![]() |
|
|||||
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Good times, good times.
![]() |
VRS in competition!
Gee, I just got this forwarded email from dbarovian
Quote:
Wow, they build many VP's and there is no end coming in our sight. VRS are in the compeition in USA!
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 111
|
After all these years, it's about time!!! Thanks to Sorenson's and SnapVRS's willingness to invest in videophone technologies, the other companies have realized that if they want to stay in the game, they must also make similiar investmetns. The difference is that CSDVRS and Viable both want to charge Deafies for the equipment...not sure if that'll be a good business model for them unless the videophone technologies being offered are subsidized blockbusters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5
|
Charge deafies ... not good business model?
Not sure why you think selling videophone equipment is not good business model - they argue that owning equipment gives you more rights i.e. warranty, customer service support, etc instead of being at mercy of the vrs provider. What says?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 111
|
Quote:
The cost of equipment may deter folks from buying specific equipment, and therefore not enable a redirection of the revenue stream from the 800 lb gorilla of the VRS industry to the selling VRS vendor. Lastly, for the masses, "free" trumps anything that costs money up front. This is aptly illustrated by the TIVO dvr situation where most people are not willing to buy a TIVO because of its high up front costs and monthly fees, despite the fact that its way better than, say, a Comcast dvr. The point is that the comcast dvr doesn't cost a customer anything up front. Is that logical to me as a dvr customer? No, since I highly value the TIVO interface, but I'm not a typical consumer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Buckeye State
Posts: 5,419
|
Get info on new CDSVRS's new The Z products.
ZT 150 http://www.edsalert.com/wp-content/u...t150_flyer.pdf ZIP 340 http://www.edsalert.com/wp-content/u...p340_flyer.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,163
|
Zip340 weighs 2 pounds... only bit third less than my laptop. Cool
Hope it goes with an adapter plugging in the car cigarette lighter, too. How heavy does the MVP weigh? I don't think I'm interested in zt150 since vp-200 would be enough probably. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Buckeye State
Posts: 5,419
|
What a disappointment - we were led to believe that these would be a totally new product but actually these have been around for some time - the Z-T150 is actually a repackaged version of Tandberg’s T150 videophone and the Z-IP320 is another repackaged version of Creative InPerson Wi-Fi Videophone, nothing new
Tandberg's T150 videophone http://www.tandberg.com/collateral/d...anual_(L3).pdf. Its really ugly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 181
|
First of all - allow me to say a few things -
I think we as deaf individuals should purchase the video phones. There are too many individuals with a variety of video phones out there - and when you use a specific phone it is directly connected to use their particular vrs. Now if we were to purchase the VP of our choice and therefore it wouldn't necessarily be directly connected to their VRS. (Logically) So basically we pay for the hardware and set it to our preferred VRS. We might like the hardware of one vendor but like the VRS service of another vendor. Plus by doing this - I have heard some individuals who have claimed that VRS would try to come and take their equipment back. If we purchase it - then they can't take it back. But of course if we do the purchase option then they should also have a backing of warranties and etc. And there has been comments from others that I have heard that VRS will provide VP based on your usage with their service. So it sets your priority level. What if you love their service but hate their hardware product and you prefer another brand. Now secondly - to look into CSD Z - Honestly Tandberg is an EXCELLENT product. I have used the Tandberg 1000 product at my office and the quality is wonderful. You really can't go wrong there. And as for the Creative, I havent seen those - but seriously - Sorenson - came from DLINK product that was previously available - they just improved it. OJO - came from OJO - I dont think they were ever really planning to make it a deaf related product until SnapVRS came along and made an offer to partner. CSDVRS - had been using DLINK products in the early days and now they are partnering and pulling out what is available and potentially better than what the current DLINK has to offer. So give them thumbs up for trying to improve the quality. Viable - Give them hands up for coming up with the first product - it is creative and now the rest of the VRS will start following - other VRS can learn from them and move to develop and improve. Competition is good - *I know Im going to get flamed for saying that we should charge for the VP - but the only reason why I say that - is because there are some individuals who have 2-3 diff VP* and there are some who may not have one but they are on a wait list because they are waiting for the supply. So this way it gives everyone an opportunity to own their own VP. *
__________________
Billy |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Good times, good times.
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2
|
Deflord, the original DVC-1000 from D-Link has a chip made specifically by Sorenson. Sorenson was the inventor of the video codec chip. If you open up the i2eye, you will see a chip that says "Sorenson Communications" stamped on the processor.
Sorenson just saw increased revenues and a worthy investment in the deaf community to develop a VP from scratch. The reason why Sorenson dominated the market is because they had millions and millions of dollars to invest from their parent company. All the other VRS providers are companies that started from scratch and as an interpreting company. They are just starting to catch up and reclaim a market that was dominated by monopoly. A good example is HOVRS, which recently merged with GoAmerica, is in second place with 21% of market share. That number is expected to grow once the MVP releases with the industry's truly mobile version. GoAmerica currently provides six, yes six, different relay services that range from HOVRS to i711Relay and contracts with three VRS services such as AT&T VRS, Federal VRS and Sprint Relay. Think of HOVRS as the Apple Macintosh version as compared to Sorenson as the PC product. In final say, D-Link DVC-1000 i2eye was a Sorenson product marketed under D-Link due to their video processor. Sorenson was already a large corporation and thus had the dollars to invest while the other start-up companies did not. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|