Police beat deaf man for not hearing orders!

MangaReader

Active Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2007
Messages
1,823
Reaction score
10
Two Oklahoma Highway Patrol troopers have been pulled off the streets following allegations of excessive force against a deaf man in Oklahoma City.

According to a website set up for Pearl Pearson, the 64-year-old man is recovering from his injuries nearly two weeks after a violent confrontation with two Highway Patrol officers during a traffic stop.

n-PEARL-PEARSON-large.jpg


"Pearl pulled over and rolled down his window, expecting an officer to ask for [his] identification," the website states. "An officer struck him in the face before Pearl had the chance to do anything. As you can see, he was struck multiple times."

The website alleges Pearson, who is deaf and diabetic, has a placard on his driver's side door that says, "Driver is deaf." His license also allegedly indicates he is deaf.

"An interpreter was never provided while Pearl was under the care of law enforcement," the website states. "Not during the booking, hospital, or time at the jail was an interpreter provided, even though Pearl requested one."

Oklahoma Highway Patrol spokesman George Brown told HuffPost that troopers Eric Foster and Kelton Hayes have been placed on suspension with pay.

"An internal investigation is being conducted," Brown said. "If it is determined there were any violations of department policy, the appropriate action will be taken."

The troopers stopped Pearson because he allegedly fled the scene of a car accident in south Oklahoma City. When they stopped him, he "resisted Trooper Foster and Trooper Hayes ... [and] refused to comply with repeated lawful orders to display his hands," according to a police affidavit.

"A physical altercation ensued for approximately seven minutes," the affidavit states.

The document does not indicate whether the troopers were aware Pearson is hearing impaired.

Pearson was taken into custody at the scene and ultimately charged for resisting arrest and leaving the scene of an accident.

Pearson's attorney, Billy Coyle, did not return a call for comment from The Huffington Post on Tuesday. In an earlier interview with KFOR News, Coyle denied his client did anything wrong.

"My client is completely innocent of these allegations," Coyle said. "We are waiting on the OHP report and we are sorting through the facts of the case. My client is profoundly deaf and was trying to give officers his specialty license during the stop."

According to Brown, neither Pearson nor Coyle have filed a complaint about the incident with the Highway Patrol.

The organization "Total Source for Hearing-loss and Access" is holding a fundraiser for Pearson in Tulsa, Okla., Thursday. The benefit will try to raise funds for his legal and medical expenses.

Rene Ryan, the executive director for the organization, told HuffPost the agency does not have a position on whether excessive force was used in the case.

"We have not asked for the details of what happened," Ryan said. "We are an advocacy agency and for us, there was a communication issue and a culture issue that was not addressed, and as a result, he sustained injuries ... We're trying to focus on [educating people] so this does not happen again."



See link for photos of aftermath.

Police Allegedly Beat Pearl Pearson For Disobeying Orders He Could Not Hear
 
Pearl Pearson

Pearl was left wondering “why” the the entire time. He has no clue why he was beat. Pearl and his family are still not sure, but are ready for some answers.
From the OP's link:

The troopers stopped Pearson because he allegedly fled the scene of a car accident in south Oklahoma City. When they stopped him, he "resisted Trooper Foster and Trooper Hayes ... [and] refused to comply with repeated lawful orders to display his hands," according to a police affidavit.
Pearl didn't say anything about leaving the scene of an accident and resisting the police. His son is a police officer.

:confused:
 
This definitely needs thorough investigation. Even if he was pulled over for hit-and-run, why was he struck in the face?
 
This definitely needs thorough investigation. Even if he was pulled over for hit-and-run, why was he struck in the face?
See the title, "Police beat deaf man for not hearing orders!". You know how bad cops are. Poor anger management.
 
See the title, "Police beat deaf man for not hearing orders!". You know how bad cops are. Poor anger management.
I know but it didn't say what orders he didn't obey. Even then, there's no reason to strike him in the face.
 
Why not he told police says "I'm deaf" and says "back off!" But he arrest for no excuse! And police abuse that elders I'm sure police chief would have to says!?!

I'm sure police need treat and respect deaf!! And no abuse to elders,people,kids

Police do respect me because I'm deaf and police never abuse me
 
I know but it didn't say what orders he didn't obey. Even then, there's no reason to strike him in the face.

The troopers stopped Pearson because he allegedly fled the scene of a car accident in south Oklahoma City. When they stopped him, he "resisted Trooper Foster and Trooper Hayes ... [and] refused to comply with repeated lawful orders to display his hands," according to a police affidavit.
That was the order but he's deaf. Good cops don't hit people's face like that. Bad cops do. They are currently suspended with pay. Unbelievable. I read the comments saying that if they are charged with excessive force or something like that, they must pay money back. I hope so.
 
Why not he told police says "I'm deaf" and says "back off!" But he arrest for no excuse! And police abuse that elders I'm sure police chief would have to says!?!

I'm sure police need treat and respect deaf!! And no abuse to elders,people,kids

Police do respect me because I'm deaf and police never abuse me

It doesn't work if you have felony stop.
 
That was the order but he's deaf. Good cops don't hit people's face like that. Bad cops do. They are currently suspended with pay. Unbelievable. I read the comments saying that if they are charged with excessive force or something like that, they must pay money back. I hope so.
Thank you. Somehow I missed that sentence.
 
Mod note:

Two threads has been merged. :thumb:
 
Back
Top