Back to the future Trilogy - Page 2

JClarke · 10-11-2007, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dixie

uh Jake - your pics are anti-piracy pics.

What does stealing bandwidth have to do with our movie?

Anyway back to the movie - how could the current audience NOT find something they can connect with the movie. We all have times and moments in our lives where we wish we could go back and change them, and change how the future has come.

Who cares if it was made in the 80s? Im getting into the 80s thing myself listening to Crush (1980 Me) blaring over the stereo. If you think about the 80s were cool. Minus the big hair and rolled up cuff on your pants or those Hammer pants, lol.

I know, I didn't even realise it was a pricay, damn them, but doesn't matter, I got them replaced now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dixie

As for facts I do know the Time Machine was a DeLorean.

Yes, but there is more facts, you should know of.

Dixie · 10-11-2007, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jclarke

Second question: Ask yourself a question, about this image.

Also, what are the facts of the trilogy?

Why is the hour hand pointing at Marty's dick and the minute hand pointing at Docs head?

Sorry goofy moment.

But seriously - Why does everything in the movie have to correspond with the numbers 8 and 5?

Think about it: 1885 8:05 1955 8:05 1985 8:05 2025 8:05 are we seeing a pattern here? Seems like someone was OCD in the production crew.

JClarke · 10-11-2007, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dixie

It says Im not getting it?

are you referring to the second image?

JClarke · 10-11-2007, 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dixie

.

But seriously - Why does everything in the movie have to correspond with the numbers 8 and 5?

Think about it: 1885 8:05 1955 8:05 1985 8:05 2025 8:05 are we seeing a pattern here? Seems like someone was OCD in the production crew.

It should be 2015, to correct you.

But Dixie, that's a good question there. And also, my question is that - why did the same photo appear on the second movie? In one of the library books?

Dixie · 10-11-2007, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jclarke

are you referring to the second image?

no, the first one says IMPAWARDS.COM vertically.

Dixie · 10-11-2007, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jclarke

It should be 2015, to correct you.

But Dixie, that's a good question there. And also, my question is that - why did the same photo appear on the second movie? In one of the library books?

Because theoretically Doc had already gone back in time and changed the future without realizing he would find himself a century later.

JClarke · 10-11-2007, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dixie

no, the first one says IMPAWARDS.COM vertically.

That is the BBTF III poster, I have got it replaced now, it is now shown in the first page.

J'explique · 10-11-2007, 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dixie

Why is the hour hand pointing at Marty's dick and the minute hand pointing at Docs head?

Sorry goofy moment.

But seriously - Why does everything in the movie have to correspond with the numbers 8 and 5?

Think about it: 1885 8:05 1955 8:05 1985 8:05 2025 8:05 are we seeing a pattern here? Seems like someone was OCD in the production crew.

The movie was first produced in 1985. Going back to 1955, that's 30 years. Going forward 30 years, that would be 2015. 100 years earlier like BTTF III in 1885.

Dixie · 10-11-2007, 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jclarke

That is the BBTF III poster, I have got it replaced now, it is now shown in the first page.

It still says IMPAWARDS.COM here mate. Which movie poster are you referring to? I can google it up.

J'explique · 10-11-2007, 08:17 PM

Ditto here ^

JClarke · 10-11-2007, 08:21 PM

Hmm, interesting! let me fix it first, if not. The Image is SUPPOSED to be Back to the Future Movie poster

JClarke · 10-11-2007, 08:23 PM

First image per attached.

Dixie · 10-11-2007, 08:28 PM

First of all it looks like MArtys foot is on fire.

Secondly - why did Doc let them go that far back know the technology that can get them back to the future would have not been invented until after WWII?? I think Doc had bigger plans when he 'accidentally' zapped himself back. But of course Marty comes to the rescue to save Doc from his genuis and his stupidity all the same.

Dixie · 10-11-2007, 08:29 PM

and it looks like your image got unattached

JClarke · 10-11-2007, 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dixie

First of all it looks like MArtys foot is on fire.

Secondly - why did Doc let them go that far back know the technology that can get them back to the future would have not been invented until after WWII?? I think Doc had bigger plans when he 'accidentally' zapped himself back. But of course Marty comes to the rescue to save Doc from his genuis and his stupidity all the same.

What do you mean 'unattched'?

It doesn't matter if Marty's on fire. But your second opinion is a good point to speak of. DId you ever notice something on the third instalment, in one scene that when Doc was telling Marty how far the train track was long enough on the map at the station? Ok, in that scene, did you notice anything in the background?

Dixie · 10-11-2007, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jclarke

What do you mean 'unattched'?

It doesn't matter if Marty's on fire. But your second opinion is a good point to speak of. DId you ever notice something on the third instalment, in one scene that when Doc was telling Marty how far the train track was long enough on the map at the station? Ok, in that scene, did you notice anything in the background?

There for a moment your attached image wasnt showing up even after the page completed loading from here, but I hit refresh for new replies and now it shows up.
As for the train tracks he said it had to be longer due to more time needed to build up speed for the time machine to work. As for the background it either looks like a gun or the top of Biff's cane orrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

It could be unintentional porn???

JClarke · 10-11-2007, 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dixie

There for a moment your attached image wasnt showing up even after the page completed loading from here, but I hit refresh for new replies and now it shows up.
As for the train tracks he said it had to be longer due to more time needed to build up speed for the time machine to work. As for the background it either looks like a gun or the top of Biff's cane orrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

It could be unintentional porn???

Nope, you suspected it wrong. When the two gentleman was at the station viewing the large map - did you notice Doc's future to be wife, waiting to be picked up, Doc was the one who should pick her up? She was wearing a purple 'old-fashioned' dress.

J'explique · 10-11-2007, 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jclarke

What do you mean 'unattched'?

It doesn't matter if Marty's on fire. But your second opinion is a good point to speak of. DId you ever notice something on the third instalment, in one scene that when Doc was telling Marty how far the train track was long enough on the map at the station? Ok, in that scene, did you notice anything in the background?

A windmill?

Dixie · 10-11-2007, 10:18 PM

Ah now you mention it, yes I did notice it but didnt give it much thought, lol

BTW thats Mary Steenburgen and she grew up not far from here in North Little Rock. And yes she still comes 'home' from time to time but I have yet to see her out on the street in plainclothes, or better yet I have not recognized her in plainclothes which is likely her goal.

JClarke · 10-11-2007, 10:18 PM

Nope, and you missed the post, that I just told you what was it!

Unfortuantely, it is not a windmill.

JClarke · 10-11-2007, 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dixie

Ah now you mention it, yes I did notice it but didnt give it much thought, lol

BTW thats Mary Steenburgen and she grew up not far from here in North Little Rock. And yes she still comes 'home' from time to time but I have yet to see her out on the street in plainclothes, or better yet I have not recognized her in plainclothes which is likely her goal.

Did Doc ever mention about the lady? not much so, it means to show that Doc has forgotten her!

J'explique · 10-11-2007, 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jclarke

Nope, and you missed the post, that I just told you what was it!

Unfortuantely, it is not a windmill.

I don't want to read all the posts in this thread.

JClarke · 10-11-2007, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J'explique

I don't want to read all the posts in this thread.

Why bother?

J'explique · 10-11-2007, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jclarke

Why bother?

Well, once I was posting something in this thread, and then I went out for a while. Not on the computer, but doing something around the house for a few hours and then came back. I lost the track, so I was bit confused and lost.

Dixie · 10-11-2007, 10:32 PM

Now that you mention it, you'e right. It is obvious I have not watched the third installment enough to know the little things like that. Looks like it may be time to order the Trilogy from Amazon.com.

Jake,
I hate to cut this short mate but it is 9:30 pm here and I have to get Maddie a bath and get to bed. I dont mean to be rude, but I do need to log off and get things done. I will pick up the conversation again tomorrow afternoon when I get off work, alrighty mate?

10-11-2007, 08:21 PM	#41 (permalink)
JClarke AD addict Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 14,139 Blog Entries: 4	Hmm, interesting! let me fix it first, if not. The Image is SUPPOSED to be Back to the Future Movie poster __________________ This is not a ASL version

10-11-2007, 08:28 PM	#43 (permalink)
Dixie Hooray its November! Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Arkansas Posts: 4,202	First of all it looks like MArtys foot is on fire. Secondly - why did Doc let them go that far back know the technology that can get them back to the future would have not been invented until after WWII?? I think Doc had bigger plans when he 'accidentally' zapped himself back. But of course Marty comes to the rescue to save Doc from his genuis and his stupidity all the same. __________________ Visit my Deaf Blog Signature banner created by me, please do not steal!

10-11-2007, 08:29 PM	#44 (permalink)
Dixie Hooray its November! Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Arkansas Posts: 4,202	and it looks like your image got unattached __________________ Visit my Deaf Blog Signature banner created by me, please do not steal!

10-11-2007, 10:18 PM	#49 (permalink)
Dixie Hooray its November! Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Arkansas Posts: 4,202	Ah now you mention it, yes I did notice it but didnt give it much thought, lol BTW thats Mary Steenburgen and she grew up not far from here in North Little Rock. And yes she still comes 'home' from time to time but I have yet to see her out on the street in plainclothes, or better yet I have not recognized her in plainclothes which is likely her goal. __________________ Visit my Deaf Blog Signature banner created by me, please do not steal!

10-11-2007, 10:18 PM	#50 (permalink)
JClarke AD addict Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 14,139 Blog Entries: 4	Nope, and you missed the post, that I just told you what was it! Unfortuantely, it is not a windmill. __________________ This is not a ASL version

Today
Deafness	Sponsored Links __________________ This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com

10-11-2007, 08:17 PM	#40 (permalink)
J'explique Registered User Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 289	Ditto here ^

10-11-2007, 10:32 PM	#55 (permalink)
Dixie Hooray its November! Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Arkansas Posts: 4,202	Now that you mention it, you'e right. It is obvious I have not watched the third installment enough to know the little things like that. Looks like it may be time to order the Trilogy from Amazon.com. Jake, I hate to cut this short mate but it is 9:30 pm here and I have to get Maddie a bath and get to bed. I dont mean to be rude, but I do need to log off and get things done. I will pick up the conversation again tomorrow afternoon when I get off work, alrighty mate? __________________ Visit my Deaf Blog Signature banner created by me, please do not steal!