AllDeaf.com
 
 
 
Our Sponsors

Go Back   AllDeaf.com > Deaf Interests > Deaf Education

  

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-28-2008, 12:05 PM   #361 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,186
And the concept of layered curriculum is more readily addressed through a Bi-Bi approach than any other approach in deaf ed. Why? Because while students indeed to possess differrent learning preferences, the information must be able to get in before it cqn be processed and used.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Deafness

Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com
   
Old 01-28-2008, 02:37 PM   #362 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 430
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockdrummer View Post
More re-enforcement that each child is different and the teaching styles should be adjusted.
Jillio already did a good response, but want to add that bi-bi and TC programs as a last resort for deaf students, not oral programs, clearly shows problems with facilicating student centered learning in oral deaf education.

Oral deaf education, bi-bi or TC are not specific teaching styles but modes of communication.
flip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 02:43 PM   #363 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 430
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Kind of like talking about a 1950's radio program when you really meant to refer to a piece of literature with a title that in no way resembled the title of the radio program? I find reference to an invasion by aliens when one meant to refer to political treatise a protrayal in what really doesn't know.

Perhaps if you really were informed about Cued Speech you would be able to answer such questions rather than attempting to avoid them.
Now I got it! Loml is a clever ASL activist. Wow, no one has been so succesfull with turning people away from an oral deaf education tool as loml on AD.
flip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 03:17 PM   #364 (permalink)
Registered User
 
loml's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,250
flip - Your statements paint a clear picture of your naivity regarding the integration of Cued Speech within deaf education.
__________________
Quote:
....Cued Speech has substantial data showing that it enables deaf children to attain competency in English at the level of hearing students grade by grade. I know of no other system that enables this to happen.... As more and more young deaf persons achieve academically because of this system, deaf leaders will need to re-examine their options.
- Dr. Edward C. Merrill, Jr. past president of Gallaudet
loml is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 06:28 PM   #365 (permalink)
Weapon of Mass Percussion
 
rockdrummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 2,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by flip View Post
Jillio already did a good response, but want to add that bi-bi and TC programs as a last resort for deaf students, not oral programs, clearly shows problems with facilicating student centered learning in oral deaf education.

Oral deaf education, bi-bi or TC are not specific teaching styles but modes of communication.
With all due respect flip, I'm not sure I understand or agree with those statements. It looks like you are saying that there are problems with facilitating student centered learning in bi-bi and TC programs? Please correct me if I have mis-understood that. Also I think that each of those approaches can be considered teaching styles. At least with my limited knowledge I would consider them as such.

Education consists of much more than language. Requiring language in order to learn is a given. The purpose is to point out the fact that one size doesn't fit all in educational approaches which has been re-enforced by the information I have provided amongst other things. That is not to say that within a given program kids will or wont do well. There are successes and failures in all programs. Even kids within a specific program will advance at different rates. This happens to hearing kids too. The importance of language aquisition can't be understated but there is much beyond aquiring language that should be considered.

Personally, I like the idea of brain based learning. I also like the idea of fitting the teaching methods to the childs learning style. I subscribe to the theories that suggest to use different approaches in order to stimulate the mind. One might even argue that could apply to learning language as well. To me fitting the teaching methods to the childs learning style would be a true IEP.
rockdrummer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 06:45 PM   #366 (permalink)
Sun Whorshipper
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: A Desert Rat that has found herself in Maryland
Posts: 12,478
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockdrummer View Post
More re-enforcement that each child is different and the teaching styles should be adjusted.
Rockdrummer, while I was reading all these different methodologies of teaching before reaching the part about the layered curriculm, I was thinking that I do a little bit of all in my classroom. When I read about the layered curriculm, I can say that I use the layered curriculm or methodology with my class. It sounds like I am using beginning "B" layer.

Thanks for sharing this. I learned something new today.
__________________
~Shel~
shel90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 06:47 PM   #367 (permalink)
Sun Whorshipper
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: A Desert Rat that has found herself in Maryland
Posts: 12,478
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockdrummer View Post
With all due respect flip, I'm not sure I understand or agree with those statements. It looks like you are saying that there are problems with facilitating student centered learning in bi-bi and TC programs? Please correct me if I have mis-understood that. Also I think that each of those approaches can be considered teaching styles. At least with my limited knowledge I would consider them as such.

Education consists of much more than language. Requiring language in order to learn is a given. The purpose is to point out the fact that one size doesn't fit all in educational approaches which has been re-enforced by the information I have provided amongst other things. That is not to say that within a given program kids will or wont do well. There are successes and failures in all programs. Even kids within a specific program will advance at different rates. This happens to hearing kids too. The importance of language aquisition can't be understated but there is much beyond aquiring language that should be considered.

Personally, I like the idea of brain based learning. I also like the idea of fitting the teaching methods to the childs learning style. I subscribe to the theories that suggest to use different approaches in order to stimulate the mind. One might even argue that could apply to learning language as well. To me fitting the teaching methods to the childs learning style would be a true IEP.

I also like the idea of brain-based learning too. I will look more into it at my work.

I have always been a firm believer of meeting each child's learning style so reading all that made me realize that I am already doing that! LOL! I could improve, of course.
__________________
~Shel~
shel90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 07:38 PM   #368 (permalink)
Weapon of Mass Percussion
 
rockdrummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 2,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by loml View Post
rockdrummer - One of the reason that I support Cued Speech is the fact that it is muti-model and muti-sensory. We are all a combination of learning types/styles. Deaf/hoh and hearing children benefit from intergation of the Cued Speech system into their learning.
Thanks loml. I know for a fact that CS has it's place and has helped where other stratigies have failed. That's not to say that it's for everyone just as I don't believe any one program is for everyone. That's the point to this thread. One size doesn't fit all. I like the concept of programs that offer options and taylor the stratagy to the students learning profile.
rockdrummer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 07:40 PM   #369 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
Angel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockdrummer View Post
Thanks loml. I know for a fact that CS has it's place and has helped where other stratigies have failed. That's not to say that it's for everyone just as I don't believe any one program is for everyone. That's the point to this thread. One size doesn't fit all. I like the concept of programs that offer options and taylor the stratagy to the students learning profile.
I agreed, same here.
Angel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 07:58 PM   #370 (permalink)
Weapon of Mass Percussion
 
rockdrummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 2,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
Rockdrummer, while I was reading all these different methodologies of teaching before reaching the part about the layered curriculm, I was thinking that I do a little bit of all in my classroom. When I read about the layered curriculm, I can say that I use the layered curriculm or methodology with my class. It sounds like I am using beginning "B" layer.

Thanks for sharing this. I learned something new today.
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
I also like the idea of brain-based learning too. I will look more into it at my work.

I have always been a firm believer of meeting each child's learning style so reading all that made me realize that I am already doing that! LOL! I could improve, of course.
Thanks Shel and I too have learned much from it. I’m sorry but I meant to say Brain based teaching in my previous post and not brain based learning. Of course learning is brain based. *whacking myself

Actually in the layered curriculum approach, the “B” layer is the second layer. Not the beginning layer. The layers are in reverse order where layer “C” is first, then “B” and lastly “A”. I find it funny that the experts have the A, B C’s backwards.

Also as I understand it, Student-Centered instruction, Differentiated Instruction, and Layered Curriculum are all brain based teaching strategies.

To me the conclusion is compelling. They say it allows teachers to give every child a special education but I believe it allows them to give every child an individualized special education. What I would consider a true IEP
.

Quote:
Conclusion

Research has made it clear that that there is not any one "best" way to deliver instruction. Some objectives are better met when student-centered approaches are used while others may need a more teacher-centered approach. The fact that educators need to be able to "read and flex" with the differing needs of their students is irrefutable. Today, more than ever, with all of the high stakes testing and accountability measures, teachers need to possess a large repertoire of instructional approaches. Layered Curriculum may be the closest thing yet to that magic formula that educators are so frantically searching for. After all, it allows teachers to "give every child a special education" (Nunley, 2004).
rockdrummer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 08:16 PM   #371 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by loml View Post
flip - Your statements paint a clear picture of your naivity regarding the integration of Cued Speech within deaf education.
Uhhhh....did you mean naivte or nativity?
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 08:20 PM   #372 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
I also like the idea of brain-based learning too. I will look more into it at my work.

I have always been a firm believer of meeting each child's learning style so reading all that made me realize that I am already doing that! LOL! I could improve, of course.
Agree with you, RD, and flip. Brain based learning is a valuable strategy. Only by knowing how the brain perceives,l processes, and comprehends to meaning the information provided can we address the specific needs of the students.

There is always room for improvement. But from what I know of your program and teaching style, I would venture to say that you are far ahead of most.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 08:38 PM   #373 (permalink)
Weapon of Mass Percussion
 
rockdrummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 2,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Uhhhh....did you mean naivte or nativity?
Come on.. you know what she meant.
rockdrummer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 08:43 PM   #374 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
Cheri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: All I wanted was a white knight with a good heart, soft touch, fast horse, ride me off into the sunset
Posts: 20,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
But from what I know of your program and teaching style, I would venture to say that you are far ahead of most.
I respectfully disagree because some bi bi program(s) use voice and mouth moments in their teaching style program. I find that more benefits for the deaf children than without the use of voice and mouth moments. so that any deaf children can use both and could able to switch between the two, because of that every deaf child has different needs. of course that's in my opinion.

I'm sure Shel90 is good at what she does as a teacher, I'm not speaking of her personally. I'm only stating the teaching style to accommodate the needs of deaf students.
__________________
Cheri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 08:54 PM   #375 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheri View Post
I respectfully disagree because some bi bi program(s) use voice and mouth moments in their teaching style program. I find that more benefits for the deaf children than without the use of voice and mouth moments. so that any deaf children can use both and could able to switch between the two, because of that every deaf child has different needs. of course that's in my opinion.

I'm sure Shel90 is good at what she does as a teacher, I'm not speaking of her personally. I'm only stating the teaching style to accommodate the needs of deaf students.
I was speaking of Shel personally. I was commenting on her personal teaching style, and the methodology she uses. And shel does use mouth movements, and voice is used with English. So the student does have the opportunity to switch between the two and practice all skills.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 08:56 PM   #376 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockdrummer View Post
Come on.. you know what she meant.
Can't be sure without clarification. I thought loml actually meant "War and Peace" when he said "War of the Worlds", but it turns out he actually meant "Animal Farm".
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 09:08 PM   #377 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
Cheri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: All I wanted was a white knight with a good heart, soft touch, fast horse, ride me off into the sunset
Posts: 20,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
And shel does use mouth movements, and voice is used with English. So the student does have the opportunity to switch between the two and practice all skills.
She does? from what I've been reading I was told it was impossible. You guys confused me, I need something strong to drink.
__________________
Cheri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 09:12 PM   #378 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheri View Post
She does? from what I've been reading I was told it was impossible. You guys confused me, I need something strong to drink.
No, it is not impossible to use mouth and lip movements with ASL. That is where everyone got confused, me included.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 09:47 PM   #379 (permalink)
Weapon of Mass Percussion
 
rockdrummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 2,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Can't be sure without clarification. I thought loml actually meant "War and Peace" when he said "War of the Worlds", but it turns out he actually meant "Animal Farm".
Put each of your choices in the context of the scentence and it should become evident which was intended.
rockdrummer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 10:02 PM   #380 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockdrummer View Post
Put each of your choices in the context of the scentence and it should become evident which was intended.
Not always. We have been cautioned to ask for clarification.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 10:11 PM   #381 (permalink)
AAACCK! I got BORGED!
 
deafskeptic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,234
Quote:
Originally Posted by flip View Post
Now I got it! Loml is a clever ASL activist. Wow, no one has been so succesfull with turning people away from an oral deaf education tool as loml on AD.
ROFL! QFT!
__________________
Left ear implanted with Med-El on April 24 2007.
Activated on May 9th.
deafskeptic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 01:16 AM   #382 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 430
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockdrummer View Post
With all due respect flip, I'm not sure I understand or agree with those statements. It looks like you are saying that there are problems with facilitating student centered learning in bi-bi and TC programs? Please correct me if I have mis-understood that. Also I think that each of those approaches can be considered teaching styles. At least with my limited knowledge I would consider them as such.

Education consists of much more than language. Requiring language in order to learn is a given. The purpose is to point out the fact that one size doesn't fit all in educational approaches which has been re-enforced by the information I have provided amongst other things. That is not to say that within a given program kids will or wont do well. There are successes and failures in all programs. Even kids within a specific program will advance at different rates. This happens to hearing kids too. The importance of language aquisition can't be understated but there is much beyond aquiring language that should be considered.

Personally, I like the idea of brain based learning. I also like the idea of fitting the teaching methods to the childs learning style. I subscribe to the theories that suggest to use different approaches in order to stimulate the mind. One might even argue that could apply to learning language as well. To me fitting the teaching methods to the childs learning style would be a true IEP.
Sorry for beeing unclear! I was saying that bi-bi is the ultimate place for student centred learning, or teacher centred, for deaf students. When students fails in other programs, it's a sign that those programs aren't able to facilicate students with proper teaching style. Students are seldom sent away from bi-bi, but often gets students from mainstream and oral programs. The philiosophy behind bi-bi and student centred learning are striking similar. But I strongly disagree that bi-bi or oral deaf educations are specific teaching styles. Bi-bi can facilicate different teaching styles, as oral education can do. Speech, ASL, listening, lipreading and so on can influence teaching styles, but speech vs. sign language and teaching styles are two very different things to me.

If one program can't provide different teaching styles, it's very rigid, limiting and showing signs of outdated pedagogy. Teaching styles can be limited due to lack of communication and language input and output, and here language comes into the picture.

Hope this was more clear.
flip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 04:13 AM   #383 (permalink)
Sun Whorshipper
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: A Desert Rat that has found herself in Maryland
Posts: 12,478
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
I was speaking of Shel personally. I was commenting on her personal teaching style, and the methodology she uses. And shel does use mouth movements, and voice is used with English. So the student does have the opportunity to switch between the two and practice all skills.
Thanks and you got it on all counts. One of my students learned ASL just 2 years ago and sometimes he is lost so I switch to spoken language to ensure that he understands. But I NEVER use both at the same time..voicing and ASL. If I am gonna voice, I will drop the signs and if I am gonna sign, I will drop voicing.

So that student gets a pure model of English when I switch to spoken English to fill in the gaps for him since he is still learning ASL. It helps him.
__________________
~Shel~
shel90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 06:33 AM   #384 (permalink)
Premium Member