Miss-Delectable

Implants incite sound debate for the deaf

AS AN infant, a cochlear implant gave Sarah Keenan, now 10, the gift of hearing, but the decision gave her parents much angst.

"I agonised that the surgery might be telling her she wasn't good enough if she couldn't hear," said her mother, Roz Keenan. "Would it change her identity as she got older? I felt that, in the end, if I gave it to her she could choose later (how to communicate)." Sarah can now do both — talk and sign.

Tamara Trinder-Scacco made a different decision for her daughter. Kayla, 5, wears a hearing aid for environmental sound but is deaf to the spoken word.

"She can (have a cochlear implant) but we choose not to," said Ms Trinder-Scacco.

"I'm deaf, my husband's deaf and our first language is Auslan (sign language). When Kayla was born, I didn't know enough about cochlear at the time and I wasn't comfortable with it. It wasn't a hard decision for me — look at me, I grew up fine and I can see the same for Kayla provided she gets the support."

The difficult choice faced by these northern suburbs parents over the cochlear implant is shared by the deaf in general, even as the Federal Government's new national hearing screening program means more deaf infants than ever could gain from the device.

A cochlear implant, also known as a bionic ear, is a surgically implanted electronic device for the profoundly deaf. Unlike hearing aids, it does not amplify sound but directly stimulates any functioning auditory nerves in the inner ear. Invented by Melbourne researcher Graeme Clark in the 1970s, the implant became widely used from the mid-1980s.

The Government's screening program pledges that from 2011, all newborn babies will be screened for deafness. Now, 75 per cent are screened. About 500 children a year are born with profound to moderate deafness, but it is often not detected for months or years.

Professor Clark, founding director of La Trobe University's Centre for Bionic Ear and Neurosensory Research, said diagnosis before the age of 12 months was critical. "The new legislation will then enable severe to profoundly deaf children to compete with their hearing peers on a normal footing," said Professor Clark. "In Sweden, 95 per cent of profoundly deaf children have a cochlear implant."

Professor Clark said every year in Australia 100 children needed an implant. "Last year there were 70 new recipients. That means 30 deaf children — 30 per cent — did not have an implant when they needed one."

But the deaf community remains divided. "There's a huge school of thought for cochlear implants and there's a huge school of thought against cochlear implants," said Marc Curtis, manager of Vicdeaf Auslan and Interpreting Services in East Melbourne.

"It's a really politically charged, difficult, difficult issue to discuss."

Lobby group Deaf Australia says the implant "implies that deaf people are ill or incomplete individuals, are lonely and unhappy, cannot communicate effectively with others and are all desperately searching for a cure for their condition. (This) demeans deaf people, belittles their culture and language and makes no acknowledgment of the diversity of lives deaf people lead, or their many achievements."

David Peters, an information officer with Vicdeaf, and deaf himself, said the notion that deafness was a deficiency to be cured was offensive.

"The deaf community feel that when you're deaf, you're a normal person … I feel perfectly normal so I don't see why I should need to have that surgery."

The age at which children should have the implant was an "ongoing argument", he said, with some believing it should be a personal — not parental — decision.

But Professor Clark said infants needed to hear from an early age if they were going to speak. He said it was better for deaf children to have to hear rather than rely on sign language.

"Sign language has been of enormous help in the years gone by … but in the world of sound, it's extremely limited. It's a matter of choice, but instead of not being sure how effective children will be in the hearing world, they now have every opportunity to compete with their hearing peers."

There is also a risk that deaf people who don't have a cochlear implant could be marginalised. With more deaf people able to hear, the number using Auslan will shrink.

The 2006 census showed there were 2172 sign-language users in Victoria and 7150 Australia-wide.

The Royal Institute of Deaf and Blind Children's website states Auslan is "endangered" for reasons including better medical treatment for deafness, cochlear implants and falling enrolments in schools for the deaf.

*scoffs at Prof Clark, he wanted to cure deafness all because his father was deaf. He puts down AUSLAN and thinks we're not smart or independent because not all of us has cochlear implants.*

__________________

Deafness

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com

shel90

But Professor Clark said infants needed to hear from an early age if they were going to speak. He said it was better for deaf children to have to hear rather than rely on sign language.

"Sign language has been of enormous help in the years gone by … but in the world of sound, it's extremely limited. It's a matter of choice, but instead of not being sure how effective children will be in the hearing world, they now have every opportunity to compete with their hearing peers."

What a jerk!

With that attitude, that's why deaf people are discriminated constantly. It all starts with the hearing audists.

__________________
Shel~

"A child educated only at school is an uneducated child." -George Santayana

Buffalo

Isn't Professor Clark the same guy who invented the cochlear implant? If so, I didn't know that his father is deaf. Isn't the history repeating itself? Alexander Graham Bell's mother was deaf.

__________________

It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.
- Gilbert Chesterton

souggy

I have a big, big problem with this article. I was diagnosed with autism until I was diagnosed with a hearing loss a few years after I was born, not through a hearing test. Hearing test came back normal, but they stuck hearing aid in anyway, and then all the sudden I was a "normal deaf child." The computer results are still weird compared to the spoken aural tests. The computer says that I have almost nil hearing compared to the results of the aural tests.

Anyway, why I have a big problem? This:

I didn't learn how to speak until I was 8. I didn't know ASL until I was 3 or 4. I learned how to read before I knew ASL. So I KNOW that deaf people can learn how to speak as long the language centre of the brain is intact.

Anyway, when the school system wanted me to get a CI, and revisited the idea recently, I was told that I would be better off with hearing aid. They said that other than practicing, my only hope for fluent English would be if I go completely deaf, so the biofeedback would be completely eliminated. In reality, the CI would makes my spoken English WORSE, rather than better.

So this article peeves me.

Miss-Delectable

Yup, he's the inventor of CI. His father was stone deaf, but managed to own a pharmacy, which is a rarity for deaf people in that time, even now. He didn't know Auslan, and struggled with communication. So, from this Prof's observation, his father was to be pitied because he was deaf. You should read his book and you'll understand more.

__________________

Buffalo

He wrote several books. Which book did you have in your mind?

__________________

It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.
- Gilbert Chesterton

Bottesini

Sounds From Silence talks about his family a lot.

__________________
It's a joke Nathan!

Buffalo

Thanks. Amazon has used books on this starting from $49.98 USD which is too much for a 248-pages book. The new one goes for $178.81 USD. Expensive just like his cochlear implants!

__________________

It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.
- Gilbert Chesterton

Bottesini

Wow!

__________________
It's a joke Nathan!