AllDeaf.com
Our Sponsors

Go Back   AllDeaf.com > Deaf Interests > Deaf Education
  
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-10-2009, 03:16 PM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,746
History of Deaf education in Utah

A good friend of mine wrote this paper. I thought it could explain some of the educational issues that have been misunderstood by some people here.

http://www.uad.org/DeafEd/utah_deafe...0in%20Utah.pdf

It explains the USDB policy for mainstreaming and the laws that govern IEPs and the fact that a child with a hearing loss must have a delay to retain placement at the school for the Deaf.
faire_jour is online now   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Deafness

Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com
   
Old 04-10-2009, 03:57 PM   #2 (permalink)
In a pink and black world
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In the land of the free
Posts: 24,077
Blog Entries: 3
Siegel (2002) states, “Failed communication leads to failed education, then failed
education leads to a failed adulthood. Failed communication affects all aspect of life” As
90
a result, deaf and hard of hearing adults have a higher rate of mental illness and have
more concurrent health difficulties than their hearing counterparts (p.10).


quoted from the paper...
__________________
Shel~

"A child educated only at school is an uneducated child." -George Santayana


shel90 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 03:59 PM   #3 (permalink)
In a pink and black world
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In the land of the free
Posts: 24,077
Blog Entries: 3
When discussing a deaf
student’s appropriate placement in the IEP meeting, there is no established legal
requirement
that this student be assessed for communication and language proficiency or
provided services needed to ensure access to instruction (Siegel, 2005, p.7).


That's the problem
__________________
Shel~

"A child educated only at school is an uneducated child." -George Santayana


shel90 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 04:00 PM   #4 (permalink)
In a pink and black world
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In the land of the free
Posts: 24,077
Blog Entries: 3
For years, deaf and hard of hearing students have repeatedly been denied access to the
programs and communication available to all other children. Moreover, they deal with
failure to provide a qualified interpreter or access to a state school for the deaf. Most
importantly, deaf children are denied to what all other children take for granted: access to
the academic, social and linguistic components of an education (Siegel, 2005
).

__________________
Shel~

"A child educated only at school is an uneducated child." -George Santayana


shel90 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 04:02 PM   #5 (permalink)
In a pink and black world
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In the land of the free
Posts: 24,077
Blog Entries: 3
Families in Utah encounter many roadblocks when trying to have their child
enrolled in a special school because most districts have policies or practices that inhibit
such placements, using IDEA as justification. In the case of a deaf and hard of hearing
child such a practice is potentially harmful because of their unique language and
communication needs.


Was that the failure model u were referring to, FJ? Just wanted to make sure that I am understanding your point of view with this issue...
__________________
Shel~

"A child educated only at school is an uneducated child." -George Santayana


shel90 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 04:14 PM   #6 (permalink)
In a pink and black world
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In the land of the free
Posts: 24,077
Blog Entries: 3
It provides full language and communication
access in ASL and English on campus. The approach at JMS brought to a full circle the
bilingual approach that was used at schools for deaf children in the 19th century.


For those who made inccorect claims that BiBi was a new approach when it wasnt.

It was used at the schools for deaf children in the 1800s but wasnt called "BiBi" but the practices are exactly the same.
__________________
Shel~

"A child educated only at school is an uneducated child." -George Santayana


shel90 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 04:17 PM   #7 (permalink)
In a pink and black world
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In the land of the free
Posts: 24,077
Blog Entries: 3
Moreover, when
Melissa asked about JMS, she was actually told, "No, you don't want her [her daughter]
to go there! Don't you want her sent to TC? It has everything you could want." Moreover,
she was erroneously told that it was against JMS policy and philosophy to provide speech
services, and that children with cochlear implants were not allowed at JMS. Melissa was
told that her daughter could succeed in an oral classroom and that if she didn't then they
could consider moving her to a signing class.
Melissa asked if the teacher would
understand the signs her daughter already had and was told that everybody at USD could
understand a little but they would never sign back and that within a short time, the
daughter would stop signing. Melissa was also told that if her daughter didn't learn to talk
by the time she was 3 or 4 she would never be able to learn (Jensen, 2007, personal
communication, name used with permission). This story, which happened in 2006, is
reflective of the history of bias that USD has, and of the continued bias currently still at
USD as a result of the history.



Tsk Tsk Tsk...
__________________
Shel~

"A child educated only at school is an uneducated child." -George Santayana


shel90 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 04:19 PM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
When discussing a deaf
student’s appropriate placement in the IEP meeting, there is no established legal
requirement
that this student be assessed for communication and language proficiency or
provided services needed to ensure access to instruction (Siegel, 2005, p.7).


That's the problem
Exactly. And if they don't assessed for proficiency, they don't get information regarding the delays, either.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 04:24 PM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
It provides full language and communication
access in ASL and English on campus. The approach at JMS brought to a full circle the
bilingual approach that was used at schools for deaf children in the 19th century.


For those who made inccorect claims that BiBi was a new approach when it wasnt.

It was used at the schools for deaf children in the 1800s but wasnt called "BiBi" but the practices are exactly the same.
Bingo! How many times have we said it in the Deaf Ed threads?
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 04:28 PM   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
While this is a reasonably complete paper, if one is truly interested in the history of deaf ed., I will be glad to refer to several published books that go into great detail.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 04:32 PM   #11 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
Families in Utah encounter many roadblocks when trying to have their child
enrolled in a special school because most districts have policies or practices that inhibit
such placements, using IDEA as justification. In the case of a deaf and hard of hearing
child such a practice is potentially harmful because of their unique language and
communication needs.


Was that the failure model u were referring to, FJ? Just wanted to make sure that I am understanding your point of view with this issue...
Actually, the author mentions using IDEA as justification for not placing in special programs. That has nothing to do with delays or anything remotely resembling a "failure model", but is a reference to the LRE. We have discussed many times on this forum how the LRE is generally interpreted as meaning the home school district, and how that interpretation has a negative impact for the deaf child.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 04:35 PM   #12 (permalink)
In a pink and black world
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In the land of the free
Posts: 24,077
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Actually, the author mentions using IDEA as justification for not placing in special programs. That has nothing to do with delays or anything remotely resembling a "failure model", but is a reference to the LRE. We have discussed many times on this forum how the LRE is generally interpreted as meaning the home school district, and how that interpretation has a negative impact for the deaf child.
Yea, I understand that but I am trying to understand where FJ is coming from with this issue. Are people calling the LRE a failure model?
__________________
Shel~

"A child educated only at school is an uneducated child." -George Santayana


shel90 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 04:40 PM   #13 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
Yea, I understand that but I am trying to understand where FJ is coming from with this issue. Are people calling the LRE a failure model?
I don't know. I'm still not getting where that comes from, since it isn't a theory of education. The LRE is based on civil rights, not educational theory.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 06:25 PM   #14 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
It provides full language and communication
access in ASL and English on campus. The approach at JMS brought to a full circle the
bilingual approach that was used at schools for deaf children in the 19th century.


For those who made inccorect claims that BiBi was a new approach when it wasnt.

It was used at the schools for deaf children in the 1800s but wasnt called "BiBi" but the practices are exactly the same.
Helen Keller started out in ASL, didn't she?
__________________
Good thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from.
Lighthouse77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 06:30 PM   #15 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lighthouse77 View Post
Helen Keller started out in ASL, didn't she?
Kind of. She started out with fingerspelling, but it was the ASL alphabet.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 06:34 PM   #16 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,323
oh, whatever it was, it was her first language before she learned to speak. and she turned out pretty good.
__________________
Good thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from.
Lighthouse77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 09:36 PM   #17 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
I don't know. I'm still not getting where that comes from, since it isn't a theory of education. The LRE is based on civil rights, not educational theory.
I am telling you that in Utah, services are NOT given until a child is delayed and as soon as they become age appropriate, the services are pulled and they are mainstreamed. The law is in the process of being fought, so that kids can get services.
faire_jour is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 09:40 PM   #18 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,323
what type of service are you talking about ?
__________________
Good thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from.
Lighthouse77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 09:42 PM   #19 (permalink)
In a pink and black world
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In the land of the free
Posts: 24,077
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
I am telling you that in Utah, services are NOT given until a child is delayed and as soon as they become age appropriate, the services are pulled and they are mainstreamed. The law is in the process of being fought, so that kids can get services.
Nobody is saying that you are lying but just that this is new stuff. That's a shame if Utah does that.
__________________
Shel~

"A child educated only at school is an uneducated child." -George Santayana


shel90 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 09:44 PM   #20 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lighthouse77 View Post
what type of service are you talking about ?
You can't be at the School for the Deaf if you are not delayed. They pull the IEP and then you have to be mainstreamed. You can have a 504, and accomadations, but not Teacher of the Deaf services or a placement at the Deaf school.
faire_jour is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 09:48 PM   #21 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,323
oh ok.. So basically they don't let the parents decide what best for their deaf kids. They do the deciding because it is their tax money. One time I did not want to be in English LD class. I told my mom that I rather fail than be in that class (but honestly, it was my horrible English teacher who mumbled so much and refused to help me..and then demand that I'm better off in LD. It became a "contract" that I had to stay til 9th or 10th grade). they told my mom they did not want me to fail at all and forced us to be in that class rather I liked it or not.

and guess what, I quit trying. I just didn't care
__________________
Good thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from.
Lighthouse77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 12:47 AM   #22 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lighthouse77 View Post
oh, whatever it was, it was her first language before she learned to speak. and she turned out pretty good.
There you go!
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 12:50 AM   #23 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
I am telling you that in Utah, services are NOT given until a child is delayed and as soon as they become age appropriate, the services are pulled and they are mainstreamed. The law is in the process of being fought, so that kids can get services.
And I'm telling you if that is true, they are in violation of several Federal laws. There is nothing to fight in regard to the law. The Federal law is already on the books. Federal law over rides state law. The state law does not need to be changed. The Federal law is already in place to over ride the state law. If parents are allowing the state of Utah to engage in this practice, they are in need of some decent advocates that know what they are talking about and how to get things done.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 12:52 AM   #24 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
Nobody is saying that you are lying but just that this is new stuff. That's a shame if Utah does that.
Its a shame if the parents are allowing them to break Federal law. I am absolutely amazed that no one has taken them to court before now. They get away with it because the parents are allowing them to get away with it.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 12:56 AM   #25 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by faire_jour View Post
You can't be at the School for the Deaf if you are not delayed. They pull the IEP and then you have to be mainstreamed. You can have a 504, and accomadations, but not Teacher of the Deaf services or a placement at the Deaf school.
A 504 does not provide for accommodations. Only an IEP provides for accommodations.

Federal law states that unless the mainstream school can provide the accommodations as needed for the particular disability, they must send the child to a school that can provide the accommodation. Deafness is the only qualification necessary to get provision of services for the deaf. Delays are not necessary to provide for accommodation. Delays are necessary to have remediation as an accommodation only.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 12:57 AM   #26 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lighthouse77 View Post
oh ok.. So basically they don't let the parents decide what best for their deaf kids. They do the deciding because it is their tax money. One time I did not want to be in English LD class. I told my mom that I rather fail than be in that class (but honestly, it was my horrible English teacher who mumbled so much and refused to help me..and then demand that I'm better off in LD. It became a "contract" that I had to stay til 9th or 10th grade). they told my mom they did not want me to fail at all and forced us to be in that class rather I liked it or not.

and guess what, I quit trying. I just didn't care
Unfortunately, many kids in the mainstream quit trying and stop caring because they aren't getting what they need. It is truly very sad.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 02:38 AM   #27 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
Siegel (2002) states, “Failed communication leads to failed education, then failed
education leads to a failed adulthood. Failed communication affects all aspect of life” As
90
a result, deaf and hard of hearing adults have a higher rate of mental illness and have
more concurrent health difficulties than their hearing counterparts (p.10).


quoted from the paper...
The statement about the incidence of mental illness in the deaf population concerns me a bit. There has been much research done on this topic by well respected psychologists and psychiatrists, and the general consensus is that deaf people do not have a higher rate of mental illness than hearing people. They are misdiagnosed with mental illness more often, however, because the communication differences create a situation where what is a normal response for them is seen as symptomology because the professional doing the assessment did not take cultural and linguistic factors into account. However , that statement suggests that deaf people are more likely to be mentally ill just because they are deaf. That is a very innacurrate message to give.

It has been found that deaf adolescents have adjustment disorders at a higher rate than their hearing peers, but that doesn't have so much to do with their deafness as it does to the environment they are in. Deaf students with access to deaf peers and role models do not have as great a rate of adjustment disorders as do those that are mainstreamed without the psycho-social support they need. Situational depression and anxiety are also a bit greater in the adolescent/young adult deaf population for the same reason. However, the rates of clinical depression are about the same in the hearing population and the deaf population.

These are just more reasons why it is important to make sure that a deaf child has the appropriate educational placement. A placement that does not provide the psycho-social support a child needs puts them at greater risk for adjustment problems and depression and anxiety. It is not the deafness that is responsible; it is the environment.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 09:49 AM   #28 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,323
I think deaf people have a harder time getting help if they do have a mental illness. Lack of communication never help them.
__________________
Good thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from.
Lighthouse77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 12:14 PM   #29 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 32,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lighthouse77 View Post
I think deaf people have a harder time getting help if they do have a mental illness. Lack of communication never help them.
I will certainly agree with that. I would love to see more therapists and counselors becoming fluent in ASL.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 12:42 PM   #30 (permalink)
~*~JUST ME!!~*~
 
LakeTahoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lost somewhere on the Earth!
Posts: 13,537
I went to USD for about 4 years and I don't remember the strike was going on. I was like 5 to 9 years old when I was there.
__________________
LakeTahoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 PM.


Join AllDeaf on Facebook!    Follow us on Twitter!

All text, images, and other content are Copyright © 2002-2009 by AllDeaf.com. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.