FCC deny Soresnon stay request

qwerty123 · 07-10-2010, 05:32 PM

http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...-10-1287A1.pdf

We have before us a motion filed by Sorenson Communications, Inc. seeking a stay of the effect of interim rates for Video Relay Service (VRS) adopted by the Commission in a recent order.1 Although Sorenson nominally seeks a “stay,” it asks not just that we stay the interim rates, but also that we take affirmative steps to re-institute the former VRS rate that expired on June 30, 2010. For the reasons set forth below, we deny the request.

66dude · 07-10-2010, 06:06 PM

Good.

netrox · 07-10-2010, 07:01 PM

Can't believe that SVRS is demanding special treatment.

netrox · 07-10-2010, 07:02 PM

BTW, I stopped using SVRS. I am boycotting SVRS.

Tousi · 07-10-2010, 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by netrox

BTW, I stopped using SVRS. I am boycotting SVRS.

Yes, especially since they have 84% market share! If the competition doesn't get better, I'm reminded that I saw something somewhere not too long ago about a Congressman maybe wants to look at this.....monopolizing, yanno....?

**Banjo** · 07-10-2010, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tousi

Yes, especially since they have 84% market share! If the competition doesn't get better, I'm reminded that I saw something somewhere not too long ago about a Congressman maybe wants to look at this.....monopolizing, yanno....?

So are they basically the 21st century of the AT&T monopoly back in the 80s? Hee.

**Chevy57** · 07-11-2010, 07:02 AM

Quote:

It would be especially unwarranted to return to the Tier III rate of $6.24 per minute that applied under the 2007 Rate Order, which the Commission has recognized “significantly exceeded the estimate average per-minute costs of providing VRS.”

FCC said.

Return back to $6.24?

qwerty123 · 07-30-2010, 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by qwerty123

http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...-10-1287A1.pdf

We have before us a motion filed by Sorenson Communications, Inc. seeking a stay of the effect of interim rates for Video Relay Service (VRS) adopted by the Commission in a recent order.1 Although Sorenson nominally seeks a “stay,” it asks not just that we stay the interim rates, but also that we take affirmative steps to re-institute the former VRS rate that expired on June 30, 2010. For the reasons set forth below, we deny the request.

appeal court deny stay request yestreday

**Chevy57** · 07-30-2010, 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by qwerty123

appeal court deny stay request yestreday

Source?

posts from hell · 08-02-2010, 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chevy57

FCC said.

Return back to $6.24?

Says unwarranted... so, i doubt it.

posts from hell · 08-02-2010, 11:33 PM

lol at #21...

Jeff Harris · 08-04-2010, 02:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by netrox

Can't believe that SVRS is demanding special treatment.

In an age where it seems everyone wants more from the federal gov't, it's refreshing to see someone as selfless as you.

You are willing to accept less for yourself and the deaf community, so others that need funding can get the monies that used to be spent on VRS.

**Chevy57** · 08-04-2010, 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by posts from hell

Says unwarranted... so, i doubt it.

YES, Sorenson still cry to need same rate as last year. I don't care with them.

Sargeras · 08-05-2010, 06:48 AM

I've reviewed the entire document and it bothers me that they're blacking out a lot of information of how this FCC Interim rate will affect Sorenson, by their own explanation. Additionally, few of these blackouts are declaration made by Scott K. Sorenson.

I wonder if we can obtain an complete copy of this Order.

ComputerLover · 08-08-2010, 02:22 PM

Layoffs Explained | Sorenson VRS®

zerodog · 08-08-2010, 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ComputerLover

Layoffs Explained | Sorenson VRS®

I do not know if you are work for Sorenson or not.. the practice script per by management told you to share the community.

Just remember.. if you are employee Sorenson... It only 6 months... other more lay off... only if the rate drop 4 cents.

07-10-2010, 05:32 PM	#1 (permalink)
qwerty123 Registered User Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,276	FCC deny Soresnon stay request http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...-10-1287A1.pdf We have before us a motion filed by Sorenson Communications, Inc. seeking a stay of the effect of interim rates for Video Relay Service (VRS) adopted by the Commission in a recent order.1 Although Sorenson nominally seeks a “stay,” it asks not just that we stay the interim rates, but also that we take affirmative steps to re-institute the former VRS rate that expired on June 30, 2010. For the reasons set forth below, we deny the request.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Today
Deafness	Sponsored Links __________________ This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com

07-10-2010, 06:06 PM	#2 (permalink)
66dude Registered User Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 75	Good.

07-10-2010, 07:01 PM	#3 (permalink)
netrox Registered User Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 4,780	Can't believe that SVRS is demanding special treatment.

07-10-2010, 07:02 PM	#4 (permalink)
netrox Registered User Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 4,780	BTW, I stopped using SVRS. I am boycotting SVRS.

08-02-2010, 11:33 PM	#11 (permalink)
posts from hell Registered User Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 9,433	lol at #21...

08-05-2010, 06:48 AM	#14 (permalink)
Sargeras Registered User Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 9	I've reviewed the entire document and it bothers me that they're blacking out a lot of information of how this FCC Interim rate will affect Sorenson, by their own explanation. Additionally, few of these blackouts are declaration made by Scott K. Sorenson. I wonder if we can obtain an complete copy of this Order.

08-08-2010, 02:22 PM	#15 (permalink)
ComputerLover Registered User Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 484	Layoffs Explained \| Sorenson VRS®