AllDeaf.com
Our Sponsors

Go Back   AllDeaf.com > Deaf Community > Current Events


  
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-09-2008, 07:49 AM   #31 (permalink)
Sun Whorshipper
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: A Desert Rat that has found herself in Maryland
Posts: 13,695
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
What about the guaranteed right to privacy? What about confidentiality of medical information? What about innocent until proven guilty? Personally, I don't wnat the government involved in my adult, consenting sexual realtionship, my medical records, or to start assuming that the citicens of this country are guilty without evidence and proof. This bill is a blatant civil rights violation. And it buys into some of the most destructive stereotypes that can be perpetrated: that all women are deceptive and cannot be trusted. Why don't we just go back to believing that people of African American descent are automatically criminal, and that people with disabilities are less than intelligent? Those are the same types of assumptions that we have fought so hard to get rid of under the law, and now we have alwa proposed that is one huge leap backward. Shall we go back to the stereotype that women are weaker and less intelligent than men, and that by nature of the fact that they have menses, they are more prone to mental defects and hysteria?
__________________
~Shel~
shel90 is offline  
Alt Today
Deafness

Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com
   
Old 03-09-2008, 07:57 AM   #32 (permalink)
Lets ride horses!
 
Phillips's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Somewhere in Northeast
Posts: 6,344
Blog Entries: 3
Very Interesting!!!



I remember one of my friends told me about her cousin or uncle.< I forget? but ** I typing Here "Uncle" ***

Her Uncle is very upset that His surprised Teen daughter shows up his door! She tell him that Why that He never been in her life He is so surprised and sad he was unexpected that "What …You re my daughter?" He was so confused because her mother never told him! He contacted with her mother and talks what is going on. He never knew that have daughter. Her mom told him Oh well I found new boyfriend after Uncle. He earned more of money and steady job. Uncle does not have money and unsteady job ....

Uncle was so mad and Of course, He needed to take his daughter to DNA to prove. Good enough that his daughter matches DNA with her Uncle... He felt so sick and vomits!

What is more? After Her long time boyfriend dump and no support daughter's mom! Her mom decided to take Uncle to court for dead beat Daddy but Of course Uncle Won by court and do not have to pay her mom!

also remove her boyfriend name and change to Uncle name on her Birth Cerf.



Now my friend told me that their daughter is fuck up and wear the black clothes. She put too much color black eyeliner on her eyes and lip


I believe that her mom did cause completely messy with daughter and Uncle!



umm I think its good idea for Paternity test before birth Cerf.
__________________
***Enjoy life today, Yesterday has past and Tomorrow may never come.***


Phillips is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 10:11 AM   #33 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Byrdie714's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Washington coast.
Posts: 2,963
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
That is hardly justification for mandatory paternity testing in all births. If a man was slapped with child support without DNA evidence showing that he was the father, it was because he signed the birth certificate stating that he was the father. By your reasoning, we assume the child is NOT a product of a monogamous relationship until it is proven that he/she is. Totally in reverse of the legal concept of innocent until proven guilty. Mandatory paternity testing assumes guilt until proven innocent. And worse, yet, it automatically assumes the guilt on the part of the woman, which is gender bias in the extreme.
It's also gender bias in the extreme when a woman accuses a man of being a father when he isn't!
Byrdie714 is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 10:13 AM   #34 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Byrdie714's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Washington coast.
Posts: 2,963
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
And this bill assumes that ALL mothers, you and I included, Cheri, lie to their children about their parentage. We are being assumed guilty, and have to prove that we are honest.
And that is an issue you have a problem with?

There is nothing wrong with going the "extra step" to prove that one is being honest.

All it seems that one wants to do is to "blame it on the man" when in fact it takes two to tango.
Byrdie714 is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 10:15 AM   #35 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Byrdie714's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Washington coast.
Posts: 2,963
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angel View Post
I definitely do understand what you both are saying Cherie and Byrdie, but what about those women who are faithful, have to take paternity test before the father's name goes on the birth certificate, don't you see that as an "insult" ? ..
If I suspect my wife of cheating, yes I would.
Byrdie714 is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 10:20 AM   #36 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Byrdie714's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Washington coast.
Posts: 2,963
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
What about the guaranteed right to privacy? What about confidentiality of medical information? What about innocent until proven guilty? Personally, I don't wnat the government involved in my adult, consenting sexual realtionship, my medical records, or to start assuming that the citicens of this country are guilty without evidence and proof. This bill is a blatant civil rights violation. And it buys into some of the most destructive stereotypes that can be perpetrated: that all women are deceptive and cannot be trusted. Why don't we just go back to believing that people of African American descent are automatically criminal, and that people with disabilities are less than intelligent? Those are the same types of assumptions that we have fought so hard to get rid of under the law, and now we have alwa proposed that is one huge leap backward. Shall we go back to the stereotype that women are weaker and less intelligent than men, and that by nature of the fact that they have menses, they are more prone to mental defects and hysteria?
Byrdie714 is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 10:22 AM   #37 (permalink)
Sun Whorshipper
 
shel90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: A Desert Rat that has found herself in Maryland
Posts: 13,695
Blog Entries: 1
What if people cant afford the extra cost? What then?
__________________
~Shel~
shel90 is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 12:41 PM   #38 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
Angel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,695
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byrdie714 View Post
If I suspect my wife of cheating, yes I would.
Fair enough ..
Angel is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 01:40 PM   #39 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byrdie714 View Post
It's also gender bias in the extreme when a woman accuses a man of being a father when he isn't!
How so? We are talking about laws that create gender bias, not an individuals actions. You can hold the entire society responsible for one person's actions. If a man has been accused of fathering a child, there are already procedures in place to determine the acurracy of that accusation.
jillio is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 01:42 PM   #40 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byrdie714 View Post
If I suspect my wife of cheating, yes I would.
And you already have the right to request that. Simply because you believe your wife to be cheating does not automatically transfer to "All women cheat and therefore must have a DNA test done at the birth of every child they bear." Maybe you should make better choices in partners rather than expecting all of us to be responsible for your errors in judgement.
jillio is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 01:44 PM   #41 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byrdie714 View Post
And that is an issue you have a problem with?

There is nothing wrong with going the "extra step" to prove that one is being honest.

All it seems that one wants to do is to "blame it on the man" when in fact it takes two to tango.
From someone who claims to be an attorney, I would think you would have a firm grasp on the concept of innocent until proven guilty. Should I automatically assume that everything you say is a lie? That is what this bill would be encouraging.
jillio is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 01:45 PM   #42 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
What if people cant afford the extra cost? What then?
And what about an infertile couple that uses a sperm bank to concieve? This law would violate allsorts of confidentiality laws in that case.
jillio is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 02:13 PM   #43 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
Cheri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: All I wanted was a white knight with a good heart, soft touch, fast horse, ride me off into the sunset
Posts: 20,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio View Post
How so? We are talking about laws that create gender bias, not an individuals actions. You can hold the entire society responsible for one person's actions. If a man has been accused of fathering a child, there are already procedures in place to determine the acurracy of that accusation.
It seems this bill pose a danger to you, worrying about honest people being testing, It's about having the "right" father presence in a child's life. The fact is there are numerous of mothers who had lied about the paternity of the child's father. It takes two people to create a life and nobody can change the fact that two people have created a child together. Both of them have rights and obligations as parents. It's about doing what's right in the eyes of the child. It's not about you, or I. That's why I did not even think about myself when I support this bill, I thought about all the children out there. I think this bill will protect the future emotional scars in the child's life, I have faith in believing it will. All the suspicions and lies needs to be stopped one way or another.
Cheri is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 02:21 PM   #44 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Tousi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,125
Cheri, maybe I haven't read this closely enough but proving paternity already exists now so why waste tax dollars with this new proposed law?
Tousi is online now  
Old 03-09-2008, 02:46 PM   #45 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
Cheri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: All I wanted was a white knight with a good heart, soft touch, fast horse, ride me off into the sunset
Posts: 20,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tousi View Post
Cheri, maybe I haven't read this closely enough but proving paternity already exists now so why waste tax dollars with this new proposed law?
Yes, paternity test does exists but not everyone is testing unless there are suspicions, it's not demanding.

sometimes the mother will not admit that the child might not his until much later, there will be a feeling of betrayal. It's so unfair that fathers today are caring for a child which is unknowingly theirs.

This bill will make everyone be testing, no expectations If a woman has nothing to hide or has no other expectations then it should not affect the woman, it'll only affect those who had lied from the begin. So why would honest women have something to worry about? Just take it and get it over with.
Cheri is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 02:49 PM   #46 (permalink)
Railfan 4 life!
 
sequoias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The Evergreen State
Posts: 11,616
Sweetheart asked me to post this:

what to do if a woman gets pregnant and she knew that guy got her pregnant and he runs off?

Even you couldn't find him and how can you get birth certificate without proof of the dna results?
sequoias is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 03:05 PM   #47 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
Cheri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: All I wanted was a white knight with a good heart, soft touch, fast horse, ride me off into the sunset
Posts: 20,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by sequoias View Post
Sweetheart asked me to post this:

what to do if a woman gets pregnant and she knew that guy got her pregnant and he runs off?

Even you couldn't find him and how can you get birth certificate without proof of the dna results?
Good question, I think the birth certificate would leave a blank for the prove of fathering until the father is found, that including support for the child as well until the paternity test is completed. They will find him, they have a database to find the absent parents by social security numbers, employment, or place of residents.
Cheri is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 03:09 PM   #48 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheri View Post
It seems this bill pose a danger to you, worrying about honest people being testing, It's about having the "right" father presence in a child's life. The fact is there are numerous of mothers who had lied about the paternity of the child's father. It takes two people to create a life and nobody can change the fact that two people have created a child together. Both of them have rights and obligations as parents. It's about doing what's right in the eyes of the child. It's not about you, or I. That's why I did not even think about myself when I support this bill, I thought about all the children out there. I think this bill will protect the future emotional scars in the child's life, I have faith in believing it will. All the suspicions and lies needs to be stopped one way or another.
I understand what you are saying, Cheri, but that does not mean that ALL WOMEN should be held responsible for the ones that lie. And it is about you and I because it is a violation of our civil rights. And proving paternity is no guarantee that a father will be involved in a child's life. This bill does nothing to protect a child from emotional scars. All it does is record DNA, and it does so in a way that is insulting to women. Taking DNA, and assuming that a woman has lied about the paternity of her child creates suspicion, not decrease it. And a woman who lies is a woman who lies. She needs to dealt with on an individual basis. This is but one more governmental intrusion that is totally uneccesary and punishes the innocent. Quite frankly, I don't see this bill ever passing. We already have procedures in place for determining paternity when it is suspected that a woman has provided false information. Since there is already a way to correct her wrongs, there is no need to subject an entire population to DNA testing and added expense when paternity is not being contested.
jillio is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 03:12 PM   #49 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheri View Post
Yes, paternity test does exists but not everyone is testing unless there are suspicions, it's not demanding.

sometimes the mother will not admit that the child might not his until much later, there will be a feeling of betrayal. It's so unfair that fathers today are caring for a child which is unknowingly theirs.

This bill will make everyone be testing, no expectations If a woman has nothing to hide or has no other expectations then it should not affect the woman, it'll only affect those who had lied from the begin. So why would honest women have something to worry about? Just take it and get it over with.
If a woman lies about the paternity of her child, the feelings of betrayal will still be there. This does not get rid of that. Honest women have something to worry about because of the implied message of this proposed bill.
jillio is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 03:16 PM   #50 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheri View Post
Good question, I think the birth certificate would leave a blank for the prove of fathering until the father is found, that including support for the child as well until the paternity test is completed. They will find him, they have a database to find the absent parents by social security numbers, employment, or place of residents.
Exactly. There are already measures in place to handle these situations. We don't need to make mandatory paternity testing a law when paternity is not being contested. And, BTW, there are just as many men who deny their paternity to get out of taking responsibility as there are women who lie about paternity. In fact, it is usually the case when a case goes to court that the woman is stating who the father of the child is, and the father is denying it. And remember, the father's DNA sample has to be available to prove paternity.
jillio is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 05:08 PM   #51 (permalink)
Registered User
 
GarnetTigerMom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,590
Honesty I don't think we need to have that bill passed. It's the mother's right to do what she want on the birth certiciate. There no law required to force the mother to add the child s father name on the birth certificate. I agree with jilio that we have a right to protect our sexual relationship prviate and our medical records private as well. Whatever the reasons a single mother does, it's her business and no one else's business. Who are we to pass judgment on their personal life?
__________________


GarnetTigerMom

"The rain may be falling hard outside,
But your smile makes it all alright.
I'm so glad that you're my friend.
I know our friendship will never end."
-- Robert Alan
GarnetTigerMom is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 05:10 PM   #52 (permalink)
Registered User
 
GarnetTigerMom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,590
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by sequoias View Post
Sweetheart asked me to post this:

what to do if a woman gets pregnant and she knew that guy got her pregnant and he runs off?

Even you couldn't find him and how can you get birth certificate without proof of the dna results?
yeah some men don't want to take responbility as a father and runs away.. also some refuse to take DNA test, if the father refuse DNA test, she can take him to court to force him to take DNA test. Lot of dead beat fathers are lousy.
__________________


GarnetTigerMom

"The rain may be falling hard outside,
But your smile makes it all alright.
I'm so glad that you're my friend.
I know our friendship will never end."
-- Robert Alan
GarnetTigerMom is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 05:14 PM   #53 (permalink)
Registered User
 
GarnetTigerMom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheri View Post
It seems this bill pose a danger to you, worrying about honest people being testing, It's about having the "right" father presence in a child's life. The fact is there are numerous of mothers who had lied about the paternity of the child's father. It takes two people to create a life and nobody can change the fact that two people have created a child together. Both of them have rights and obligations as parents. It's about doing what's right in the eyes of the child. It's not about you, or I. That's why I did not even think about myself when I support this bill, I thought about all the children out there. I think this bill will protect the future emotional scars in the child's life, I have faith in believing it will. All the suspicions and lies needs to be stopped one way or another.
What if the mother lied to protect her child and herself? whatever the reasons the mothers have,, it her business. What if the father have a criminal history? What if he done something to her? maybe she have a good reasons to lie. Some women I have met says they did it for protection of their children. But, hey I respect their deiscions and their business.
__________________


GarnetTigerMom

"The rain may be falling hard outside,
But your smile makes it all alright.
I'm so glad that you're my friend.
I know our friendship will never end."
-- Robert Alan
GarnetTigerMom is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 05:15 PM   #54 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
Cheri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: All I wanted was a white knight with a good heart, soft touch, fast horse, ride me off into the sunset
Posts: 20,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarnetTigerMom View Post
It's the mother's right to do what she want on the birth certiciate.
Are you saying it's okay to lie on the birth certificate? Is it ok to pick any "father" that the mother thinks that might be the father of her child to be written on a birth certificate?
Cheri is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 05:19 PM   #55 (permalink)
Registered User
 
GarnetTigerMom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheri View Post
Are you saying it's okay to lie on the birth certificate? Is it ok to pick any "father" that the mother thinks that might be the father of her child to be written on a birth certificate?
No that is not what I am saying, I am saying the mother have a right to leave her child birth certificate blank. I never said making name to target other man listed as a false father. Did I say it's okay to write a false name on birth certificate? NOPE. tsk. She have rights to do what she want to do for a good reasons. I never said create a name to use other man name on birth certificate. Don't twist my words, please.
__________________


GarnetTigerMom

"The rain may be falling hard outside,
But your smile makes it all alright.
I'm so glad that you're my friend.
I know our friendship will never end."
-- Robert Alan
GarnetTigerMom is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 05:20 PM   #56 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
Cheri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: All I wanted was a white knight with a good heart, soft touch, fast horse, ride me off into the sunset
Posts: 20,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarnetTigerMom View Post
What if the mother lied to protect her child and herself? whatever the reasons the mothers have,, it her business. What if the father have a criminal history? What if he done something to her? maybe she have a good reasons to lie. Some women I have met says they did it for protection of their children. But, hey I respect their deiscions and their business.
DNA paternity test has nothing to do with visitations. It is to determine whether a particular father could be the biological father of the child. Nothing more nothing less.
Cheri is offline  
</