AllDeaf.com
Mobile - Perks - Store - Advertise - Spy  

Go Back   AllDeaf.com > Deaf Community > Current Events
LIKE AllDeaf on Facebook FOLLOW AllDeaf on Twitter
  
Reply
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 10-23-2009, 01:51 PM   #31 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdaigle430 View Post
The article did not but the comments on this thread did. Everyone has an opnion yes, but, the author is defending his book from parents who publicly slammed it. Therefore he has a right to publicly defend it no? The movie itself was rated PG(Parental Guidance) so If you don't want you kid to watch-don't. Parents that are overbearing or overprotective can result in bonfires where books are burned from the community library. They even closed our local drive in theater because it promoted "sexual tendencies" This happened in my community when I was a child and it's ugly, senseless and stupid. No, my parents were smart and were against it.

No they will not be deprived later in life from not being able to watch the movie, but nonetheless it was a good story and they are missing out.
Exactly. The PG rating says it all. Parental Guidance. Guide your own child, and allow other parents to guide theirs as they see fit. No need to makle a public spectacle over the decision you make on the Parental Guidance warning. It is not as if the parents that don't want their child to see it haven't been forwarned. That is what the rating system is all about.

The actions of these parents border on attempts at censorship. I don't blame the author at all for defending his book. He could have been a bit more restrained in doing so, but the parents slamming the book and the movie certainly weren't showing any restraint.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Deafness

Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com
   
Unread 10-23-2009, 01:53 PM   #32 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banjo View Post
Maybe he should had told them to go to heaven, but then the atheists would had thrown their arms up in furor.

Can't please everybody. He certainly didn't say it to please the parents. I doubt he cares though.
The parents certainly weren't attempting to please him, either. And I doubt seriously that he cares, either. The parents we are talking about certainly aren't going to hurt his profit margins. They were not going to purchase the book or allow their kids to see the movie anyway. They just wanted to run their mouths to the media.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-23-2009, 01:54 PM   #33 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 60,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by sallylou View Post
I'm anxious to see the Percy Jackson movie when it comes out. My kid has already learned the Greek gods because of reading the book. Very cool!

Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief
Shame on you! Allowing your child to learn mythology!
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-23-2009, 02:05 PM   #34 (permalink)
Expelled
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 11,650
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
Shame on you! Allowing your child to learn mythology!
Oh the outrage! Burn her at the stake!
Banjo is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-23-2009, 02:38 PM   #35 (permalink)
Granny Terp
 
Reba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 39,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banjo View Post
...Let's move on. Life is short.
True.
Reba is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-27-2012, 08:13 AM   #36 (permalink)
Registered User
 
kokonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reba View Post
I wouldn't want my children to read or watch something by a man who displays such disrespect for the parents.
Indeed. Plus, there is more.

Quote:
Maurice Sendak may have been even wilder than his "wild things."

In one of the children's book author's last interviews before he died of a stroke in May, Sendak said he thought about trying to assassinate former President George W. Bush and former Vice President Dick Cheney.

"Bush was president, I thought, 'Be brave. Tie a bomb to your shirt. Insist on going to the White House. And I want to have a big hug with the vice president, definitely. And his wife, and the president, and his wife, and anybody else that can fit into the love hug,'" Sendak told The Comics Journal's founder Gary Groth in an interview that will be published in the magazine's next edition.

"And then we'll blow ourselves up, and I'd be a hero," Sendak continued.

"It would have been a very brave and wonderful thing," said Sendak, who wrote the whimsical "Where the Wild Things Are."
Maurice Sendak Said Killing Bush Would Have Been 'Wonderful' - Yahoo! News

He turns out to be a neurotic and hateful man who wish people death thinking he'd be a hero to do such a moronic thing such as assassinating Pres. Bush and his wife (and anybody else caught in the explosion). It's time to burn his books. His books aren't worth having. There's a difference to have a strong opinion and argument vs blowing people up just because you disagree. May he rot in hell.
__________________
Before AD.

After AD.

"Restriction on free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us."
-Thurgood Marshall, former Supreme Court Justice


"... turns out they are telling the truth."
kokonut is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-27-2012, 08:20 AM   #37 (permalink)
Granny Terp
 
Reba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 39,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by kokonut View Post
Indeed. Plus, there is more.

He turns out to be a neurotic and hateful man who wish people death thinking he'd be a hero to do such a moronic thing such as assassinating Pres. Bush and his wife (and anybody else caught in the explosion). It's time to burn his books. His books aren't worth having. There's a difference to have a strong opinion and argument vs blowing people up just because you disagree. May he rot in hell.
I don't agree with book burnings. The best way to protest is to inform people about the books and authors, and then don't buy the books.
Reba is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-27-2012, 09:32 AM   #38 (permalink)
Registered User
 
kokonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reba View Post
I don't agree with book burnings. The best way to protest is to inform people about the books and authors, and then don't buy the books.
I'm talking about if you have that book...burn it. Not worth having that in your house. And I agree, inform people about that book and not buy it.
__________________
Before AD.

After AD.

"Restriction on free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us."
-Thurgood Marshall, former Supreme Court Justice


"... turns out they are telling the truth."
kokonut is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 PM.


Join AllDeaf on Facebook!    Follow us on Twitter!

AllDeaf proudly supports St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Copyright © 2002-2013, AllDeaf.com. All Rights Reserved.