.45.

Many people will look at this and figure-----lower era is the best. I'll want to have the pitcher with 2.60 ERA. What people fail to look at are various factors.

Factor 1:

Pitcher with 2.60 ERA may have pitched 165 innings. The one with 3.45 ERA may have pitched 235 innings. So therefore, it's normal for one with 3.45 ERA to get tired from pitching so many innings.

Factor 2:

Let's say you're pitching with a 3-2 lead, you'll be very, very careful. If you allow one more run, you risk losing the game.

Now if you're pitching with a 8-2 lead, you would let it off a little bit. Not too worried about giving 2 or 3 runs.

Factor 3:

Altitude----see how balls fly out in Colorado.

Factor 4:

Weather condition----maybe one pitcher has been forced to pitch in rain or cold weather a lot more than the other one so ERA is higher.

Baseball fans!!!! Tell me what you think or add to it.
dereksbicycles is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 PM.

Join AllDeaf on Facebook!    Follow us on Twitter!

AllDeaf proudly supports St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Copyright © 2002-2016, All Rights Reserved.