AllDeaf.com
Mobile - Perks - Store - Advertise - Spy  

Go Back   AllDeaf.com > Deaf Interests > Hearing Aids & Cochlear Implants
LIKE AllDeaf on Facebook FOLLOW AllDeaf on Twitter
  
Reply
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 02-19-2008, 10:17 AM   #361 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
I will look for the link to the research I referenced. Sorry about the delay...I've had a hectic couple of days and haven't been on line much. The book sounds like a good resource, too. I haven't read it, but will certainly add it to my list.

I think that one thing that keeps getting overlooked in these discussions is that speech therapy is an adjunct service, not a part of the academic curriculum. Just because the curriculum is taught in an oral manner does not imply that speech therapy is a part of the academic curriculum. When we speak of education, we are referring to academic curriculum. Delivering classroom material in an oral mode of language does not mean that lessons in speech are inherent. Additionally, a classroom is a receptive environment. What we need to be concerned with is not how well a child can speak, but how well they are able to receive information in the classroom from an oral base. The level of speaking skill is not necessarily correlated to the level of reception skill. Being able to speak well does not improve academic functioning. Being able to receive and comprehend the information being presented is the key to improved academic functioning. The teacher's job is to get the information in, not to provide speech therapy.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Deafness

Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com
   
Unread 02-19-2008, 10:42 AM   #362 (permalink)
Registered User
 
doubletrouble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
I will look for the link to the research I referenced. Sorry about the delay...I've had a hectic couple of days and haven't been on line much. The book sounds like a good resource, too. I haven't read it, but will certainly add it to my list.

I think that one thing that keeps getting overlooked in these discussions is that speech therapy is an adjunct service, not a part of the academic curriculum. Just because the curriculum is taught in an oral manner does not imply that speech therapy is a part of the academic curriculum. When we speak of education, we are referring to academic curriculum. Delivering classroom material in an oral mode of language does not mean that lessons in speech are inherent. Additionally, a classroom is a receptive environment. What we need to be concerned with is not how well a child can speak, but how well they are able to receive information in the classroom from an oral base. The level of speaking skill is not necessarily correlated to the level of reception skill. Being able to speak well does not improve academic functioning. Being able to receive and comprehend the information being presented is the key to improved academic functioning. The teacher's job is to get the information in, not to provide speech therapy.
While this may be true for some, I know that personally, my son's speech services are really language services. THere is no focus on his speech at all- only language and his comprehension ....My private speech therapist as well as the school therapist work in coordination with the teacher and her lessons. Any words that are abstract, they will review with my son and find him concrete examples ...To us, it's a safety net if he misses something, and the TOD doesn't catch it... we have this... My son has not received "speech" since he was 5 years old.. no need.. now it's our focus on his language and his comprehension of it.
doubletrouble is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-19-2008, 11:00 AM   #363 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by doubletrouble View Post
While this may be true for some, I know that personally, my son's speech services are really language services. THere is no focus on his speech at all- only language and his comprehension ....My private speech therapist as well as the school therapist work in coordination with the teacher and her lessons. Any words that are abstract, they will review with my son and find him concrete examples ...To us, it's a safety net if he misses something, and the TOD doesn't catch it... we have this... My son has not received "speech" since he was 5 years old.. no need.. now it's our focus on his language and his comprehension of it.
That is more of a whole language approach, and one that is much more beneficial than speech therapy. I wonder, though, how much more beneficial it would be to focus on a whole language approach even prior to those children reaching school age, rather than a speech skills approach birth -5, and language after age 5. This is where the gaps seem to lie.

Likewise, if information was being presented in a conceptual manner in the classroom, would the remedical vocab work really be necessary?

Not arguing...simply asking for your views.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-19-2008, 12:41 PM   #364 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by flip View Post
Whatever that is, that sounds creative, let's hope advanced bionics don't read those threads Hope that does not involve implanting babies before they are born?
Unfortuantely, that is exactly what it would involve.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-19-2008, 04:43 PM   #365 (permalink)
Let It Snow!!!!
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: A place where crabs are popular
Posts: 40,307
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
I will look for the link to the research I referenced. Sorry about the delay...I've had a hectic couple of days and haven't been on line much. The book sounds like a good resource, too. I haven't read it, but will certainly add it to my list.

I think that one thing that keeps getting overlooked in these discussions is that speech therapy is an adjunct service, not a part of the academic curriculum. Just because the curriculum is taught in an oral manner does not imply that speech therapy is a part of the academic curriculum. When we speak of education, we are referring to academic curriculum. Delivering classroom material in an oral mode of language does not mean that lessons in speech are inherent. Additionally, a classroom is a receptive environment. What we need to be concerned with is not how well a child can speak, but how well they are able to receive information in the classroom from an oral base. The level of speaking skill is not necessarily correlated to the level of reception skill. Being able to speak well does not improve academic functioning. Being able to receive and comprehend the information being presented is the key to improved academic functioning. The teacher's job is to get the information in, not to provide speech therapy.
I agree but unfortunately my oral deaf ed teachers, regular ed teachers, audis and speech therapists took my good speech as a sign of having the ability to understand what is being said around me most of the time. It was the total opposite. I spent so much time counting the patterns on the ceiling and on the walls during class. Heck, I even memorized all the Presidents in my History class. What a great lesson I learned throughout the whole year, huh?
__________________
"Wine improves with age. The older I get, the better I like it."

--- Anonymous
shel90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-19-2008, 08:42 PM   #366 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by doubletrouble View Post
While this may be true for some, I know that personally, my son's speech services are really language services. THere is no focus on his speech at all- only language and his comprehension ....My private speech therapist as well as the school therapist work in coordination with the teacher and her lessons. Any words that are abstract, they will review with my son and find him concrete examples ...To us, it's a safety net if he misses something, and the TOD doesn't catch it... we have this... My son has not received "speech" since he was 5 years old.. no need.. now it's our focus on his language and his comprehension of it.
You are right people keep talking speech therapy. My children stop receiving speech therapy in school when they were kindergarten. The way I learned about the type of program you have going for your son is the top down. You only need a speech therapist when you are correcting an arti issue but with a lot CI kids you do not need to go this route.
jackiesolorzano is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-19-2008, 09:28 PM   #367 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
I agree but unfortunately my oral deaf ed teachers, regular ed teachers, audis and speech therapists took my good speech as a sign of having the ability to understand what is being said around me most of the time. It was the total opposite. I spent so much time counting the patterns on the ceiling and on the walls during class. Heck, I even memorized all the Presidents in my History class. What a great lesson I learned throughout the whole year, huh?
Your story could be repeated by untold nuimbers of deaf children restricted to an oral only environment. In fact, it has been, on this forum alone.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-19-2008, 09:29 PM   #368 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackiesolorzano View Post
You are right people keep talking speech therapy. My children stop receiving speech therapy in school when they were kindergarten. The way I learned about the type of program you have going for your son is the top down. You only need a speech therapist when you are correcting an arti issue but with a lot CI kids you do not need to go this route.
So, CI kids develop perfect articulation just as the result of being implanted? And perfect articulation is equal to perfect comprehension? And if so, why is remedial work necessary?
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-20-2008, 01:34 AM   #369 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,848
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackiesolorzano View Post
You are right people keep talking speech therapy. My children stop receiving speech therapy in school when they were kindergarten. The way I learned about the type of program you have going for your son is the top down. You only need a speech therapist when you are correcting an arti issue but with a lot CI kids you do not need to go this route.
This does not make sense when observing all those deaf children with speech issues, even if they was implanted early and exposured to AVT.

Can you document this statement you are making here?
flip is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-20-2008, 01:44 AM   #370 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,848
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
Yes, Jillo I would like a link. Flip, I googled about Japan..couldnt find anything about it. Thanks!
I discovered that, too. Thailand, Japan, Taiwan, China and some of the other countries in the far east are truly inaccessible through the net if one don't know their written codes So this rumor is to me yet to be confirmed or rejected.
flip is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-24-2008, 10:34 PM   #371 (permalink)
Registered User
 
loml's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,645
Question

originally posted by jillio

Quote:
I will look for the link to the research I referenced.
jillio - Found that link yet?
__________________
Quote:
“Laugh, because that is your purpose in life. Love, because that is what you came here for. Shine, because that is important.”
- Yogi Bhajan-
loml is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-25-2008, 12:00 PM   #372 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by loml View Post
originally posted by jillio



jillio - Found that link yet?
Do you see it posted?
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-25-2008, 12:13 PM   #373 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
You are welcome to read the information posted at the following:

http://www.teachersandfamilies.com/s...-biling.htmlre

During the last two decades bilingual-bicultural education programs (programs which recognize that children may come from a different culture and speak a different language in the home than in the school) have flourished in the United States as the ethnic composition of children attending public schools has become more diverse. In the late 1980's discussion of bilingual-bicultural education for children who are Deaf brought about new theories. (A capital D is used by bilingual-bicultural programs to identify deafness as a cultural, rather than a medical, issue.) According to Schirmer (1994) "the impetus for implementing bilingual-bicultural programs for children who are deaf comes from two sources: (1) The Deaf community, who advocate for the right to pass on their language and culture to succeeding generations; (2) the overall disappointing achievement of youngsters who are deaf. (p. 98) Althoughsmall gains have been made in the levels of reading achieved by the average child who is deaf, overall achievement remains considerably lower compared to their hearing peers despite ardent attempts to teach Deaf children through Total Communication (see ERIC Digest E559) and oral approaches (see ERIC Digest E551).

Addditional impetus for bilingual-bicultural programs comes from Sweden, where, in 1981, after years of grassroots activism by Deaf adults and parents of children who are Deaf, the Swedish Parliament passed a law stating that people who are Deaf need to be bilingual in order to function successfully in the family, school, and society (Mahshie, 1995). What does it mean to be bilingual-bicultural?


Or here:

Changes in Teacher Education Curriculum in Sweden | DEAF-INFO

Or here:

Reading Education for Hearing Impaired and Deaf Individuals

Or here:

Gallaudet Research Institute (GRI)- PVD Chair of Deaf Studies

Or here:

Literary Studies in English for the Deaf | Stockholm Challenge

That should keep you busy for awhile.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-04-2008, 01:26 PM   #374 (permalink)
Let It Snow!!!!
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: A place where crabs are popular
Posts: 40,307
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
You are welcome to read the information posted at the following:

http://www.teachersandfamilies.com/s...-biling.htmlre

During the last two decades bilingual-bicultural education programs (programs which recognize that children may come from a different culture and speak a different language in the home than in the school) have flourished in the United States as the ethnic composition of children attending public schools has become more diverse. In the late 1980's discussion of bilingual-bicultural education for children who are Deaf brought about new theories. (A capital D is used by bilingual-bicultural programs to identify deafness as a cultural, rather than a medical, issue.) According to Schirmer (1994) "the impetus for implementing bilingual-bicultural programs for children who are deaf comes from two sources: (1) The Deaf community, who advocate for the right to pass on their language and culture to succeeding generations; (2) the overall disappointing achievement of youngsters who are deaf. (p. 98) Althoughsmall gains have been made in the levels of reading achieved by the average child who is deaf, overall achievement remains considerably lower compared to their hearing peers despite ardent attempts to teach Deaf children through Total Communication (see ERIC Digest E559) and oral approaches (see ERIC Digest E551).

Addditional impetus for bilingual-bicultural programs comes from Sweden, where, in 1981, after years of grassroots activism by Deaf adults and parents of children who are Deaf, the Swedish Parliament passed a law stating that people who are Deaf need to be bilingual in order to function successfully in the family, school, and society (Mahshie, 1995). What does it mean to be bilingual-bicultural?


Or here:

Changes in Teacher Education Curriculum in Sweden | DEAF-INFO

Or here:

Reading Education for Hearing Impaired and Deaf Individuals

Or here:

Gallaudet Research Institute (GRI)- PVD Chair of Deaf Studies

Or here:

Literary Studies in English for the Deaf | Stockholm Challenge

That should keep you busy for awhile.

Good for the Swedens !!!
__________________
"Wine improves with age. The older I get, the better I like it."

--- Anonymous
shel90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-04-2008, 01:30 PM   #375 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
Good for the Swedens !!!
Yeah. They are really very progressive in their philosophies toward Deaf Ed and social policies.

I wonder.....how many of the oral only and TC proponents read the links I provided?
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-04-2008, 01:35 PM   #376 (permalink)
Let It Snow!!!!
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: A place where crabs are popular
Posts: 40,307
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Yeah. They are really very progressive in their philosophies toward Deaf Ed and social policies.

I wonder.....how many of the oral only and TC proponents read the links I provided?
I hope they take the time to read the links cuz they support what we have been trying to explain how important it is to build a strong first language that is 100% accessible to deaf children and use that to learn a 2nd language/develop higher literacy skills in English or any other language for that matter.

We have been here for 2 years and I feel that many still discredit us or call us anti-CI..whatever.
__________________
"Wine improves with age. The older I get, the better I like it."

--- Anonymous
shel90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-04-2008, 01:37 PM   #377 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
I hope they take the time to read the links cuz they support what we have been trying to explain how important it is to build a strong first language that is 100% accessible to deaf children and use that to learn a 2nd language/develop higher literacy skills in English or any other language for that matter.

We have been here for 2 years and I feel that many still discredit us or call us anti-CI..whatever.
And those that attempt to discredit us don't bother to read the research and the studies that we are citing, nor do they provide research to back their position. They just call names and make unfounded accusations.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-04-2008, 01:39 PM   #378 (permalink)
Let It Snow!!!!
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: A place where crabs are popular
Posts: 40,307
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
And those that attempt to discredit us don't bother to read the research and the studies that we are citing, nor do they provide research to back their position. They just call names and make unfounded accusations.
Since this thread is about respect for all so if they want respect for all, then they should apply it to themselves too.
__________________
"Wine improves with age. The older I get, the better I like it."

--- Anonymous
shel90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-04-2008, 01:44 PM   #379 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
Since this thread is about respect for all so if they want respect for all, then they should apply it to themselves too.
Unfortunately, that rarely occurs.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-04-2008, 02:12 PM   #380 (permalink)
Registered User
 
CrzyMeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pensacola Florida or coming back to Pensacola
Posts: 6,227
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via AIM to CrzyMeg Send a message via Yahoo to CrzyMeg
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Unfortunately, that rarely occurs.
Yeah that was true. I know.
__________________


A PROUD POLYNESIAN INDIAN
CrzyMeg is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-04-2008, 11:58 PM   #381 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Puyallup, Washington
Posts: 1,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackiesolorzano View Post
I have a question for all. If I can respect people's choices to just use ASL then why can't people respect my choices to raise my deaf teenagers orally and have them implanted. I do not understand why some people think they have the right to tell me that it was not my right to implant my children. What is happening is that a lot of you are scaring new parents away from seeking information from people in the Deaf culture. Why can we not just agree to disagree and treat each other with respect. Why can't people just admit that cochlear implants can be a very valuable tool.
I respect your decision, but read my post below. Please read about my own personal expierences.

Last edited by jasin; 07-05-2008 at 12:29 AM.
jasin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-05-2008, 12:24 AM   #382 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Puyallup, Washington
Posts: 1,570
Unhappy

Now as for myself, I have to say oralism and ear surgeries was the worst things I ever expierenced. I spent 6 years in speech therapy because they could not understand why I was unable to talk properly. They failed to understand that I was deaf and the only things I was hearing was with residual hearing.

Latter on they learnt that I was deaf and they ended up expiermenting on me trying to figure out why I was unable to properly hear. At one point in their expiermenting they stuck metal rods in my ears taking pictures of it trying to see what they could fix. It was the worst thing I ever expierenced in my life.

They spent years studying my ears trying to fix me and after 15 different ear surgeries I end up just becoming hard of hearing and adventually to where I am now, deaf again.


I have attributed all my failures in life to all of that. These expierences were very traumatic and as a result I never learnt, as strange as it may sound, how to be deaf. I never learnt any of our languages, sign languages, or our deaf culture.

So for myself, from my own personal expierences, I have to disgaree with oralism and trying to fix a deaf people.
jasin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-05-2008, 08:41 AM   #383 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
Miss-Delectable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,174
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
Since this thread is about respect for all so if they want respect for all, then they should apply it to themselves too.
I agree. But what do they know about respecting people who doesn't agree with them and actually had the temerity to demand our respect? *scoff*

Off topic, somewhat, I wonder why America, UK, Australia and others doesn't adopt Sweden's philosophy for the deaf. The irony is Sweden has been practicing this philosophy for over 20 years and rather successfully.
__________________
"Walking with a friend in the dark is better than walking alone in the light."
- Helen Keller
Miss-Delectable is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-05-2008, 09:28 AM   #384 (permalink)
Let It Snow!!!!
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: A place where crabs are popular
Posts: 40,307
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miss-Delectable View Post
I agree. But what do they know about respecting people who doesn't agree with them and actually had the temerity to demand our respect? *scoff*

Off topic, somewhat, I wonder why America, UK, Australia and others doesn't adopt Sweden's philosophy for the deaf. The irony is Sweden has been practicing this philosophy for over 20 years and rather successfully.
Because the audists want to keep full control of Deaf education and keep it their way.
__________________
"Wine improves with age. The older I get, the better I like it."

--- Anonymous
shel90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-05-2008, 10:20 AM   #385 (permalink)
V.I.P. Member
 
Miss-Delectable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,174
Blog Entries: 3
One of those days we'll kick the audists out into the cold and take back control of deaf education. It might not happen now, but later.
__________________
"Walking with a friend in the dark is better than walking alone in the light."
- Helen Keller
Miss-Delectable is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-05-2008, 12:32 PM   #386 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Puyallup, Washington
Posts: 1,570
Its the deaf people, us, who are messing up deaf culture, deaf education, and everything else to do with deafness.
jasin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-05-2008, 12:33 PM   #387 (permalink)
Let It Snow!!!!
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: A place where crabs are popular
Posts: 40,307
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasin View Post
Its the deaf people, us, who are messing up deaf culture, deaf education, and everything else to do with deafness.
Huh? Deaf people messed up Deaf culture, deaf education and everything else? Can you explain more because I am not understanding what you mean.
__________________
"Wine improves with age. The older I get, the better I like it."

--- Anonymous
shel90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-05-2008, 01:01 PM   #388 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Puyallup, Washington
Posts: 1,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
Huh? Deaf people messed up Deaf culture, deaf education and everything else? Can you explain more because I am not understanding what you mean.
Oh, I could make a whole list of things us deaf people do that is messing all this up.

Deafies who wont accept you as deaf or as a part of the deaf world if you are hard of hearing; even though, some hard of hearing are more deaf then some deaf. It happens all the time at deaf events. I see it at nearly every deaf event there is.

Heads of deaf events who expect you to bow to them and their demands whatever they may be. Many wont even talk to their fellow deafies unless they approve. I see it all the time!! They like to act high and mighty and better then everyone else.

Asl nazis who are deaf that wont even accept you as deaf if you don't sign 100% perfect or correct. They will reject you, ignore you, not even look at you, etc.. its happened to me personally many times. They ignore the fact that some deafs are still learning, some have disabilties, and some are just human .. not perfect and prone to making messing up.

Oral nazis who are deaf that try an force oralism on you and mandate there is only one way of communicating.. Speech, talk, voice, etc. They have infused this into our deaf schools and now have schools that don't even teach our language or other languages.
jasin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-05-2008, 01:23 PM   #389 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Tousi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 15,733
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasin View Post
Oh, I could make a whole list of things us deaf people do that is messing all this up.

Deafies who wont accept you as deaf or as a part of the deaf world if you are hard of hearing; even though, some hard of hearing are more deaf then some deaf. It happens all the time at deaf events. I see it at nearly every deaf event there is.

Heads of deaf events who expect you to bow to them and their demands whatever they may be. Many wont even talk to their fellow deafies unless they approve. I see it all the time!! They like to act high and mighty and better then everyone else.

Asl nazis who are deaf that wont even accept you as deaf if you don't sign 100% perfect or correct. They will reject you, ignore you, not even look at you, etc.. its happened to me personally many times. They ignore the fact that some deafs are still learning, some have disabilties, and some are just human .. not perfect and prone to making messing up.

Oral nazis who are deaf that try an force oralism on you and mandate there is only one way of communicating.. Speech, talk, voice, etc. They have infused this into our deaf schools and now have schools that don't even teach our language or other languages.
As in any group, there are "camps" and this is probably as it should be---choices of lifestyle; HOWEVER, when it comes to education, I think all of these "camps" within the culture have to have BILINGUALISM as the rallying cry, the central theme in the push for it. Thing of it is, that day of reckoning has been delayed by the hearing folks up in their ivory tower and by the extreme elements within these deaf "camps".
Tousi is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-05-2008, 01:31 PM   #390 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Puyallup, Washington
Posts: 1,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tousi View Post
As in any group, there are "camps" and this is probably as it should be---choices of lifestyle; HOWEVER, when it comes to education, I think all of these "camps" within the culture have to have BILINGUALISM as the rallying cry, the central theme in the push for it. Thing of it is, that day of reckoning has been delayed by the hearing folks up in their ivory tower and by the extreme elements within these deaf "camps".
Thats fine, but when these things divide us, separate us, etc.. it destroys our educational systems and our culture.

Last edited by jasin; 07-05-2008 at 01:33 PM. Reason: wrong word
jasin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 AM.


Join AllDeaf on Facebook!    Follow us on Twitter!

AllDeaf proudly supports St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Copyright © 2002-2013, AllDeaf.com. All Rights Reserved.