Hopkins to pay $190M after doc taped pelvic exams

rockin'robin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
24,433
Reaction score
544
BALTIMORE (AP) — A gynecologist who secretly used a pen-like camera to record hundreds of videos and photos of his patients' sex organs during pelvic exams will cost one of the world's most prestigious medical centers $190 million in a settlement with more than 8,000 women.

Dr. Nikita Levy was fired in February 2013, days after a co-worker alerted authorities at Johns Hopkins Health System about her suspicions. He was forced to turn over the camera, and committed suicide days later. Investigators discovered roughly 1,200 videos and 140 images stored on a series of servers in his home.
"All of these women were brutalized by this," said the women's lead attorney, Jonathan Schochor. "Some of these women needed counseling, they were sleepless, they were dysfunctional in the workplace, they were dysfunctional at home, they were dysfunctional with their mates. This breach of trust, this betrayal — this is how they felt."
The preliminary settlement approved by a judge Monday is one of the largest on record in the U.S. involving sexual misconduct by a physician. It all but closes a case that never produced criminal charges but seriously threatened Hopkins' reputation.
Lawyers said thousands of women were traumatized, even though their faces were not visible in the images and it could not be established with certainty which patients were recorded or how many.

Hopkins said insurance will cover the settlement, which "properly balances the concerns of thousands of plaintiffs with obligations the Health System has to provide ongoing and superior care to the community." "It is our hope that this settlement_and findings by law enforcement that images were not shared_helps those affected achieve a measure of closure," the hospital statement said, adding that "one individual does not define Johns Hopkins."
Hospital authorities called Baltimore police just before Levy's firing. Police and federal investigators said they found no evidence he shared the material with others.
A class-action lawsuit on behalf of more than 8,000 of his patients who contacted lawyers was brought against Johns Hopkins last fall, alleging the hospital should have known what he was up to.
Some women told of being inappropriately touched and verbally abused by Levy, according to Schochor. In some cases, women said they were regularly summoned to Levy's office for unnecessary pelvic exams.

Myra James, 67, had been going to him for annual exams for 20 years. Since his misconduct became public, she hasn't been to a gynecologist once.
"I can't bring myself to go back," James said. "You're lying there, exposed. It's violating and it's horrible, and my trust is gone. Period."
The AP normally does not identify possible victims of sex crimes, but James agreed to the use of her name.
The settlement, involving eight law firms, is subject to final approval by a judge. A forensic psychologist and a post-traumatic stress specialist interviewed the plaintiffs and placed each woman into a category based on trauma level. That will determine how much money each one will receive.

Hopkins issued a statement in October saying it was working to settle the claims in a way that "helps our patients and colleagues move forward."
Levy, 54, graduated from the Weill Cornell Medical College in Manhattan, and completed his internship and residency at Kings County Hospital Center. He began working at Hopkins in 1988. When the allegations came to light, he was working at Hopkins East Baltimore Medical Center, a community practice affiliated with Johns Hopkins Hospital. During his 25-year tenure, he saw roughly 12,600 patients.
Schochor said there is no way to identify which patients were recorded without having them "sit around a table and try to identify sexual organs without pictures of faces," something the lawyer said would be impossible and could cause the women more distress.

His suicide — by wrapping his head in a plastic bag with a hose connected to a helium tank — frustrated everyone who wanted to know his motives and see him face justice.
Hopkins sent out letters to his entire patient list last year apologizing to the women and urging them to seek care with other Hopkins specialists.
But hundreds were so traumatized that they "dropped out of the medical system," and some even stopped sending their children to doctors, Schochor said.
James said her dealings with Levy were always unsettling. She said she found it strange that he conducted examinations without a nurse present.
"He was cold, and I was kind of scared of him. His bedside manner — he didn't have any," she said. "But all my doctors were at Hopkins. I've had two surgeries there, my primary doctor is there. I was used to going there for everything."


_h353_w628_m6_otrue_lfalse.jpg


Hopkins to pay $190M after doc taped pelvic exams
 
It is allele over the news here in MD.
 
I have no idea what pelvic exam looks like, does it have to put patient to sleep during exam ?

He performed pelvic exams without a nurse during 1988 to 2013? I think patient should (is responsible?) request a nurse or another Doctor to be next to him during the pelvic or gyn exam.
 
I have no idea what pelvic exam looks like, does it have to put patient to sleep during exam ?

He performed pelvic exams without a nurse during 1988 to 2013? I think patient should (is responsible?) request a nurse or another Doctor to be next to him during the pelvic or gyn exam.

No they don't have to be put to sleep its an examination of the females lower private parts. May be uncomfortable but nothing invasive.

A nurse or assistant is suppose to be present for that type of thing in order to prevent frivolous lawsuits by patients and unethical behavior by the dr which is the case here.
 
frivolous lawsuit alright, greedy women, why can't it just be reprimanding that doctor in interest, fix policy, and pay out as 'free visits for examinations' fical envelopes is just tooo....difficult to justify,....like to me, that's not true justice, its just opportunity to milk $$$ , its pathetic
 
now men should try sue for similar amount on rectal examination (for prostate cancer) and saying its invasive.....

it'd be chucked out as hilariously or deliriously stupid...so like wtf...but how law sees it, as 'appeasement' or such wise....
 
I have no idea what pelvic exam looks like, does it have to put patient to sleep during exam ?

He performed pelvic exams without a nurse during 1988 to 2013? I think patient should (is responsible?) request a nurse or another Doctor to be next to him during the pelvic or gyn exam.

no. being put to sleep is not needed. for women - pelvic exam is same as gyn exam plus more.
 
frivolous lawsuit alright, greedy women

now men should try sue for similar amount on rectal examination (for prostate cancer) and saying its invasive.....

it'd be chucked out as hilariously or deliriously stupid...so like wtf...but how law sees it, as 'appeasement' or such wise....

but.... this is about a gynecologist who secretly used a pen-like camera to record women's privates. that is very violating to women. how would you feel you were put to sleep and a doctor secretly recorded a video of him "molesting" your private?
 
Grummer, also there were reports of him sharing the images he took with other people. I can imagine that some of these photos or videos went viral. If someone did that to me, u bet I will sue.
 
No they don't have to be put to sleep its an examination of the females lower private parts. May be uncomfortable but nothing invasive.

A nurse or assistant is suppose to be present for that type of thing in order to prevent frivolous lawsuits by patients and unethical behavior by the dr which is the case here.

Pelvic Exam for Women: What Happens, Why It's Done

I call this very invasive and that is why most doctors had a woman nurse in the room at the same time. Some women are too trusting of their doctors and do not question anything they do.
 
I've always had a nurse present with the doctor during my pelvic exams, even when it's a woman doctor. That's their policy.

Lawyers get ⅓ of that judgment, and then the rest is divided amongst 8,000+ women, so that's less than $16,000 each.
 
WHAT, Lawyers get a 1/3 of the payout?P!! WTF that is just WRONG TOO
 
frivolous lawsuit alright, greedy women, why can't it just be reprimanding that doctor in interest, fix policy, and pay out as 'free visits for examinations' fical envelopes is just tooo....difficult to justify,....like to me, that's not true justice, its just opportunity to milk $$$ , its pathetic

:hmm:........:shock:......:mad::mad:...say what Grummer?
 
now men should try sue for similar amount on rectal examination (for prostate cancer) and saying its invasive.....

it'd be chucked out as hilariously or deliriously stupid...so like wtf...but how law sees it, as 'appeasement' or such wise....

Yeah if their doctor where secretly taken photos with pen that had a camera in men should sue too. This not about about getting a pelvic exam , it about having photos taken while women get one.
 
Why do you think this doctor committed suicide?...He knew it was wrong! He got caught...We women have to have pelvic exams every year...checking for cancer, STD's, infection... even pregnancy....list goes on and on....it's done within the privacy of the doctor's office along with a nurse in attendance....No way in hell would I want a doctor filming my privates!!!....They are private.

I would have sued too....an invasion of my privacy, and would make me think twice before trusting another OB/GN.....it's outregeous.
 
WHAT, Lawyers get a 1/3 of the payout?P!! WTF that is just WRONG TOO
Well, it's the usual agreement for taking on cases as a contingency service. The lawyers do all the work, and they take the risk that they might not get anything.

They might be getting a different percentage but ⅓ is the standard amount.
 
One thing that puzzles me--how did this doctor get away with doing pelvic exams without a nurse present? None of the patients questioned that? None of the nurses questioned that?
 
Back
Top