Idiotic decision on property rights coming to bite Justices in the ass?

ksbsnowowl · 06-28-2005, 11:17 PM

http://freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html

Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on Souter's land.

Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.

On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This is the present location of Mr. Souter's home.

Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.

The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the "Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas Shrugged."

Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.

"This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel development."

Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Institute For Justice and participants in the Free State Project among others.

javapride · 06-28-2005, 11:32 PM

what goes ard comes ard!

DeafSCUBA98 · 06-29-2005, 01:48 AM

now that supreme court guy... deserve what he gets!

Taylor · 06-29-2005, 02:38 AM

LOL...I love it although I'm sure they will find some reason not to take his land. In reality, it will be because he is a judge but the paperwork will say it doesn't perk right or there is a creek that is considered a wetland, etc.

ITPjohn · 06-29-2005, 06:56 AM

Mods,

Could you merge this thread with one I started earlier. They both discuss Supreme Court ruling. Thnx. John

http://alldeaf.com/showthread.php?p=344704#post344704

06-28-2005, 11:17 PM	#1 (permalink)
ksbsnowowl Registered User Join Date: May 2005 Location: Kansas City MO, or Mequon WI Posts: 69	Idiotic decision on property rights coming to bite Justices in the ass? http://freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on Souter's land. Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic benefits when the land is developed by the new owner. On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This is the present location of Mr. Souter's home. Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land. The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the "Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas Shrugged." Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans. "This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel development." Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Institute For Justice and participants in the Free State Project among others. __________________ I'm hearing. My wife is deaf.

06-29-2005, 01:48 AM	#3 (permalink)
DeafSCUBA98 my cute fish of the year! Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: land of 10,000 lakes and living by one of them Posts: 4,627	now that supreme court guy... deserve what he gets! __________________ Nucleus Freedom 04/18/05 activiated 05/16/05

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Today
Deafness	Sponsored Links __________________ This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com

06-28-2005, 11:32 PM	#2 (permalink)
javapride Java's Big Island Life! Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: hawaii Posts: 6,509	what goes ard comes ard!

06-29-2005, 02:38 AM	#4 (permalink)
Taylor Banned Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 1,586	LOL...I love it although I'm sure they will find some reason not to take his land. In reality, it will be because he is a judge but the paperwork will say it doesn't perk right or there is a creek that is considered a wetland, etc.

06-29-2005, 06:56 AM	#5 (permalink)
ITPjohn SAC Class of 05 Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Starship Enterprise... WISH! Posts: 771	Mods, Could you merge this thread with one I started earlier. They both discuss Supreme Court ruling. Thnx. John http://alldeaf.com/showthread.php?p=344704#post344704