AllDeaf.com
Our Sponsors

Go Back   AllDeaf.com > Deaf Community > Current Events

  

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-03-2005, 03:46 PM   #31 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
Cheri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: All I wanted was a white knight with a good heart, soft touch, fast horse, ride me off into the sunset
Posts: 20,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazymanw00t
We can't just point out to our president, congress, and FBI/CIA for war. We decided the war. Congress, and President had to depend on our feelings. Today's war was 50/50 so President and Congress went ahead with war. If everyone in USA disagree to go war with Iraqi then President and Congress will not declare war aganist Iraqi.

That is some bullshit line I ever heard, If everyone in the USA disagree to go with the war then President Bush wouldn't have said go ahead? Bush never asked us what we want. I did not vote for Bush for two years, And what make you think we all wanted the war? Bush is the one who annouced it and say "We are going to have a war" Did not even ask us to vote on it. Don't be silly.
__________________
Cheri is offline   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Deafness

Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com
   
Old 02-03-2005, 03:50 PM   #32 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
Cheri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: All I wanted was a white knight with a good heart, soft touch, fast horse, ride me off into the sunset
Posts: 20,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Codger
Presidents do not declare a war. Congress does.
I did not say that President declare the war pay attention to my words I said Bush did start up with saying he wanted the war. Of course nothing is a go ahead without Congress approve just like changing the Constitution.
__________________
Cheri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 04:04 PM   #33 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
Angel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,695
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazymanw00t
We can't just point out to our president, congress, and FBI/CIA for war. We decided the war. Congress, and President had to depend on our feelings. Today's war was 50/50 so President and Congress went ahead with war. If everyone in USA disagree to go war with Iraqi then President and Congress will not declare war aganist Iraqi.
I find this hard to believe is because alot of American people do not want to see a war happening and they sure don't agree on having a war either, so it was more of what Bush wanted and push the Congress in agreeing to this too, so its the government who made that choice by seeking a war not the American people....

If I had to vote then my answer will be NO because I rather to have peace than war!
Angel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 04:31 PM   #34 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5
I think its really a question of balance and too many people on the planet for it to support. When 20% of the population consumes 80% of the planets resources it becomes a major problem. In the past a war would bring it somewhat back into balance, but now I think it has gotten out of control and we can't afford to have WWIII.
Tracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 04:39 PM   #35 (permalink)
Jesus Christ is my LORD!
 
Crazymanw00t's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 818
Yeah, I am saying that Congress can't do anything without our feelings or decision. If congress do other than with our decision then that congress won't be congress for next term. Other possilbe that the business or forgien brides congress for some votes. I am not going to be surprised with the brides situation.
Crazymanw00t is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 06:15 PM   #36 (permalink)
Smashin' Pumpkins!
 
tekkmortal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,537
Send a message via ICQ to tekkmortal
I suppose Bush failed to see that rebuilding Iraq is more expensive than rebuilding America. I think all 50 states will love to have $1 billion dollars from the federal government. Instead we have to spend $50 billion or more a day in Iraq. If we have to keep the troops until 2007 that means the total will be $35,000 billion dollars!
tekkmortal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 06:17 PM   #37 (permalink)
Gimme some Poring Love!
 
PyrollisAhFiros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Back in Chicago!!!! Good to be home again!
Posts: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by Codger
Hydrogen fuel cell technology will be widespread in the next 20 years. Bye bye gas engines. Water vapor exhaust fumes. Dinosaurs had zero technology. Bye bye dinosaurs. Solar technology will be very feasable in 10 years. Bye bye coal fired and hot nuke power plants. Computers will be so powerful that environmental monotoring and modeling will enable us to prepare for environmental disaster ahead of time. Bye bye tsunami disaster, no more Pompei's either. Weather control through programs like HAARP are already a reality. Laser technology will advance so far that the stuff you see on Star Trek will be old hat. Medical advances will astound you. You remember Gordy's visor? Lets the blind guy "see"? Nearly done now. There will be so many changes in YOUR lifetime that the human brain will be hard pressed to keep up. Born with a short leg? We can lengthen it now. Get your arm or wanker cut off? We can reattach it now, nerves included. Humans have always had the drive to survive in whatever environment they find themselves.

Simple enough?
All in all, you are saying that what we know now will be old news when 50 years come around, we will know the stuff we don't know right now? Like 50 years ago, we don't know the stuff we know today. If we use it properly, by the year 2050, a catastrophe will not happen. Not only that but we will be converting what we use now, into something that do not contribute to global warming, pollution or the deteriotating of the environment? i.e. your example of converting gas engines into hydrogen fuel cells, which will mean 20 years later, we won't even touch oil anymore? We will have no use for oil anymore now that we are able to use water to power up our cars. There might be a cure for AIDs soon and like you said, stem cell research is making a breakthrough because my friend's mother had to get one of her teeth removed, then the dentist placed a tiny material inside her gum and one week later, she grew another tooth. Technology has changed, but not rapidly because it takes a while to adapt to the newfound materials/inventions. There are researches, test groups, release it to a control group and see if the audience like it, the pros and cons and then try to make it more mainstreamed by distributing it to the public and then work on it some more to see if it can be reduced in cost by changing some kind of material and on, just like what Japan is doing now with their technological devices. The cycle goes on and on and when the cycle continues, it get better by the end of the cycle and a new cycle begins, a new hypothesis is developed with the knowledge applied to it, and goes through the development stages till the end of the cycle. If we know more than we do now, it won't hurt us and it will indeed help us prevent and defend ourselves from anything that could cause harm.

Did I get that right? If not, please correct anything I made an error on.
PyrollisAhFiros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 09:02 PM   #38 (permalink)
This body is on loan
 
Codger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 817
Close PAF, but you are still thinking in a straight line. If you do not keep yourself up on the leading edge of technology DAILY, you will be lost in TEN years, not fifty. In my lifetime we have gone from a sliderule to portable computers. You will see comperable advances in the next ten years. Lead time from concept to production of materials and products is also compressed. I worked on the moulds and assembly process for the Avalanche truck grille a mere eight months before we were in full production. In that eight months, five running changes were made in the overall design, eight in the components, twelve in the paint processes, and more in the final assembly process.
Codger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:18 PM.


Join AllDeaf on Facebook!

All text, images, and other content are Copyright © 2002-2008 by AllDeaf.com. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.