C.C.Sinned

Several killed in Egyptian blasts

__________________

Deafness

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com

C.C.Sinned

More Info

__________________

sequoias

more bombings?

__________________

C.C.Sinned

yes read about them

__________________

rjr2006

ugh... CT started to inspect the bags for security today.

GalaxyAngel

*sigh* not another one.... Geez..Why can't they quit it ?

__________________

Parent's proud our children.

C.C.Sinned

Associated Press/AP Online

SHARM EL-SHEIK, Egypt - Three car bombs exploded in quick succession in the Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheik early Saturday, ripping through a hotel and a coffeeshop packed with European and Egyptian tourists. The government said at least 62 people died in the deadliest attack in Egypt in nearly a decade.

The reception hall of the luxury Ghazala Gardens hotel collapsed into a pancaked pile of concrete, sending terrified guests fleeing for safety, according to an Associated Press reporter at the scene. Rescue workers hours later said they feared more victims may be buried in the rubble.

At least 62 people were killed, Health Minister Mohammed Awad Tag Eddin said. The interior minister earlier said 119 people were wounded and that at least eight foreigners were among the dead.

Interior Minister Habib al-Adli pinned the attack on Islamic militants. "This is an ugly act of terrorism," al-Adli said in a statement carried on the government news agency. "It has nothing to do with Islam, they are only acting under the slogan of Islam."

__________________

ravensteve1961

Well several reasons,,,Israel,, and Bush nor blair wouldnt use the nukes to shut em up.

diehardbiker

Well, Terrorist have their stupid religious belief that western must be destroyed.

Hey RS, nuke them won't solve problem. It will actually make it worse. We need not to use nuke at all!

ravensteve1961

We used the A BOMB on Japan and it worked.

Roadrunner

Ravensteve, time has changed, the world has changed since the bombing of Japan, thus, more countries today have an array of nukes to deploy, only chaos would reign down on planet Earth if the choice was ordered to 'nuke' these countries...this would not be a good idea to pursue, let alone setting a tempo for other countries to follow suit by sending off their own arensal of nukes. Sooo, forget about it--not in the best interest for the world we live on!

ravensteve1961

Roadrunner it wouldnt happen that way.If we used nukes on any arab nation all the world gonna do is make boycotts and stop trade deals with us. Russia,, china or any other country has nukes will not get involved what we do. All theyre gonna do is economic boycotts against us. I say So what? it would help jobs in the US and we wont by buying forgien products again.Like what the US is doing against cuba having an embargo against cuban cigars which hurts castros enconomy.

tegumi

OMG...... this is what I would expect to hear from you. Have you ever been there and seen the museums and monuments portraying the devastation??

Have you seen the building nicknamed "The A Bomb Dome"?? This building was almost directly under where the bomb went off, and to this day they have left it as it appeared after the blast.

I dont understand how you can be so ignorant and close-minded about something, saying basically "it worked".....

Attached Images

dome.jpg (28.7 KB, 3 views)

Reba

I think RS meant that dropping the bombs on Japan successfully quickly ended the war with Japan without further massive casualties to the allied troops. That was the goal of President Truman, so in that sense "it worked" (succeeded).

ravensteve1961

I belive this will end al queda and terrorism. Cause arabs will think twice before joining an terrorist organizion cause theyre be thinking about their families like their brothers and sisters to worry about. Cause they will turn down terrorist recruts cause they dont want their parents or their brothers and sisters dead.

Reba

Terrorism is a different kind of battle. It doesn't have a limited geographical location. Nuking a particular country or region won't eliminate the enemy. The enemy is already infiltrated throughout the world. They don't care about their families, so that threat won't work on them.

ravensteve1961

Wanna bet? Once Bin laden is killed its over. Just like the assassination of caesar bought down the roman empire.

backerman

Oh well... there will be more bombings in the near future, here or there. Iraq war doesn't solve the problems and it will lead more violence & revenge. Due to the Iraq war, we will be fighting terrorists for a very long time.

Yeah but President Bush is not interesting to catch Osama bin Laden because bin Laden's brother-in-law worked with Bush for the oil business in Texas.

Reba

What was his name and position? What years did he work with Bush? What does that have to do with catching Osama????

backerman

His name is Sheikh Khalid bin Mahfouz and he is Bush Financier. Mahfouz invested a lot of money into Bush's first oil company Arbusto Energy in 1980s. Bush not interest in catching Osama because of his business with the royal Saudi family. Bush doesn't want to admit that Saudi Arabia fund their money with terrorism and 80% of hijackers on 9/11 are from Saudi Arabia. Bush also trying to connect the Iraq or Saddam to 9/11. We know there is no link and we know there's no nuclear weapons in Iraq.

Reba

Thank you for the info.

Why does bin Mahfouz continue to deny that his sister is married to bin Laden?

Do you mean that he still gives money to Bush?


If Bush is not interested in catching Osama, why is he is still sending military teams to search for him?

diehardbiker

Yea, that is because NO other countries have this kind of bomb. Now plenty of countries have atomic bomb, just think about what reaction from these countries if we start to drop the bomb?

Too many copycats all over the world right now. Worth the risk? NAH!

diehardbiker

I personally DON'T believe terrorist was started because of Bush! The terrorist EXISTED before Bush became president. Whats more, there have been long term crisis in middle east long long long before Bush was even born! The real problem is that in the middle east is religious conflicts and their belief is that the western countries is axis of evil and shall be destroyed. They said so in their own bible!!! The problem esclated when Jewish was granted a land assisted by the United States long time ago known as Israel. This got other middle east countries pissed off about. They (middle east) wanted Israel to be wiped out. PERIOD! All because of bible teaching in extreme muslim community.
Bombing isn't new and it has happened plenty of times even before Bush's dad was president!

HiBluE01

Yes, I heard on news tv that was so terrible happening in Egypt was bombing somewhere and killing Egyptian people that happened of the terriosts.

__________________
HiBluE01

cabaca

FYI: Their "bible" is called Koran.

Reba

Very true.

backerman

No, was. It was in 1980s. Bush stopped doing business with him before he ran for President of the United States.

He sent a small group of military to search for him and it's not enough. Bush transfor a lot of soliders from Afgan to Iraq. They let him escape into other country. If Bush could've postpone his plan for Iraq War for few months then we could've probably capture Osama bin Laden and we don't have to worry about those terrorists' attacks or beheadings in Iraq.

Taylor

Getting rid of Osama will do nothing to end terrorism in this world. The only benefit is that it will give us a moral boost capturing the guy behind 9/11 and other attacks.

diehardbiker

That is very LIKELY true!