Democrats think bush should spend on the troops not on his inaugural

ravensteve1961 · 01-15-2005, 12:44 AM

Well it seems to me bill clinton didnt spend his money to help the poor,Help the children, Help the women that he claims we should be helping. Bill clinton spent 30 million on his inaugural re-election back in 1996. But parton a guy named marc rich so he can get out of IRS debt that he owes millions of dollars to the IRS that could have helped the poor,Helped the children, Helped the women that he claims that are importaint. He didnt help them so why should bush help the troops instead on his inaugural re-election? Its his money he should spend it on what he wants.
Link here

Vance · 01-15-2005, 12:56 AM

Your post in other topic:

Quote:

Originally Posted by ravensteve1961

I think that money should go towards the war.

Source: http://www.alldeaf.com/showpost.php?...13&postcount=7

Dude, once again you are contradicting yourself.

ravensteve1961 · 01-15-2005, 01:36 AM

Well thats a differant topic. Bush is re-elected so he should have a party for winning his re-election. Spending 40 million towards the military is like the world series champion home team should spend towards cleaning up the stadium instead of buying champaige bottles so players can have a victory party.

***VamPyroX*** · 01-15-2005, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ravensteve1961

Well thats a differant topic. Bush is re-elected so he should have a party for winning his re-election. Spending 40 million towards the military is like the world series champion home team should spend towards cleaning up the stadium instead of buying champaige bottles so players can have a victory party.

You're still contradicting yourself.

01-15-2005, 12:44 AM	#1 (permalink)
ravensteve1961 Banned Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Here Posts: 3,940	Democrats think bush should spend on the troops not on his inaugural Well it seems to me bill clinton didnt spend his money to help the poor,Help the children, Help the women that he claims we should be helping. Bill clinton spent 30 million on his inaugural re-election back in 1996. But parton a guy named marc rich so he can get out of IRS debt that he owes millions of dollars to the IRS that could have helped the poor,Helped the children, Helped the women that he claims that are importaint. He didnt help them so why should bush help the troops instead on his inaugural re-election? Its his money he should spend it on what he wants. Link here

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Today
Deafness	Sponsored Links __________________ This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on AllDeaf.com

01-15-2005, 01:36 AM	#3 (permalink)
ravensteve1961 Banned Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Here Posts: 3,940	Well thats a differant topic. Bush is re-elected so he should have a party for winning his re-election. Spending 40 million towards the military is like the world series champion home team should spend towards cleaning up the stadium instead of buying champaige bottles so players can have a victory party.