culture? disability? impaired - Page 2

deafdyke · 09-15-2005, 04:30 PM

Quote:

It's interesting that the term 'impaired' is considered derogatory here. I've never known anyone in the hearing world who considered it to be a term that degrades the intrinsic value of a human being.

Well what about the term DWI, driving while impaired?

Quote:

I don't understand the point-of-view that all ways of being are equal. I have TS/OCD. My way of being is NOT EQUAL to that of people who don't face a major neurological disfunction. I fight battles that they don't know exist. I struggle to do things that they never give a conscious thought to.

Neurologically, I'm not different but equal. I'm different and impaired. It doesn't change my value as a person. I'm not less of a person. My intellect is not effected. My quality of life and my abilities to handle certain situations are significantly diminished at times.

Well I think that nereologically affected people (by this label I include people with mental disorders, learning disabilties, and mental retardation) are impaired....their disabilty hits at the very core of the soul....but many PHYSICAL disablities don't really affect your day to day life all that much. You CAN learn to adapt to physcial disabilties.

Quote:

I don't understand how, conceptually, this is any different than any other disability. A paraplegic is a paraplegic. They are neurologically impaired. A blind person is a blind person. They are visually impaired. It's simple logic.

I've never heard of a para being called nereologically impaired. That's usually used for mild MR and learning disabilties. And, a lot of blind people object to being called visually impaired....the correct term is low vision.
We object to the term impaired b/c it sounds like we sit in a corner whining that we can't function like a person without a disabilty....it sounds like being disabled is horrible and bad and all that.
Yes, you deal with a lot of stuff that people without nereological involvement do, but so what? Black people do too, so do females, so do GLB folks, so do poor people....so does everyone who doesn't fit the stereotype of The Average White Good Ol' Boy "Normal" average White Suburban Christian Amercain citizien.
I remmy one time overhearing one of my friends who is GLB saying that she had never felt 100% comfortable with straight folks....at the time I wasn't out, but I remember going "Wow....that's how I feel about not fitting in 100% with hearies!"

je_suis_chic · 09-15-2005, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigdaddyb

This is just plain silly. If part of your body doesn't work right, it's a disability. Changing the name doesn't change the nature of any issue, object, or being. Declaring an impairment that effects a small percentage of the population as 'normal' is what's delusional.

The immigrant question is ridiculous. Hearing isn't just about sound. It effects how one perceives the world around them. It's not a language issue.

The real issue here is this. Does disability = inferiority? No. Only a complete moron makes that assumption. I have a disability. My brain doesn't function the way that 99.999999% of everyone else's does. Yep. I'm different. I have great difficulty in accomplishing things that 99.9999999% of the world finds so easy that they seldom think of it. My wife is HOH. It's a disability. My son has Asperger's. It's a disability.

Disability doesn't change the inherant value of the individual. Playing word games to try and feel better about oneself doesn't work and makes the person look foolish to the rest of the world.

If you're not disabled, you don't need special accomodations. Don't cash the checks, don't accept the equipment subsidies and corporate services/discounts. Otherwise, call it what it is and STILL be proud of who you are and what you can accomplish.

In my time here on AD, I've noticed some things. Some in the deaf community put the hearing world in an no-win position. There are threads that discuss the insult paid when the hearing ignore deaf people, or when the hearing make zero effort to communicate with the deaf. On the other hand, there are threads about how pissed some deaf people get when hearies try to communicate with them.

I'm honestly confused. I've seen extremely polar, diametrically opposed opinions come from the same people. I'm not trying to be rude or offensive here. As a hearie, I'm really confused.

brianb

amen!

je_suis_chic · 09-15-2005, 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VamPyroX

still has high pride in her 'ghetto' roots.

lmao!!!!! That was great.

sr171soars · 09-15-2005, 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deafdyke

Well what about the term DWI, driving while impaired?

Not a relevant argument as a DWI is self inflicted (and gradually recedes and goes away) not something one was born with such as being deaf or blind. There are some of people who think being impaired (in the context of hearing) as a offensive word but not most people. I agree with bigdaddyb that the hearing world in general does not think of people with hearing losses are some kind of human of lessor intrinsic value. I also realize are there people out who treat people with any form of disability (for the lack of a better word) like worthless people just because of disgust, fear, have no understanding of the situation, and etc... I make no excuses for them and it should not be.

Quote:

Originally Posted by deafdyke

Yes, you deal with a lot of stuff that people without nereological involvement do, but so what? Black people do too, so do females, so do GLB folks, so do poor people....so does everyone who doesn't fit the stereotype of The Average White Good Ol' Boy "Normal" average White Suburban Christian Amercain citizien.

This is a even more pathetic argument. What does that have to do with the price of eggs? Do you honestly think any society is going to have an easier time integrating people with impairments? It is not something just limited to here. Even within subgroups here there is little tolerance for some differences so it is not just some WASP thing as you like to paint it. It is a universal phenomenon and goes across cultures. How about such people trying to live in China, an Islamic country or any other place and see how these folks fare...not easily I think.

Getting back to the point of this whole thread about the term of "hearing impairment", I can believe there is something such as Deaf culture. But it is predicated on the fact the people who belong to it invariably have a hearing loss which is why they are in it. They feel that is a place where they can be on equal terms with others primarily due to the unique form of communication without spoken words. The issue of feeling a sense of belonging and acceptance is very important to anybody and it is difficult for a deaf person to feel that in normal society. This very fact points out they don't feel equal out in the normal hearing world (not all of them of course but most). Nobody believes that the average person has a "thing" about deaf people or others with different issues and out to do what they can to make them miserable.

People crave conformity across the board and for them dealing with somebody "different" is not easy to do. I think of some of the comments by some here in this forum using the term hearies (almost in a derogratory way) and intolerance toward them if they try to communicate with them especially if they are sincere. Who is being hypocritical here? What goes around comes around... I have been to G college in DC a long time ago when I was a younger man visiting a former teacher (who became an administrator there) I knew when I was a child. I couldn't believe the upturned noses at me because I was not one of them just because I could function as a hearing person with a HA and it was like I was a traitor or something. That left a deep impression about the deaf in my mind for a long time. The bottom line is the fact in the realm of humanity across the entire planet, hearing is a normal attribute and the lack thereof is considered an impairment. Not in the sense lacking equality as human beings but rather lacking in a typical physical ability. I seen too much defensiveness with this whole concept.

I have a hearing loss and it is now to the point I'm totally deaf due to my CI. It is a choice I made and I'm doing very well with it. Still I know the reality is that I have a hearing impairment and *shrugs* why should I care what others think of me. I'm functional and most normal people usually never notice I'm deaf...I'm just stating a fact. I don't run and hide from it but rather I just deal with it each and every day. I grew up in the hearing world and it is not as a bad place some had made it out to be. Yes, you run into clueless and even nasty people sometimes but who amongst us doesn't? It is not limited to the hearing world. I seen enough with the deaf that basically a spade is a spade and people are people the world over.

je_suis_chic · 09-15-2005, 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sr171soars

Not a relevant argument as a DWI is self inflicted (and gradually recedes and goes away) not something one was born with such as being deaf or blind. There are some of people who think being impaired (in the context of hearing) as a offensive word but not most people. I agree with bigdaddyb that the hearing world in general does not think of people with hearing losses are some kind of human of lessor intrinsic value. I also realize are there people out who treat people with any form of disability (for the lack of a better word) like worthless people just because of disgust, fear, have no understanding of the situation, and etc... I make no excuses for them and it should not be.

This is a even more pathetic argument. What does that have to do with the price of eggs? Do you honestly think any society is going to have an easier time integrating people with impairments? It is not something just limited to here. Even within subgroups here there is little tolerance for some differences so it is not just some WASP thing as you like to paint it. It is a universal phenomenon and goes across cultures. How about such people trying to live in China, an Islamic country or any other place and see how these folks fare...not easily I think.

Getting back to the point of this whole thread about the term of "hearing impairment", I can believe there is something such as Deaf culture. But it is predicated on the fact the people who belong to it invariably have a hearing loss which is why they are in it. They feel that is a place where they can be on equal terms with others primarily due to the unique form of communication without spoken words. The issue of feeling a sense of belonging and acceptance is very important to anybody and it is difficult for a deaf person to feel that in normal society. This very fact points out they don't feel equal out in the normal hearing world (not all of them of course but most). Nobody believes that the average person has a "thing" about deaf people or others with different issues and out to do what they can to make them miserable.

People crave conformity across the board and for them dealing with somebody "different" is not easy to do. I think of some of the comments by some here in this forum using the term hearies (almost in a derogratory way) and intolerance toward them if they try to communicate with them especially if they are sincere. Who is being hypocritical here? What goes around comes around... I have been to G college in DC a long time ago when I was a younger man visiting a former teacher (who became an administrator there) I knew when I was a child. I couldn't believe the upturned noses at me because I was not one of them just because I could function as a hearing person with a HA and it was like I was a traitor or something. That left a deep impression about the deaf in my mind for a long time. The bottom line is the fact in the realm of humanity across the entire planet, hearing is a normal attribute and the lack thereof is considered an impairment. Not in the sense lacking equality as human beings but rather lacking in a typical physical ability. I seen too much defensiveness with this whole concept.

I have a hearing loss and it is now to the point I'm totally deaf due to my CI. It is a choice I made and I'm doing very well with it. Still I know the reality is that I have a hearing impairment and *shrugs* why should I care what others think of me. I'm functional and most normal people usually never notice I'm deaf...I'm just stating a fact. I don't run and hide from it but rather I just deal with it each and every day. I grew up in the hearing world and it is not as a bad place some had made it out to be. Yes, you run into clueless and even nasty people sometimes but who amongst us doesn't? It is not limited to the hearing world. I seen enough with the deaf that basically a spade is a spade and people are people the world over.

you have WAY too much time on your hands....

sr171soars · 09-15-2005, 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by je_suis_chic

you have WAY too much time on your hands....

Er...normally I don't but this got my goat a little...

You won't see me do this often.

deafdyke · 09-15-2005, 08:57 PM

Quote:

This is a even more pathetic argument. What does that have to do with the price of eggs? Do you honestly think any society is going to have an easier time integrating people with impairments? It is not something just limited to here. Even within subgroups here there is little tolerance for some differences so it is not just some WASP thing as you like to paint it. It is a universal phenomenon and goes across cultures. How about such people trying to live in China, an Islamic country or any other place and see how these folks fare...not easily I think.

I never said that it was a WASP thing. That was an EXAMPLE, b/c a WASP type is the MAJORITY in our country!
I am aware that it's a cross cultral thing....but the thing is....that virtually ALL the stuff that we who have disabilties is experianced by other minorites...it is a MINORITY experiance, not nessarily an experiance from not being able to walk/see/hear/talk.

Quote:

Getting back to the point of this whole thread about the term of "hearing impairment", I can believe there is something such as Deaf culture. But it is predicated on the fact the people who belong to it invariably have a hearing loss which is why they are in it.

Not all people who are Deaf, are deaf or even hard of hearing....there are some unilateral loss folks who ID as Deaf, and there are hearies with other disabilties who ID as Deaf b/c they use ASL/Sign as a primary language!

sr171soars · 09-15-2005, 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deafdyke

I never said that it was a WASP thing. That was an EXAMPLE, b/c a WASP type is the MAJORITY in our country!
I am aware that it's a cross cultral thing....but the thing is....that virtually ALL the stuff that we who have disabilties is experianced by other minorites...it is a MINORITY experiance, not nessarily an experiance from not being able to walk/see/hear/talk.

Not all people who are Deaf, are deaf or even hard of hearing....there are some unilateral loss folks who ID as Deaf, and there are hearies with other disabilties who ID as Deaf b/c they use ASL/Sign as a primary language!

I understand your first point and there is truth to that. However it was in the way you setup your argument that it appeared you were blameshifting the problems. Of course the majority wouldn't understand what we have to deal with and I wouldn't expect them to either. *Sigh* it ain't a perfect world...

I can see your second point on who might belong in the deaf world. Learn something everyday... But my point why there would be a deaf culture/subgroup whatever still stands...

Reba · 09-15-2005, 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Teresh

Yes I am. Braille is set of marks which are a method of expressing several languages, including English. It is not a language unto itself but instead a writing system which is used to express one on paper.

From dictionary.com:

Braille (n.) - A system of writing and printing for blind or visually impaired people, in which varied arrangements of raised dots representing letters and numerals are identified by touch.

I don't see the word 'language' in there at all. But just to be doubly sure, I've consulted Wikipedia as well.

According to Wikipedia:
"Braille is a tactile writing system used by blind people. It was invented by Louis Braille of France who was blinded in a childhood accident. At the age of 15 he modified a failed military system for reading orders at night without showing any light (night writing), inventing Braille."

Braille is not a language, as multiple languages (English being one of many) can be rendered in it. Any language that uses the latin alphabet (ie English, French, Spanish, Portugese, Finnish, Swedish, German, Norwegian, Polish, Italian, etc.) can be rendered in braille, just as they can be rendered in the latin alphabet. Surely you're not going to allege that the alphabet is a language? It is a collection of symbols, which when combined with numerals and punctuation produce a written means of the rendering of a particular language. Braille is the same, the only difference being that its intent is to be tactile rather than visual.

Same idea for Morse Code, semiphore flags, and ship-to-ship signal lights; all representations of the alphabet but not languages.

Reba · 09-15-2005, 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by je_suis_chic

I would call ASL a forum of english. It does have a different sentence structure and things, however; it is englsh.... hence "american" sign language.

ASL is not English. It is called "American" sign language because it is used by American Deaf people.

deafdyke · 09-15-2005, 11:21 PM

if it was English then Signers would not have difficulties with English....but research indciates that Signing Deaf people approach English as a SECOND language....ala the people who speak Spanish/French etc as a first language!

dkf747 · 09-16-2005, 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sr171soars

But my point why there would be a deaf culture/subgroup whatever still stands...

What point? I went back to the long post above and didn't see one. I saw a complaint about upturned noses and how that left a lasting impression about Deaf people. (A one-sided view, of course). I must have missed the point. Could you restate?

sr171soars · 09-16-2005, 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dkf747

What point? I went back to the long post above and didn't see one. I saw a complaint about upturned noses and how that left a lasting impression about Deaf people. (A one-sided view, of course). I must have missed the point. Could you restate?

It is this paragraph...
{Getting back to the point of this whole thread about the term of "hearing impairment", I can believe there is something such as Deaf culture. But it is predicated on the fact the people who belong to it invariably have a hearing loss which is why they are in it. They feel that is a place where they can be on equal terms with others primarily due to the unique form of communication without spoken words. The issue of feeling a sense of belonging and acceptance is very important to anybody and it is difficult for a deaf person to feel that in normal society. This very fact points out they don't feel equal out in the normal hearing world (not all of them of course but most). Nobody believes that the average person has a "thing" about deaf people or others with different issues and out to do what they can to make them miserable. }

Deafdyke pointed out that it includes others as follows...[It includes others as Not all people who are Deaf, are deaf or even hard of hearing....there are some unilateral loss folks who ID as Deaf, and there are hearies with other disabilties who ID as Deaf b/c they use ASL/Sign as a primary language!]

My point it doesn't really matter who is in the Deaf culture. They are in it because they aren't comfortable being in the hearing world. See my own cut&pasted paragraph above...

Hope that helps.

je_suis_chic · 09-16-2005, 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reba

ASL is not English. It is called "American" sign language because it is used by American Deaf people.

yeah, right. each word in asl means something in english.

deafdyke · 09-16-2005, 05:21 PM

yeah, so? Each word in French, Spanish, Esperanto, Japanese, Karen, !Kung, Farsi, and Pig Latin means something in English....that doesn't make them English!

09-16-2005, 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by je_suis_chic

yeah, right. each word in asl means something in english.

No, signs do not represent specific, individual words, but more of ideas and concepts. Do a little background reading on ASL and you'll find this out quickly.

je_suis_chic · 09-16-2005, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cental34

No, signs do not represent specific, individual words, but more of ideas and concepts. Do a little background reading on ASL and you'll find this out quickly.

not really. The thing is, every word in the english language represents ideas or concepts, it's the word. not the sign.

and thanks everyone! I'm getting exactly what i wanted out of this topic!

Reba · 09-16-2005, 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by je_suis_chic

yeah, right. each word in asl means something in english.

Each sign in ASL represents a concept, which may translate into several different English words or phrases.

Or, several English words can be conveyed with one ASL sign.

There is no word-sign pairing in ASL and English. There are English glosses which can be used to identify the general concept of a sign but those are not translations of signs.

je_suis_chic · 09-16-2005, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reba

Each sign in ASL represents a concept, which may translate into several different English words or phrases.

Or, several English words can be conveyed with one ASL sign.

There is no word-sign pairing in ASL and English. There are English glosses which can be used to identify the general concept of a sign but those are not translations of signs.

lmao! But there is! lets take the color pick for example. just because it's my favorite. The sign for pink, being the P brushing on the chin, means Pink. what kind of "concept" is there to get?

09-16-2005, 08:42 PM

I really think you're missing the point. In spoken languages words translates directly to other words. This is not the case with ASL. As Reba explained, several English words can be summed up in one sign. Such as "I Love You" is one single sign. Take a look and you'll see ASL is, in fact, not a derivative of English.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_sign_language

09-16-2005, 08:42 PM

I really think you're missing the point. In spoken languages, words translates directly to other words. This is not the case with ASL. As Reba explained, several English words can be summed up in one sign. Such as "I Love You" is one single sign. Take a look and you'll see ASL is, in fact, not a derivative of English.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_sign_language

Teresh · 09-16-2005, 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by je_suis_chic

yeah, right. each word in asl means something in english.

Each *sign* in ASL represents a particular idea, which is all any word in any language is. What makes languages different is grammar and syntax and sometimes the ways in which the language is rendered.

Quote:

Originally Posted by je_suis_chic

and thanks everyone! I'm getting exactly what i wanted out of this topic!

Well that's because you're an hearie troll.

rjr2006 · 09-17-2005, 09:34 PM

well. I am deaf and mobility impared and I am living with hearing people. I am happy for who I am and I accept my disabilities. deaf people should act friendly towards hearing people instead of being rude to hearing people. I want to be with deaf people, but there are other times, that I would be with hearing people for the rest of my life. . life is not easy for everybody.

Today
Deafness	Sponsored Links __________________ This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com

09-15-2005, 11:21 PM	#41 (permalink)
deafdyke So NOT a Princess! Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Trebekistan Posts: 6,420	if it was English then Signers would not have difficulties with English....but research indciates that Signing Deaf people approach English as a SECOND language....ala the people who speak Spanish/French etc as a first language!

09-16-2005, 05:21 PM	#45 (permalink)
deafdyke So NOT a Princess! Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Trebekistan Posts: 6,420	yeah, so? Each word in French, Spanish, Esperanto, Japanese, Karen, !Kung, Farsi, and Pig Latin means something in English....that doesn't make them English!

09-16-2005, 08:42 PM	#50 (permalink)
apathrev Guest Posts: n/a	I really think you're missing the point. In spoken languages words translates directly to other words. This is not the case with ASL. As Reba explained, several English words can be summed up in one sign. Such as "I Love You" is one single sign. Take a look and you'll see ASL is, in fact, not a derivative of English. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_sign_language

09-16-2005, 08:42 PM	#51 (permalink)
apathrev Guest Posts: n/a	I really think you're missing the point. In spoken languages, words translates directly to other words. This is not the case with ASL. As Reba explained, several English words can be summed up in one sign. Such as "I Love You" is one single sign. Take a look and you'll see ASL is, in fact, not a derivative of English. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_sign_language

09-17-2005, 09:34 PM	#53 (permalink)
rjr2006 RJR2K6 Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Soon moving to Rochy Posts: 1,821	well. I am deaf and mobility impared and I am living with hearing people. I am happy for who I am and I accept my disabilities. deaf people should act friendly towards hearing people instead of being rude to hearing people. I want to be with deaf people, but there are other times, that I would be with hearing people for the rest of my life. . life is not easy for everybody.